Alphacool’s VPP755 Pump Sounds Too Good To Be True, Better Than D5 In Every Metric

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Kevin Carbotte is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware who primarily covers VR and AR hardware. He has been writing for us for more than four years.

  • urbanj
    Looking forward to a review/comparison with the D5, as I was a few weeks away from ordering parts for a water cooling loop once my new case arrived.
    Reply
  • fast_fate
    Review: http://www.xtremerigs.net/2016/10/31/alphacool-eispumpe-vpp755-pump-review/
    Reply
  • ihateregister
    Shame. It's voltage controlled, not a PWM controlled pump. And they skimped on the electronics.
    Reply
  • alextheblue
    18835184 said:
    Shame. It's voltage controlled, not a PWM controlled pump. And they skimped on the electronics.

    It accepts a PWM signal and when such a signal is provided, uses that to determine at what speed it should be running. How is that not "PWM controlled"? Plus they provided an easy way to cap peak RPM without additional software.

    Edit: Watch the embedded video for details.
    Reply
  • urbanj
    18833617 said:
    Review: http://www.xtremerigs.net/2016/10/31/alphacool-eispumpe-vpp755-pump-review/

    nice thanks :)
    Reply
  • jasonkaler
    Wow, it makes me wonder how bad the original design was that it could be improved on by a whole 50% efficiency.

    That means that originally, at least half the power was consumed by forces other than actually pumping water.
    Reply
  • shrapnel_indie
    18836035 said:
    Wow, it makes me wonder how bad the original design was that it could be improved on by a whole 50% efficiency.

    That means that originally, at least half the power was consumed by forces other than actually pumping water.

    Lets stop and think a sec. (hard for a Monday morning, or a Sunday morning for that matter.)

    50% improvement.... say (unit just randomly chosen) it pumped 100 mL per second. The 50% improvement would be 150 mL/S. From the improved position, the old unit is 1/3 less efficient. I do understand your point though and wonder where the losses were.

    Reply
  • JakeWearingKhakis
    Good stuff. Keep improving!
    Reply
  • KD_Gaming
    Im surprised none of you have noticed the flow rate... 350l/h. A D5 with a ek top puts out 1500l/h with a 3.9m pressure head. Overall ill take the D5 anyday over this.
    Reply
  • urbanj
    18837841 said:
    Im surprised none of you have noticed the flow rate... 350l/h. A D5 with a ek top puts out 1500l/h with a 3.9m pressure head. Overall ill take the D5 anyday over this.

    ...maybe we haven't noticed it, because we have been looking at charts that show the D5 below the VPP755.
    If you want to link what you're looking at maybe?
    Reply