- Extreme FSB: Taking the E6750 Beyond 4 GHz
- What's Faster Our Builds or Dell's H2C?
- Overclocking Marathon Day 3 - A Budget Build
- Overclocking Marathon Day 2 - A Home Brew
- Tom's Hardware's 2007 CPU Charts
- Energy Efficiency: AMD vs. Intel
- AMD's Smart Strike: Athlon X2 BE-2350
- Which is the Best Mainstream CPU?
- Remote PC Management with Intel's vPro
- Semiconductor Production 101
- CPU comparison question.
- E8400 vs Q6600
- E8500 and AS5 'burn in' result
- Need advice on what to do next
- Intel's 'Overspeed protection' will limit Core i7 overclocks!!!!!!
- E8400 FAIL AFTER OVERCLOCKING
- prime95 torture test ?? give me bluescreen !! WTF help plz
- Best Processor for Gaming ??
- High-end and Luxury P45-GIGABYTE P45T EXTREME Air-Cooling 659MHz
- Is this mobo ok for overclocking a 8500? confused about FSB :(
Synthetic
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: extreme, fsb, 2
Syndication:
Synthetic

PC Mark's System Test gives little advantage to the four-core Core 2 Extreme QX6850, but it's still an advantage that goes against the Core 2 Duo E6750's higher clock speed.

Though the Core 2 Extreme QX6850 trounces the Core 2 Duo E6750 in PC Mark 2005's CPU test, we were actually expecting the difference to be significantly larger.

PC Mark 2005's memory benchmark appears to show that four-core processors are able to use Intel's high-speed FSB more effectively, at least when CPU speed is pushed to the limit. The Core 2 Duo E6750's memory speed was higher, yet it received a lower score in this test.



Sandra 2005's CPU math test shows the gains we were expecting in PC Mark's CPU test, with an approximate 100% performance improvement for the Core 2 Extreme QX6850's additional cores.
- Previous page Audio Encoding
- Next page Synthetic, Continued