Crucial T705 2TB SSD Review: The Fastest SSD on The Planet

Crucial T705 delivers another first for retail SSDs.

Crucial T705 2TB SSD
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Comparison Products

The Crucial T705 will always be compared to the Crucial T700, the first PCIe 5.0 SSD we tested that could achieve 12 GB/s and also the fastest SSD we had tested at the time. Crucial has also outdone itself with the popular T500, a budget-oriented PCIe 4.0 SSD that surprised us with its numbers. It certainly seems more exciting than the Samsung 990 EVO.

Is it worth leveling up over the best PCIe 4.0 SSDs? Check what the WD Black SN850X, the Samsung 990 Pro, and Solidigm P44 Pro can deliver as the best drives of that type that we’ve tested. The Acer Predator GM7000 and Adata Legend 960 Max are no slouches, either. For the budget-oriented, there’s the Teamgroup MP44 and the latest in QLC technology, the HP FX700. If you’re considering upgrading over your reliable PCIe 3.0 SSD, the Samsung 970 EVO Plus is the gold standard for comparison.

We don't have a bunch of other PCIe 5.0 SSDs in our charts, as they're basically equal to our slightly slower than the T700. However, if you're wondering, we've previously reviewed the Adata Legend 970, Corsair MP700, Gigabyte Aorus Gen5 10000 and Gen5 12000, Inland TD510, Nextorage NE5N and NN5Pro, Seagate FireCuda 540, and Teamgroup Z540. All of those use the same combination of Phison E26 controller with Micron 232-layer TLC NAND, though the various models have either 1600 MT/s or 2000 MT/s NAND speeds.

Shane Downing
Contributing Writer

Shane Downing is a Contributing Writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering consumer storage, PC hardware, and AI.

  • PEnns
    Sounds great. But...what did Crazy Eddy say (those who were born before the 1990s will remember him ;)) ?

    Those Prices Are Insane!!
    Reply
  • Notton
    I'm kind of curious. Who buys these top end Gen5 drives?
    A top end Gen4 is significantly cheaper and is only microseconds slower at loading Windows/Games.
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    'The 4TB option is especially nice as it’s been challenging to find that much flash in the very fastest drives. This drive is certainly one of those, capable of reaching up to 14,500 / 12,700 MB/s for sequential reads and writes and up to 1,550K / 1,800K random read and write IOPS. '

    Might just be the way I'm reading it, but you mention the 4TB and then go on to describe it using the speeds of the 2TB version.

    Sorry, I'm being pedantic.
    Reply
  • gg83
    Where is the majority of the cost from? The controller? Do gen 5 drives use the same nand as gen4? Maybe thicker pcb and more expensive metals?
    Reply
  • warezme
    gg83 said:
    Where is the majority of the cost from? The controller? Do gen 5 drives use the same nand as gen4? Maybe thicker pcb and more expensive metals?
    Greed.
    Reply
  • kiniku
    Admin said:
    The Crucial T705 is a very fast, if very expensive, PCIe 5.0 SSD. If you want the all-around fastest SSD on the planet, this is it for now, although that ownership comes at a price.

    Crucial T705 2TB SSD Review: The Fastest SSD on The Planet : Read more
    I am pleased with my T700 purchase. $299.00 for 2TB? Are you kidding me? In 3 years it will be $169.00 on Black Friday.
    Reply
  • kiniku
    Notton said:
    I'm kind of curious. Who buys these top end Gen5 drives?
    A top end Gen4 is significantly cheaper and is only microseconds slower at loading Windows/Games.
    Many users are moving large files back and forth, or are manipulating them, and every second saved can make a difference. But for most of us gamers you're right, the experienced delta and cost thereof isn't worth it. Having the "fastest" is an early adopter tax for those with deep pockets that the manufacturer is hoping will help them recoop their development costs, aka the price of developing, manufacturing, and offering the "fastest".
    Reply
  • anonymousdude
    Notton said:
    I'm kind of curious. Who buys these top end Gen5 drives?
    A top end Gen4 is significantly cheaper and is only microseconds slower at loading Windows/Games.

    People with deep pockets and people who chase after specs. The only people that benefit from these drives at the moment are those with workloads where it benefits them or outright requires them. On other words, you use it for work where every second matters, your company has more money than sense, or some combination of both.
    Reply
  • BillyBuerger
    Their pricing with/without heatsink seems a bit random. Assuming they use the same heat sink for the different models, you would expect the same price increase to include it. But it's not. It's $20 extra for the 1TB and $40 extra for 2TB and 4TB according to the article pricing. I checked Crucial's site and it lists the non-heatsink 4TB for $714 which is only $16 extra for the heat sink. WTF?
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    I feel like we should have some benchmarks of Optane U.2 drives included with these results :D
    Reply