Radeon HD 5770, Radeon HD 4890, And GeForce GTX 275 Overclocked
Graphics Chips Compared And Test Setup
Each of our two MSI cards appears in this table three times. Both models are sold as OC editions, meaning that they run at overclocked speeds to begin with. Since the higher frequencies are coded into the BIOS, we consider them the cards’ stock frequencies, so they show up in the table under their normal model name. We also tested each of the cards at the reference speeds specified by Nvidia and ATI, respectively, labeling their scores as “No OC.”
In our third test, we tuned the factory overclocked MSI boards even further. This setting is labeled “Max OC” in the table. ATI’s Radeon HD 5770 is the only DirectX 11-capable card, and it uses ATI’s reference design. Its overclocked scores are marked as “OC” in the table, simultaneously representing the maximum overclock we achieved.
To put the score in context, we decided to add results from various cards that we have already tested running at stock speeds. To ensure that none of the cards was being held back by the CPU, we chose a Core i7-920 overclocked to 3.8 GHz as the heart of our testing platform.
A word of warning: these overclocking tests are by no means a recommendation for your hardware. Overclocking can damage your graphics card and may void your warranty. Make changes to your card’s clock speeds at your own risk.
Nvidia Graphics Cards
Manufacturer and Model Name | Code Name | Memory | GPU Frequency | Shader Model | Memory Frequency | SPs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GeForce GTX 295 | 2 x GT200b | 2 x 896MB GDDR3 | 576 MHz | 4.0, 1,242 MHz | 2 x 999 MHz | 2 x 240 |
GeForce GTX 285 | GT200b | 1,024MB GDDR3 | 648 MHz | 4.0, 1,476 MHz | 2 x 1,242 MHz | 240 |
GeForce GTX 280 | GT200 | 1024MB GDDR3 | 602 MHz | 4.0, 1,296 MHz | 2 x 1,107 MHz | 240 |
BFG GTX 275 (GTX 275) | GT200b | 896MB GDDR3 | 648 MHz | 4.0, 1,440 MHz | 2 x 1,152 MHz | 240 |
Gainward GTX275 Golden Sample (GTX 275) | GT200b | 896MB GDDR3 | 648 MHz | 4.0, 1,420 MHz | 2 x 1,185 MHz | 240 |
MSI N275GTX Lightning Max OC | GT200b | 1,792MB GDDR3 | 720 MHz | 4.0, 1,600 MHz | 2 x 1,200 MHz | 240 |
MSI N275GTX Lightning | GT200b | 1,792MB GDDR3 | 700 MHz | 4.0, 1,404 MHz | 2 x 1,150 MHz | 240 |
MSI N275GTX Lightning No OC | GT200b | 1,792MB GDDR3 | 633 MHz | 4.0, 1,404 MHz | 2 x 1,134 MHz | 240 |
GeForce GTX 275 | GT200b | 896MB GDDR3 | 633 MHz | 4.0, 1,404 MHz | 2 x 1,134 MHz | 240 |
MSI N260GTX Lightning BE (GTX 260 216SPs) | GT200b | 1,792MB GDDR3 | 680 MHz | 4.0, 1,458 MHz | 2 x 1,050 MHz | 216 |
Sparkle GeForce X265 (GTX 260 216SPs) | GT200b | 896MB GDDR3 | 666 MHz | 4.0, 1,476 MHz | 2 x 1,134 MHz | 216 |
Zotac GeForce GTX 260 (GTX 260 216SPs) | GT200b | 896MB GDDR3 | 576 MHz | 4.0, 1,242 MHz | 2 x 999 MHz | 216 |
GeForce GTX 260 | GT200b | 896MB GDDR3 | 576 MHz | 4.0, 1,242 MHz | 2 x 999 MHz | 216 |
GeForce GTX 260 | GT200 | 896MB GDDR3 | 576 MHz | 4.0, 1,242 MHz | 2 x 999 MHz | 192 |
Geforce GTX 250 | G92b | 1,024MB GDDR3 | 740 MHz | 4.0, 1,836 MHz | 2 x 1,100 MHz | 128 |
ATI Graphics Cards
Manufacturer and Model Name | Code Name | Memory | GPU Frequency | Shader Model | Memory Frequency | SPs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATI Radeon HD 5770 OC | Juniper | 1,024MB GDDR5 | 895 MHz | 5.0 | 4 x 1,430 MHz | 800 |
ATI Radeon HD 5770 | Juniper | 1,024MB GDDR5 | 850 MHz | 5.0 | 4 x 1,200 MHz | 800 |
Sapphire Toxic HD4890 1G Vapor-X (HD4890) | RV790 | 1,024MB GDDR5 | 960 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 1,050 MHz | 800 |
MSI R4890 Cyclone SOC max OC | RV790 | 1,024MB GDDR5 | 1,030 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 1,065 MHz | 800 |
MSI R4890 Cyclone SOC | RV790 | 1,024MB GDDR5 | 1,000 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 1,000 MHz | 800 |
MSI R4890 Cyclone SOC no OC | RV790 | 1,024MB GDDR5 | 850 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 975 MHz | 800 |
Radeon HD 4890 | RV790 | 1,024MB GDDR5 | 850 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 975 MHz | 800 |
Radeon HD 4870X2 | R700 (2 x RV770) | 2 x 1,024MB GDDR5 | 750 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 900 MHz | 800 |
Radeon HD 4870 | RV770 | 1,024 MB GDDR5 | 750 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 900 MHz | 800 |
HIS H487QT1GP ICEQ4+ (HD4870) | RV770 | 1,024MB GDDR5 | 770 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 1,000 MHz | 2 x 800 |
Sapphire Vapor-X HD4870 2G (HD4870) | RV770 | 2,048MB GDDR5 | 750 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 900 MHz | 800 |
