Nvidia Titan Xp 12GB Review

Titan Xp recently replaced the Titan X atop Nvidia’s desktop graphics card hierarchy, correcting the strangeness of a $700 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti outperforming the company’s $1200 flagship. You’d think that would be another milestone to celebrate. But Nvidia announced the news quietly, curtly declining our request to take Titan Xp for a spin. The writing was on the wall, then: Titan Xp, still priced at $1200, assuredly wouldn’t serve up enough performance to tempt gamers away from the 1080 Ti. It was built to correct a discontinuity in Nvidia’s line-up.

And yet, we cannot help but wonder how much additional performance you get from a fully-enabled GP102 processor operating at a similar GPU Boost clock as 1080 Ti, coupled with 11 Gb/s GDDR5X memory overclocked even higher. So, like moths to a flame, we went out and bought ourselves a Titan Xp.

Specifications

Titan Xp, From The Inside

Up until now, Quadro P6000 was the only card based on a pristine GP102 processor. The previous-gen Titan X, also constructed around GP102, had two of its Streaming Multiprocessors disabled (for more on GP102, check out our Nvidia Titan X Pascal 12GB Review).

But as yields at TSMC improve, Nvidia has more fully-functional GPUs to go around. Titan Xp is a direct beneficiary of this. All 30 of the processor’s SMs are enabled, yielding 3840 CUDA cores and 240 texture units. Using the base clock rate to calculate compute performance, this gives Titan Xp an FP32 rate of roughly 10.8 TFLOPS (or 12.1 TFLOPS if you believe it can maintain its rated GPU Boost frequency though compute-intensive workloads). Unfortunately, with only four FP64 cores per SM, Titan Xp’s double-precision rate plummets to 337.2 MFLOPS at its base clock rate.

Like the Titan X before it, Titan Xp sports GP102’s complete back-end. All 12 of its 32-bit memory controllers are active, each bound to eight ROPs and 256KB of L2 cache. That adds up to 96 ROPs, 3MB of shared L2, and 12GB of GDDR5X.


Titan Xp
Titan X (Pascal)
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080
Shader Units
38403584
3584
2560
ROPs96
96
88
64
GPUGP102GP102GP102GP104
Transistors12 Billion
12 Billion12 Billion7.2 Billion
Memory Size
12GB GDDR5X
12GB GDDR5X11GB GDDR5X8GB GDDR5X
Interface384-bit
384-bit352-bit256-bit
GPU Boost Clock Rate (MHz)1585
1531
1582
1733
Memory Clock Rate (MHz)1425
1250
1375
1250

Nvidia bolsters peak bandwidth compared to Titan X by populating GP102’s 384-bit memory interface with the same 11 Gb/s modules found on GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. The company even overclocks them slightly to 11.4 Gb/s, resulting in more than 547 GB/s of theoretical throughput (Titan X topped out at 480 GB/s; 1080 Ti nudged that up to 484 GB/s). After almost two years as the only gaming card to exceed 500 GB/s, AMD’s HBM-equipped Radeon R9 Fury X is eclipsed by Titan Xp. 

Similar to the 1080 Ti, Titan Xp boasts a typical GPU Boost frequency of 1582 MHz. Its base clock rate, however, is a more conservative 1405 MHz, according to GPU-Z. That’s a bit lower than Titan X’s 1417 MHz and a larger dip compared to 1080 Ti’s 1480 MHz, likely reflecting Titan Xp’s larger pool of active resources.

Titan Xp, Titan X, and GeForce GTX 1080 Ti all share the same layout. But whereas 1080 Ti’s PCB is fully populated, Titan Xp and Titan X utilize co-packaged high- and low-side MOSFETs from ON Semiconductor (NTMFD4C85N).

Also like Titan X, all 12 of Titan Xp’s memory emplacements are populated (vs. 1080 Ti’s 11).

A similar 250W board power calls for the same eight- and six-pin auxiliary power connectors, both of which face up, out of the card’s top. You can also see on the PCB where Quadro P6000’s eight-pin connector would attach, pointing straight back.

