Page 1:Why Limit Yourself?
Page 2:Motherboard And Processor
Page 3:Graphics And RAM
Page 4:Storage And Audio
Page 5:Case, Cooling, And Power
Page 6:Hardware Settings And Overclocking
Page 7:Benchmark Settings
Page 8:Benchmark Results: 3D Games
Page 9:Benchmark Results: Encoding and other Applications
Page 11:Performance Analysis
Storage And Audio
Four 1.0TB Samsung Spinpoint F1 Hard Drives
Our highest-priced system is meant to do all things well, so there are a few significant differences between it and any "Ultimate Gaming" system. To begin with, gaming systems typically only need a few hundred gigabytes of storage, while somewhat similar multi-tasking configurations must have enough capacity to store large video files. Thus, while we could have easily chosen two 300 GB 10,000 RPM drives, we instead aimed for a 4 TB array.
Samsung has recently expanded its Spinpoint F1 product line with models that target standard desktops, RAID arrays, and low-power systems. The bad news is that NewEgg was only carrying the standard version at the time of our build. However, this isn’t a problem for us since previous tests have shown that the performance difference, though measurable, isn’t practically discernable.
Now that we have 4 TB to work with, the question of what kind of RAID array to use comes into play. Placing all four drives in level-zero mode (RAID 0) would maximize capacity and throughput while risking lost data. Mirroring two twin-drive level-zero arrays to create a RAID 0+1 configuration would provide 100% redundancy with relatively low CPU overhead on our chipset’s software RAID controller, but at half the theoretical maximum throughput and capacity. A RAID 5 array would be the best compromise of transfer performance, capacity, and redundancy, but would hog CPU cycles in the calculation of parity bits. Since this is a performance shootout, we chose level-zero.
Had this been a $5,000 PC, we would have considered adding a hardware RAID controller card. Furthermore, this is the only place where we were forced to compromise an otherwise ideal build. We should also note that the on-board Intel controller is capable of excellent RAID 5 performance–even though processor load could be significant, our Core 2 Quad has power to spare since most applications can’t use all four cores.
LG Electronics GGW-H20L HD DVD-ROM/Blu-ray Disk Burner
A do-everything PC must be able to use the latest media formats, and if we had to choose between Blu-ray disk and the now-defunct HD DVD standards, we’d easily choose the survivor of that format war. Fortunately, Lucky Goldstar made such decisions unnecessary in its well-priced multi-format drives.
The GGW-H20L is among the least-expensive BD-RE drives on the market, so we’re not paying extra for the HD DVD reading capability. And since the HD DVD capability is free, buyers might want to take advantage of close-out prices on movies in this format.
A lower price doesn’t mean inferior performance, either. The GGW-H20L features class-leading write speeds of 6x for BD-R and 16x for DVD-R media. Anyone looking for faster DVD-R writes will have to add a second drive, since DVD burners without Blu-Ray capabilities have now reached 22x burn speeds.
Asus Xonar DX Audio Card
In spite of what Mark Twain said, familiarity doesn’t always breed contempt. We’ve been so pleased with the Asus Xonar DX audio card that we’ve carried it through several System Builder Marathons. This product became our primary choice after it became obvious that a poorly-placed power connector on the slightly better Xonar D2X caused it not to fit our previous high-end configurations.
On the other hand, William Shakespeare was right to say love is blind. Our appreciation of the Xonar DX design and performance caused us to overlook that Asus had designed its X48 motherboard with a PCI, rather than a PCI Express slot, at the top. The card works as expected, but in the bottom slot. Installation was less convenient, as was power cable management.
A PCI version of the Xonar D2X, called the Xonar D2, doesn’t require any additional power connection. Without any power connector to block the DIMM slots, the Xonar D2 would have easily fit the upper PCI slot. The Xonar D2’s slightly superior specifications would have made it the perfect choice for the top PCI slot.
Even if budget limits had prevented us from using the slightly better Xonar D2 PCI, a PCI version of the less-expensive Xonar DX was also available. The Xonar D1 offers the same benefits in slot position and cable management as the more-expensive Xonar D2, but at the lower price of the Xonar DX.