Page 1:Will It Game?
Page 2:Overclocking Details
Page 3:Test Configuration
Page 4:Benchmark Results: Crysis, Prey
Page 5:Supreme Commander, UT3, Warhammer
Page 6:Audio: iTunes, Lame MP3
Page 7:Applications: 3DS Max, Cinema4D, Photoshop, AVG, WinRAR
Page 8:Synthetics: 3D Mark 2006
Page 9:PC Mark 2005
Page 10:Sandra XII
Page 11:Average Performance Differences
Page 12:Performance Per Dollar, Conclusion
PC Mark 2005
PC Mark 2005’s system score shows the $500 gamer far behind the System Builder Marathon configuration, but we’ll have to look at individual tests to see why.
The $500 Gaming PC’s Pentium Dual-Core takes a phenomenal lead over the System Builder Marathon’s Phenom in PC Mark’s CPU test, at least when it’s overclocked.
PC Mark’s RAM tests hand a huge win to the overclocked $500 Gaming PC, likely because we increased its FSB from 200MHz clock to 400MHz clock.
The System Builder Marathon’s drive slightly outperformed that of the $500 Gaming PC. Since this is the last individual test from our PC Mark 2005 suite, we can only assume that the oddball “System Test” results were due to the SBM configuration’s more powerful graphics card.
- Will It Game?
- Overclocking Details
- Test Configuration
- Benchmark Results: Crysis, Prey
- Supreme Commander, UT3, Warhammer
- Audio: iTunes, Lame MP3
- Applications: 3DS Max, Cinema4D, Photoshop, AVG, WinRAR
- Synthetics: 3D Mark 2006
- PC Mark 2005
- Sandra XII
- Average Performance Differences
- Performance Per Dollar, Conclusion