Titan Xp, From The Outside

Titan Xp looks just like this Titan X, minus the DVI outputTitan Xp looks just like this Titan X, minus the DVI output

If you were hoping for some sort of gussied-up exterior to show off that you spent $1200 on Nvidia’s latest and greatest, prepare for disappointment. Titan Xp is distinguishable from Titan X in exactly two ways. First, there’s a tiny sticker on the back plate with the card’s model. Second, Titan Xp sports the same I/O bracket as GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.

You get four display outputs, then, including three full-sized DisplayPort 1.2-certified interfaces (they’re DP 1.3/1.4-ready) and one HDMI 2.0b port. The original Titan X’s DVI connector is notably absent, facilitating more airflow through the bracket. Back when it launched 1080 Ti, Nvidia claimed the freer-flowing exhaust improved cooling and reduced noise. Our own Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB Review showed that card’s acoustic profile to be slightly different than Titan X, though not necessarily any better. Expect a similar experience from Titan Xp.

The good news for system builders is that any gaming PC designed to accommodate one of Nvidia’s Founders Edition boards will take the Titan Xp’s dimensions without a problem. The distance from the card’s slot cover to the end of its cooler spans 26.9cm. From the top of the motherboard slot to the top of the cooler, we measure 10.5cm. And with a depth of 3.5cm, Titan Xp fits nicely in a dual-slot form factor. Whereas our GeForce GTX 1080 Ti weighs in at 1039g, the Titan Xp’s 1072g is a bit heavier (matching the Titan X in our U.S. lab).

The external similarities between Titan X and Xp show a bit of laziness on Nvidia’s part. Despite the marketing department’s attempts to scrub gamer-oriented GeForce branding from this card’s name, there’s still a back-lit GeForce GTX logo on Titan Xp’s top edge. Further, Nvidia couldn’t be bothered to etch an extra ‘p’ on the shroud—it still reads Titan X.

MORE: Best Graphics Cards

MORE: Desktop GPU Performance Hierarchy Table

MORE: All Graphics Content

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
32 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • dstarr3
    Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. If all you need a GPU for is gaming, go one step down, save hundreds of dollars, at the cost of only a handful of FPS.
  • Other Comments
  • Anonymous
    With this card Nvidia completed the current generation of their graphic chips. They are onto new one...the best company out there.
  • TMTOWTSAC
    GPU makers are really going to have to hope QHD, 4k, machine learning, and VR really take off within the next 4 years.
  • dstarr3
    Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. If all you need a GPU for is gaming, go one step down, save hundreds of dollars, at the cost of only a handful of FPS.
  • AgentLozen
    Freak777power said:

    With this card Nvidia completed the current generation of their graphic chips. They are onto new one...the best company out there.


    I was thinking something similar while I was reading this. The Titan Xp represents the very furthest that the Pascal architecture can go. This current crop of cards from the 1050 to the Titan Xp will carry us to Volta's launch.

    (wait, isn't there a card even smaller than the 1050? /shrug)

    Edit: Why isn't this quote working?
    Edit2: Figured it out =)
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    "The Titan Xp represents the very furthest that the Pascal architecture can go. This current crop of cards from the 1050 to the Titan Xp will carry us to Volta's launch."
    I have to agree. Even though I don't like them as a company due to some of their business practices, I have to give them credit for being a stylish company that really pushes it and completes their line-ups - I like things to be *complete*... :-)
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    Thanks for putting in the effort for this review, Chris! Appreciate your contributions around here. :-)
  • bentonsl_2010
    Quote:

    (wait, isn't there a card even smaller than the 1050? /shrug)



    I believe you are talking about the 1030. This isn't really a gaming card however, it's more geared for e-sports streaming and HTPC type builds.
  • hannibal
    Could you test this card with a water block?
    This seems to be monster that would really benefit from that...
  • barryv88
    $500 for a measly increase over the Ti. Add another $200 premium that Gsync screens cost over Freesync ones, and you've happily payed +- $700 Nvidia tax for the "New coolest kid on the block" title.

    Yeaaaa. Thanks, but no thanks!
  • AgentLozen
    Quote:

    $500 for a measly increase over the Ti. Add another $200 premium that Gsync screens cost over Freesync ones, and you've happily payed +- $700 Nvidia tax for the "New coolest kid on the block" title.

    Yeaaaa. Thanks, but no thanks!


