Asus ROG Strix RX 5600 XT O6G Gaming Review: Solid but Expensive

Do unique fan and RGB features make this card worth its high price?

Asus ROG Strix RX 5600 XT O6G Gaming
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Expanding the scope to include the RTX 2060, the Asus RX ROG Strix 5600 XT is almost 3% slower versus the Sapphire card that ran a few percent faster than the Nvidia card. Again, this is mostly due to the Asus card running slower memory. Seeing these performance numbers, the this Strix card could do with a price drop.

Across 10 of 11 games, the Asus ROG Strix RX 5600 XT O6G averaged 60 fps or higher at 1080p. The only title the card did not stay above that level is in Metro: Exodus, where it averaged 54 fps. Five titles (Strange Brigade, Far Cry 5, Final Fantasy XIV, Forza Horizon 4, and Battlefield V) all ran over 100 fps. Metro aside, the rest are in the 70s and 80s. As you can see, the Asus card is quite capable at 1080p when using the in-game canned ultra settings.

Joe Shields
Staff Writer, Components

Joe Shields is a staff writer at Tom’s Hardware. He reviews motherboards and PC components.

  • mossberg
    Moral of the story, don't pay for the Asus tax. They think their name adds value, which it does not. Sapphire is the best, followed by power color, when it comes to AMD cards. I see 0 reason to spend that kind of money, on a 5600xt, when you can get a faster card, for a similar cost, or less. $339 is RX 5700 territory.
    Reply
  • ron baker
    Im sure the Die sizes aren't different on the two 5600xt models ... otherwise thats a scoop!
    Reply