Skip to main content

System Builder Marathon: The $4,500 Super PC

Benchmark Results: 3D Games

Crysis

Crysis was a little too choppy at our panel’s 2560x1600 native resolution, but overclocking made it smooth enough for some players. Enabling anti-aliasing again caused excessive choppiness even for the overclocked configuration, but it’s really hard to see aliasing at 2560x1600. Our choice would be to use the overclocked configuration at 1920x1200 pixels, with anti-aliasing enabled.

Supreme Commander

Without anti-aliasing, Supreme Commander appears to be CPU-limited until one considers how small the difference is between the base speed and overclocked configurations. Perhaps it’s limited by memory bandwidth instead? Enabling anti-aliasing revealed the limitations of our graphics cards, but the game was playable at all settings.

Unreal Tournament 3 shows a more realistic CPU-limited performance curve at its highest normal settings. For this particular game, anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering must be forced through drivers, and doing so reveals the limits of our graphics cards. Forcing anisotropic filtering really "wakes up" the visual presentation of this game, and we achieved a superb 115 frames-per-second at our 30" flat panel display’s native resolution.

World in Conflict also appears to be CPU-limited, but a minimum of 43 frames per second at stock system speed doesn’t appear to be much of a hindrance. The game supports AA and AF adjustments, though a missing 8x AF setting caused us to choose 16x instead.

  • cjdavis7
    So, how many times can they drop NewEgg's name in one article?
    Reply
  • Duncan NZ
    I'd drop Neweggs name lots if they gave me a $4500 system
    Reply
  • cangelini
    cjdavis7So, how many times can they drop NewEgg's name in one article?
    The reason we partnered up with NewEgg on this was to have access to a much wider range of hardware then we'd otherwise have. My hope is that this is an asset to our readers and does not interfere editorially.
    Reply
  • cangelini
    Duncan NZI'd drop Neweggs name lots if they gave me a $4500 system
    Just to clarify, all of the hardware goes straight back to NewEgg once the story is done. The arrangement simply gives us access to the hardware, straight from e-tail, to build, benchmark, and write about. It's good for us because we're saved the effort of finding manufacturers who want to send out their hardware and we think it's good for our readers because we can construct the systems we'd *really* build on these budgets. =)
    Reply
  • master9716
    4500 . Why would anyone spend 800 on a case? I dont really see a point to the article but oh well . New egg does have the best prices out there but mwave does beat it sometimes.
    Reply
  • cangelini
    master97164500 . Why would anyone spend 800 on a case? I dont really see a point to the article but oh well . New egg does have the best prices out there but mwave does beat it sometimes.
    Why would anyone spend $500 on a video card or $1,000 on a processor? ;-)

    This is why we do three stories with a trio of price targets--something for everyone!
    Reply
  • neiroatopelcc
    Anyone more concerned with looks and styling than just function would spend more than a few bucks on a case.
    ie. Anyone who'd pick an alfa romeo or a lexus over an ordinary honda accord would want a more expensive case.
    Reply
  • neiroatopelcc
    We should also note that the on-board Intel controller is capable of excellent RAID 5 performancePerhaps I'm mistaken, but I am not thrilled by the intel raid controller. Perhaps the ich10 is better than the ich9 in this regard, but I only scored about 90mb/sec max read speed in raid5 (5x500gb) on my p35. That's the same speed as my 3x 35gb raptors in raid 0 on my secondary system, so it's okay. But still. A single new spinpoint is faster than the raid 5, so I'm quite sure my ich9r controller is requiring too many resources to work properly fast. Or it's my oc that causes it to slow down somehow. Dunno yet.
    Anyway, my experience with intel software raid running raid5 isn't that it's speedy.

    ps. wouldn't it have made sense to save a few bucks on storage (2x1,5tb or something) and added memory cooling blocks to go with the water cooled chassis?
    Reply
  • randomizer
    Memory doesn't get hot enough to justify losing 2TB of storage just so you can add some fancy cooling blocks to it. 4TB does sound pretty sweet, but I don't know how I'd fill up 500GB let alone 8x that. E-peen I guess.
    Reply
  • neiroatopelcc
    "2.) The Cooler Master CMPSU-1000HX power supply has ferrite rings on the flat, removable PCI Expresshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_Express power cables that prevented them from being run between cards. We had to use the soldered-on "round" cables for the top card."

    it's still a corsair psu according to the picture. (page 6)


    @ randomizer : If you'd replace the 4 drives with 2 bigger ones you'd only lose 1tb of storage, and half your theoretical read/write speed (and slightly improve your seek time). Anyway, if memory is running hot I would definetly want some cooling for it. My first choice would be to throw away the sound card and see if 90 bucks was enough for a decent cooler (onboard sound is excellent really), but since toms is rather happy about the sound, I think storage is the best place to compromise.

    Anyway, my point is - add a cooler to the modules! actually ocz already have models out there with watercooling built in - since they picked ocz they could've gotten those if newegg had em.

    Reply