- $500 Gaming PC: Day 1, Component Selection
- Secure Remote Data Access for Home Users
- System Builder Marathon: Price/Performance
- System Builder Marathon: Overclocking
- System Builder Marathon: High-Cost System
- System Builder Marathon: Mid-Cost System
- System Builder Marathon: Low-Cost System
- The World's Best Hardware Prices
- DIY Solar-Powered PC: Solar Components
- SBM 5: Price/Performance
- Multi-core CPUs: An Idea
- Core2Dou E6400 Temp.. Is it ok?
- Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core freeze in Vista x64
- Can a overheated powersupply cause loss of power?
- Phenom X4 9850 BE is out at newegg.com
- Burnt CPU and motherboard Socket
- CPU overclock causing glitchy graphics
- Non-overclocked computer overheated problem!
- x2 3800 oc speed
- Strange system lockups during Heavy Graphics Stress
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: cpu, graphic, game
Topics: Build Your Own, Overclocking
Syndication:
Overclocking Details
The Antec NSK4480B easily swallowed all of our components with room to spare, the extra space allowing air to move freely within. Cooling is an extremely important factor towards achieving a good overclock, and a 120mm exhaust fan behind the processor pulls air past the Cooler Master Hyper TX2 CPU cooler.

The Pentium Dual-Core E2160 starts out at a pathetic 1.80 GHz, using a 9x multiplier and 200 MHz FSB clock.

Detected memory timings were almost as bad as the CPU speed, with latencies of 5.0-5-5-18 at a slow 2T command rate.

The E2160 didn’t go far at stock voltage, so we tried 1.45 volts for the CPU core, FSB, and Northbridge (MCH). That got us over 3.0 GHz, without overheating, using the processor’s stock 9x multiplier.
Increasing the CPU core voltage to 1.55 volts allowed stable operation at 3.20 GHz, but limited memory ratios and an inability to overclock the modules beyond DDR2-850 forced us to use a low data rate of DDR2-712.
The solution was to drop our CPU multiplier to 8x. This gave us a 3.20 GHz CPU clock speed at FSB-1600 (400MHz FSB Clock) and allowed the memory to run at its rated DDR2-800 speed. An added benefit of dropping the CPU multiplier and increasing its FSB comes in the form of higher FSB bandwidth.

Dual-Channel mode gives DDR2-800 the same theoretical bandwidth as FSB-1600, but we’ve often found slight performance increases from using higher memory speeds. But without the ability to overclock our RAM, we instead looked for a performance increase through lower latency settings. Our low-cost Wintec modules worked perfectly at CAS 5-4-4-10 and 2.1V, but we were still stuck at a 2T command rate.

Test technician Shelton Romhanyi was unable to try overclocking the 8800GS graphics card due to time constraints, but we will consider re-using the card in future budget-overclocking articles.
- Previous page Will It Game?
- Next page Test Configuration
- 1 / 4
- Next
-
Quad vs Dual core in a budget machine is really shown here. The quad core just simply isnt worth the money right now. Not enough apps really take advantage of it.
Overall its a smoking little machine. The processor with nothing but a heatsink change will hit 3 ghz + as shown in this article. She games, but is on a 19" LCD, which has a native resolution of 1200X something I think so the 9600 GT is plenty of video card for her.
Overall this is a great article and $500 can easily be adapted to whatever you need give or take $50 depending on what components you salvage off the old PC.
I think the dual vs. quad debate is more relevant when multitasking is involved. Certainly in a budget build a dual is the right choice.
I hope to see a Spider platform in the same bugdet or on lower one, and thus, compare.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6811129024
| joetheone wrote : Great Article. But has anyone else noticed that the Antec NSK4480B is no longer available at newegg? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6811129032 I was looking to pick one up but not the cheapest i can find them is around $100. |
Antec is likely going through a product refresh.
Example - The Antec 900 is being replaced by the Antec 1200.
Expect to see a similar Product out soon in the same price range.
| Mach5Motorsport wrote : Any reviews of a Phenom 8400 system? They're selling for about $500. How would that fare? |
Likely not very well.
Very few retails systems have anything above very basic graphic cards.
Even the High-End Quad Core sytems lack decent graphics.
Add to that, the E8400 has one less core and is clocked slower than the previous $1000 build.
- 1 / 4
- Next
-



I know time is limited but is it really right to compare the stock 8800gs to an oc 3870.
Anyway I think the results show that at 500 bucks you can build a nice gaming pc and thats number has come down quite a bit.