Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands (DirectX 12)
A roughly 8% advantage over Radeon RX 460 isn’t enough to make the RX 560 perfectly smooth through our Ghost Recon Wildlands benchmark using the Medium preset.
Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1050 isn’t altogether that much more playable, though it does achieve 6%-higher average frame rates than the RX 560. GTX 1050 Ti is about 12% faster than the vanilla 1050, essentially tying Radeon RX 570.
That the 570 is only 19% faster than RX 560 contrasts sharply to what we just saw in The Witcher 3.
MORE: Best Graphics Cards
MORE: Desktop GPU Performance Hierarchy Table
MORE: All Graphics Content
I meant this card since it’s 1050 ti price while offering 1050 performance.
Is that why you waited almost half a year to review the card? :3
Did you read the review?
At the beginning of the conclusion:
The minimal arch (even with the extra CUs) can't use 4GB for gaming like the big brother 570. The 2GB RX 560 even trades blows with its 4GB twin, along with the 2GB GTX 1050, at the $110-$120 price point for the gamer bunch.
Leave the RX 560 4GB for the "Entrepreneurial Capitalist" crowd ...
Also, I wish the RX 560 came in a low-profile version, like the RX 460 did (and the GTX 1050 Ti does). This excludes it from certain applications. It's the most raw compute available at that price & power dissipation.
Whatever Amd is doing with their architecture and leadership in the GPU division needs to change. I can't even think of a time 2 years ago and before where nvidia ever offered a better value.