    You know if someone handed you a Titan Xp you would stick it right in your box without a second though.

    bentonsl2010 said:

    I believe you are talking about the 1030. This isn't really a gaming card however, it's more geared for e-sports streaming and HTPC type builds.


    Yes. That's the one.
    I mentioned it to illustrate that nVidia has a very wide portfolio with something for everyone. Pascal has been a terrific generation for nVidia.
  • artk2219
    Anonymous said:
    Quote:

    $500 for a measly increase over the Ti. Add another $200 premium that Gsync screens cost over Freesync ones, and you've happily payed +- $700 Nvidia tax for the "New coolest kid on the block" title.

    Yeaaaa. Thanks, but no thanks!


    You know if someone handed you a Titan Xp you would stick it right in your box without a second though.

    bentonsl2010 said:

    I believe you are talking about the 1030. This isn't really a gaming card however, it's more geared for e-sports streaming and HTPC type builds.


    Yes. That's the one.
    I mentioned it to illustrate that nVidia has a very wide portfolio with something for everyone. Pascal has been a terrific generation for nVidia.


    If someone handed me one, I would sell the crap out of it and get something else. Id much rather have someone pay me a bloated price and then use that money for something more reasonable. Heck that's exactly what I did when i sent in a GTX 580 to PNY and they sent me a 780. The 780 was neat at the time, but I much preferred the cash and a more reasonable card.
  • SirFlamenco
    Not at all..
  • Sam Hain
    Complete waste for just gaming applications, unless you just want the bragging rights of owning one or two...

    BUT at the same time advertising yourself as being a bit thick-brained in the decision making process, concerning the negligible-performance gains for the cost.

    NOTE: Great review as always!
  • Sam Hain
    Anonymous said:


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVjONzm3ceI These are the FE's being pounded against each other here in this comparo and the one you show.

    The Aorus and the Zotac AMP! (perhaps the two fastest Ti's avail in the U.S. unless I'm mistaken) would pull away even further with just stock boost-clock(s), depending on title and rig setup etc.
  • blppt
    For the love of God, AMD, get Vega out already. It seems like years since they've launched a high-end gaming card.
  • Kunra Zether
    I don't think someone who would buy this would care about $200 premium for gsync in fact they would probably be picking up two lol wish I had that kind of dough to drop on something like this.

    Yea I have to agree Pascal has been an awesome generation. Every card leapfrogged it's previous generation counterpart and I think Nvidia doesn't receive enough credit for this. They could have just made each card only perform 10% better and said here you go and still made sales but they didn't they gave us a wide variety to choose where we wanted to be. I mean I got a 1070 that beats out last gens 980ti for $382.00 a $800 card I mean come on you can't ask for more then that. I feel like AMD is taking forever to release Vega that by time they do Nvidia is going to be releasing Volta right next to it. I mean the 1070 is sitting on top of all of the AMD GPU s for what over a year now come on AMD we need some competition. If some one wants to hand me one I can vacate a slot for it ??
  • kyotokid
    ...as a 3D artist, still not worth the extra 500$ over a 1080 Ti. Great if your hobby is doing say climate, geologic, demographic, oceanographic modelling or deep learning for AI research.

    There needs to be more to entice CG enthusiasts and gamers to shell out an extra 71% in price than unlocking 2 more Stream processors, having 8 more ROPs, 3 MHz higher boost speed, 50 MHz higher memory clock rate, 256 additional Cores/shader units, and the extra 1 GB of VRAM over the 1080 TI (which shares the same processor at teh Titan XP, the GP 102).

    If it had HBM2 instead of DDR5X (offering a smaller form factor), or 24 GB of VRAM, that might be one reason to make some feel the price difference is worth it. As it stands now that extra 500$ is pretty much just for bragging rights.
  • sosofm
    Buy an Gigabyte 1080Ti Extreme , Zotac 1080Ti AMP! , with a little overclock and 500$ cheaper everybody have Titan XP.
  • Antonio_34
    Well, from not being a massive fan of Nvidia's marketing or pricing structure, I really hope that all the Nvidia fanboys go out and buy this one as I believe the complete waste in money would really be worth it to solidify their position of owning the best gpu on the market.