Radeon HD 4870 | RV770 | 512MB GDDR5 | 750 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 900 MHz | 800 |
Radeon HD 4850 | RV770 | 512MB GDDR5 | 625 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 993 MHz | 800 |
Radeon HD 4830 | RV770 | 512MB GDDR5 | 575 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 900 MHz | 640 |
Radeon HD 4770 | RV740 | 512MB GDDR5 | 750 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 800 MHz | 640 |
SPs=Stream Processors, Shader 4.0 = DirectX 10, Shader 4.1 = DirectX 10.1, Shader 5.0 = DirectX 11
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Test Setup | |
---|---|
CPU | Intel Core i7-920 @ 3.8 GHz (20x190), BIOS 1.2625 Volt, 45 nm, Socket 1366 LGA |
Motherboard | Asus P6T, PCIe 2.0, ICH10R, 3-Way SLI |
Chipset | Intel X58 |
Memory | Corsair, 3 x 2GB DDR3, TR3X6G1600C8D, 2x570 MHz 8-8-8-20 |
Audio | Realtek ALC1200 |
LAN | Realtek RTL8111C |
HDDs | SATA, Western Digital, Raptor WD300HLFS, WD5000AAKS |
DVD | Gigabyte GO-D1600C |
Power Supply | Cooler Master RS-850-EMBA 850 Watts |
System Software and Drivers | |
Graphic Driver | ATI Catalyst 9.10, Nvidia GeForce 191.07 |
Operating System | Windows Vista Ultimate 32 Bit, SP1 |
DirectX | 9, 10, and 10.1 |
Platform Driver | Intel 9.1.0.1007 |
Current page: Graphics Chips Compared And Test Setup
Prev Page There's Always Some Headroom There... Next Page ATI Radeon HD 5770: Memory With A Need For Speed-
amdgamer666 Nice article. Ever since the 5770 came out I've been wondering how far someone could push the memory to relieve that bottleneck. Being able to push it to 1430 allows it to be competitive to it's older sibling and makes it enticing (with the 5700 series' extra features of course)Reply -
Onyx2291 Damn some of these cards run really well for 1920x1200 which I run at. Could pick up a lower one and run just about anything at a decent speed if I overclock well. Good ol charts :)Reply -
skora If you're trying to get to the next cards performance by OCing, shouldn't the 5850 be benched also? I know the 5770 isn't going to get there because of the memory bandwidth issue, but you missed the mark. One card is compared to its big brother, but the other two aren't.Reply
I am glad to see the 5770 produce playable frame rates at 1920x1200. Nice game selection also. -
quantumrand I'm really disappointed that they aren't any benchmarks from the 5870 or 5850 series included. Why even bother with tha GTX 295 or 4870x2 and such without the higher 5-series Radeons?Reply
I mean if I'm considering an ATI card, I'm going to want to compare the 5770 to the 5850 and 5870 just to see if that extra cost may be justified, not to mention the potential of a dual 5770 setup. -
presidenteody I don't care what this article says, when the 5870 or 5970 become available i am going to buy a few.Reply -
kartu Well, at least in Germany 4870 costs quite a bit less (30-40 Euros) compared to 5770. It would take 2+ years of playing to compensate for it with lower power consumption.Reply -
kartu "Power Consumption, Noise, And Temperature" charts are hard to comprehend. Show bars instead of numbers, maybe?Reply -
arkadi Well that put things in prospective. I was really happy with 260gtx numbers, and i can push my evga card even higher easy. To bad we didn't see the 5850 here, it looks like the optimal upgrade 4 gamers on the budget like my self. Grade article overall.Reply -
B16CXHatch I got lucky with my card. Before, I had a SuperClocked 8800GT from EVGA. I ordered a while back, a new EVGA GeForce GTX 275 (896MB). I figured the extra cash wasn't worth getting an overclocked model particularly when I could do it myself. I get it, I try to register it. The S/N on mine was a duplicate. They sent me an unused S/N to register with. I then check the speeds under one utility and it's showing GTX 275 SuperClocked speeds, not regular speeds. I check 2 more utilities and they all report the same. I had paid for a regular model and received a mislabeled SuperClocked. Flippin sweet.Reply
Now they also sell an SSC model which is overclocked even more. I used the EVGA precision tool to set those speeds and it gave me like 1 or 2 extra FPS is Crysis and F.E.A.R. 2 already played so well without overclocking. So overclocking on these bad boys doesn't really do much. Oh well.
One comment though, GTX 275's are HOT! Like, ridiculously hot. I open my window in 40 degree F weather and it'll still get warm in my room playing Team Fortress 2. -
With the 5970 out there seems to be nothing else about graphic cards that interests me anymore :D Its supposed to be the fastest card yet and beats Crysis too!Reply