Apple M5 chip smashes Snapdragon X2 Elite in early single-thread benchmarks — single core scores rival Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K and beat AMD's 9950X3D, teasing multi-core potential of future variants

Apple M5 SoC
(Image credit: Apple)

Apple unveiled the latest addition to its family of homegrown chips — the M5 — a couple of days ago, and it's powering both the new iPad Pro and the 14-inch MacBook Pro. New Geekbench listings spotted by Tech Info reveal that the performance in single-core scores is enough to rival Intel's Ultra 9 285K and breeze past AMD's 9950X3D. As is to be expected, it struggles in multi-core against those models, but the results show the potential of Apple's latest silicon and the surely-inevitable Pro and Max variants of this new chip.

The M5 iPad Pro scores 4,138 points in the single-core test, outperformed by the M5 MacBook Pro, which scores 4,263 points. That's not too bad, but the real jump is observed in multi-core results, where the M5 MacBook Pro scores 17,862 points versus the iPad's 16,366 — constituting a 9% difference in performance. That's with the same 10-core base configuration on either device, but the MacBook does have active cooling and a much thicker chassis that can prevent thermal throttling and allow the chip to boost higher, sustaining that for longer periods of time.

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch (M5, 2025)

The M5-powered MacBook Pro (Image credit: Apple)

More importantly, though, these numbers are enough to beat the recently-launched Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme, which scored around 4,080 points in the single-core Geekbench test, meaning the M5 in even the iPad is faster — and that's using official Qualcomm numbers. Moreover, compared to the M4, the new M5 is almost 10% ahead in single-core performance, and around 15% faster in multi-core performance versus the newest M4 MacBook Pro listing on Geekbench.

Compared to PC chips, the M5 is only behind a few single-core listings on Geekbench, if we count the best results, which makes sense considering how there's literally only one M5 MacBook Pro score right now, so it's quite cherry-picked. This also serves as your disclaimer for taking all these numbers with a grain of salt, since the sample size is simply too low at the moment to jump to any conclusions.

Intel's Core i9-14900KS scores 4,457 points in the single-core test, making it 4.6% faster. The current-gen Core Ultra 9 285K isn't far off at 4,306 points, rendering the M5 only about 1% slower. AMD's fastest chip on Geekbench is actually the midrange Ryzen 5 7600 with 4,226 points, but that test is deemed invalid; therefore, both the 9950X and the 9800X3D take the top spot, with 3,616 (and 3,615) points — which the M5 comfortably bests.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
M5 versus PC chips (Geekbench average)

CPU Name

Single-Core Score

Multi-Core Score

% Difference vs. M5 (single)

% Difference vs. M5 (multi)

Apple M5

4,263

17,862

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

3,399

22,093

-20.26%

+23.68%

AMD Ryzen 9950X

3,385

21,431

-20.59%

+19.98%

Intel Core i9-14900KS

3,239

23,187

-24.02%

+29.81%

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

3,217

22,739

-24.55%

+27.31%

In multi-threaded performance, though, the M5 gets absolutely shredded across the board, and that's because it simply doesn't have enough cores to stack up to the AMD and Intel flagships. However, this could change with the higher spec'd 14-core M5 that hasn't been tested yet, and we'd assume the M5 Pro and M5 Max will certainly help level the playing field in this regard. The table above uses numbers from Geekbench's processor benchmark database to paint a more accurate picture, alongside the extreme differences we mentioned earlier.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

  • Gururu
    The table actually shows AMD beating Intel in Single-core scores but Intel beating AMD in Multi-Core scores.
    Reply
  • alceryes
    Does Tom's proofread anymore?! Is this just an AI-generated article?!

    From the article - "The M5 iPad Pro scores 4,138 points in the single-core test, outperforming the M5 MacBook Pro, which scores 4,263 points."

    Last I checked, and I may be a little rusty at basic math, 4,138 is less than 4,263. Maybe I'm wrong...?
    Reply
  • wicked-warlock
    alceryes said:
    Does Tom's proofread anymore?! Is this just an AI-generated article?!

    From the article - "The M5 iPad Pro scores 4,138 points in the single-core test, outperforming the M5 MacBook Pro, which scores 4,263 points."

    Last I checked, and I may be a little rusty at basic math, 4,138 is less than 4,263. Maybe I'm wrong...?
    I think it was a misprint. I think he meant the M4 Pro. See the last paragraph, " However, this could change with the higher spec'd 14-core M5 that hasn't been tested yet, and we'd assume the M5 Pro and M5 Max will certainly help level the playing field in this regard. ". Yes, proof reading could catch those mistakes.
    Reply
  • andrep74
    alceryes said:
    Does Tom's proofread anymore?! Is this just an AI-generated article?!

    I presume proof-reading is reserved for paid articles.
    Reply
  • Heat_Fan89
    Awesome news! Let me know when it can play Battlefield 6 in 4K @ 60FPS.
    Reply
  • Thunder64
    Gururu said:
    The table actually shows AMD beating Intel in Single-core scores but Intel beating AMD in Multi-Core scores.

    Yup, it "rivals" the 285k while it "breezes" past the 9950X3D, which happens to score higher in ST than the 285k. The bias is showing.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    And here's the thing: An M5 MacBook Air is CHEAPER than a snapdragon Elite laptop.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Time to move to apple :)
    Reply
  • JasonovichClone
    Amdlova said:
    Time to move to apple :)
    These are just Geek synthetic benchmark, doesn't actually mean anything in actual applications.
    Geek benchmark were formally the mouth piece for Intel but grass is greener in the Apple garden. So the bias has shifted to the fruity one and cherry picking is their forte.
    Let's see M5 pushing 120 FPS on Cyberpunk in 2K 😎
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    JasonovichClone said:
    Let's see M5 pushing 120 FPS on Cyberpunk in 2K 😎

    Let me see a $799 Windows laptop pushing 120GFPS in Cyberpunk at 2K, actual 2K not DLSS/FSR fractional resolution rendering, without severe detail cutting, especially one based on Qualcomm Snapdragon CPUs.
    Reply