AMD Radeon R9 Fury Review: Sapphire Tri-X Overclocked
Quickly following the Fury X, AMD’s next graphics foray is a cut-down Fiji called Fury, running at 1000MHz GPU clock. We tested Sapphire’s Tri-X Overclocked version.
Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
How We Test
Test System
Tom’s Hardware standardized the benchmarking test system across all of our various locations and reviewers for 2015. The idea being that we can compare the tests that everyone does and rule out any discrepancies from using different components. The PC we all use has an Intel Core i7-5930K, 16GB of DDR4, two 500GB SSDs from Crucial and an MSI X99S XPower motherboard. We also use an 850W Platinum-rated power supply from be quiet!, which gives us the headroom to test even the most power-hungry graphics cards.
Software & Drivers
We’ll be making use of the results recently garnered from our GTX 980 Ti and R9 Fury X evaluations. Some of the tests use different drivers. For instance, Nvidia's 352.90 build was used for all tests on the GTX 980 Ti. It was also used for all Nvidia GPUs while testing Grand Theft Auto V. All other games were tested with GeForce driver 347.84 for the Titan X, 980 and 780 Ti.
AMD’s Radeon R9 Fury X and Fury were both tested using Catalyst 15.15 Beta, since it was the only driver with support for Fiji when testing was conducted. Catalyst 15.5 Beta was used to test the 290X, as 15.15 does not support it.
As we noted earlier, though, two days before the Fury release, AMD published Catalyst 15.7. Igor managed to test GTA V, Shadow of Mordor, Battlefield 4, Metro Last Light and Thief. In all of his spot checks, there were no appreciable performance differences. The new driver primarily focuses on features like DX12 and Windows 10 support.
In addition to running all of the tests using Sapphire's stock settings, the Fury Tri-X was tested at AMD’s reference specifications, which gives us a nice baseline for comparing other reference-class Fury cards (like the other model Sapphire intends to launch). Sapphire pointed out that initial stock for these cards will be limited, while its lower-clocked model will be more obtainable.
Direct X | DirectX 11 |
---|---|
Graphics Drivers | GeForce GTX 980 Ti: Nvidia 352.90 Beta Driver All GeForce Cards in Grand Theft Auto V and The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt: Nvidia 352.90 Beta Driver GeForce GTX Titan X, 980, and 780 Ti in all other games: Nvidia 347.25 Beta Driver Radeon R9 290 X: AMD Catalyst 15.5 Beta Radeon R9 Fury X and Fury: AMD Catalyst 15.15 |
Benchmarks
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor | Built-in benchmark, 40-sec Fraps, Ultra preset |
---|---|
Battlefield 4 | Custom THG Benchmark, 100-sec Fraps, Ultra preset |
Metro Last Light | Built-in benchmark, 145-sec Fraps, Very High preset, 16x AF, Normal motion blur |
Tomb Raider | Version 1.01.748.0, Custom THG Benchmark, 40-sec Fraps, Ultimate preset |
Far Cry 4 | Version 1.9.0, Custom THG benchmark, 60-sec Fraps, Ultra preset |
Grand Theft Auto V | Build 350, Online 1.26, In-game benchmark sequence #5, 110-sec Fraps, FXAA: On, MSAA: 2x, Texture Quality: Very High, Shader Quality: Very High, Shadow Quality: High, Reflection Quality: Very High, Water Quality: High, Particles Quality: Very High, Grass Quality: High, Soft Shadows: Softer, Post FX: Very High, Anisotropic Filtering: 16x |
Noise
As usual, we’re using a high-quality measurement microphone that is positioned perpendicular to the center of the graphics card in question at a distance of 50cm for our noise measurements. Smaart v.7 is used for the analysis. The ambient noise at night during our measurements never exceeded 26dB(A) and was recorded and accounted for during each individual noise measurement.
Power Test System
Test Method | Contact-free DC Measurement at PCIe Slot (Using a Riser Card)Contact-free DC Measurement at External Auxiliary Power Supply Cable Direct Voltage Measurement at Power Supply Real-Time Infrared Monitoring and Recording |
---|---|
Test Equipment | 2 x HAMEG HMO 3054, 500MHz Digital Multi-channel Oscilloscope with Storage Function 4 x HAMEG HZO50 Current Probe (1mA-30A, 100kHz, DC) 4 x HAMEG HZ355 (10:1 Probes, 500MHz) 1 x HAMEG HMC 8012 Digital Multimeter with Storage Function 1 x Optris PI450 80Hz Infrared Camera + PI Connect |
Test System | Intel Core i7-5930K 4.2 GHz + Raijintek Triton All-In-One Water CoolerCrucial Ballistix Sport, 4x 4GB DDR4-2400MSI X99S XPower AC2x Crucial MX200 500GB SSD (System, Applications + Data, Storage)be quiet! Dark Power Pro 850WMicrocool Banchetto 101Windows 8.1 (Completely Updated) |
Drivers | AMD: Catalyst 15.5 Beta / 15.15 BetaNvidia: GeForce 353.06 WHQL |
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Kevin Carbotte is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware who primarily covers VR and AR hardware. He has been writing for us for more than four years.
Elon Musk reportedly wanted OpenAI to be a for-profit entity but has now sued to block the move
PlayStation 5 transformed into a laptop for $2,750 — Chinese modders made Sony's console more portable with a 17.3-inch 4K display weighing over 9 pounds
There's a budget GeForce GPU selling in China that not even Nvidia knew it made — RTX 4010 turns out to be a modified RTX A400 workstation GPU
-
Troezar Some good news for AMD. A bonus for Nvidia users too, more competition equals better prices for us all.Reply -
AndrewJacksonZA Kevin, Igor, thank you for the review. Now the question people might want to ask themselves is, is the $80-$100 extra for the Fury X worth it? :-)Reply -
vertexx When the @#$@#$#$@#$@ are your web designers going to fix the bleeping arrows on the charts????!!!!!Reply -
ern88 I would like to get this card. But I am currently playing at 1080p, but will probably got to 1440p soon!!!!Reply -
confus3d Serious question: does 4k on medium settings look better than 1080p on ultra for desktop-sized screens (say under 30")? These cards seem to hold a lot of promise for large 4k screens or eyefinity setups.Reply -
rohitbaran This is my next card for certain. Fury X is a bit too expensive for my taste. With driver updates, I think the results will get better.Reply -
Larry Litmanen Serious question: does 4k on medium settings look better than 1080p on ultra for desktop-sized screens (say under 30")? These cards seem to hold a lot of promise for large 4k screens or eyefinity setups.
I was in microcenter the other day, one of the very few places you can actually see a 4K display physically. I have to say i wasn't impressed, everything looked small, it just looks like they shrunk the images on PC.
Maybe it was just that monitor but it did not look special to the point where i would spend $500 on monitor and $650 for a new GPU.