AOC Q2781PQ IPS/QHD Monitor Review

Early Verdict

There are lots of rank-and-file displays available that perform well but few do it with the style and reliability of the AOC Q2781PQ. Its combination of excellent performance, build quality, and value is sure to appeal to many users. Brand loyalists will certainly want to check it out. It needs a bit of tweaking to extract maximum performance but the result is well worth it. Those needing reliable performance without a lot of expensive bells and whistles would be wise to add it to their short lists.

Pros

  • +

    Excellent post-calibration accuracy

  • +

    IPS panel

  • +

    QHD resolution

  • +

    Styling

  • +

    Build quality

  • +

    Value

Cons

  • -

    Out-of-box accuracy

  • -

    Contrast

  • -

    No speakers or USB

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Features & Specifications

We review a lot of gaming displays, but many users simply want a basic screen at a good price. When you strip away things like fast refresh, adaptive sync, and enthusiast-oriented styling, you're left with just a fundamental display. For most of us, 60Hz is just fine, and the only real nod to luxury is an IPS panel.

To that end, today we’re looking at a member of AOC’s style line, the Q2781PQ. It offers a 27” IPS panel with a thin bezel, minimalist stand, a modern aesthetic, and most importantly, QHD resolution. And it sells for a decent, if not rock-bottom price.

Specifications

Back in 2012, we reviewed AOC’s I2757Fh. It was one of the first 27” IPS monitors to sell at a reasonable price. IPS has always come with a cost premium and that still holds true today. Even though the technology has penetrated every display category, it still commands higher prices than comparable TN monitors. The I2757Fh offered slick, minimalist styling and excellent viewing angles, but in order to maintain value, it employed the more common (at the time) FHD (1920x1080) resolution. Today’s users are less likely to accept anything less than QHD (2560x1440) in a new screen, so to that end, we have the Q2781PQ.

There are no amazing features to report here. What you get for around $350 is a high-quality IPS panel part made by LG Display with a white LED backlight, 8-bit native color, and a nicely styled chassis that easily blends in with the modern home office. A few things like speakers and USB ports have been omitted, but you do get flexible connectivity, reasonable out-of-box accuracy, and easy setup. If you need a basic display that can function well in a corporate or family environment, the Q2781PQ might be just the ticket. Let’s take a closer look.

Packaging, Physical Layout & Accessories

The carton and protective foam are more than up to the challenges of shipping. Those mail-ordering their new AOC should have little cause for concern. The monitor comes completely assembled with an integrated stand/upright that connects to the back of the panel. To keep the chassis thin, the power supply is external, housed in a small brick. Bundled cables include DisplayPort and HDMI. There's a printed quick-start guide, and the user manual and supporting software can be downloaded from AOC’s website.

Product 360

The Q2781PQ is billed by AOC as “frameless,” but it makes no attempt to hide the fact that there is in fact an 8mm flush bezel around the image, which you can clearly see in the photos. We have yet to see a truly zero-frame LCD panel, even in commercial applications, but AOC has one of the thinnest designs we’ve seen so far. The front layer is the same 3H-hardness plastic found in nearly every panel today and boasts excellent clarity coupled with effective reflection control.

Control buttons are in an unconventional position between the center and left side of the bezel. The down-facing buttons, which click solidly, are marked by tiny icons that are nearly impossible to see. Luckily, they’re just like every other AOC monitor we’ve worked with and therefore easy to figure out.

The panel is permanently attached to a solid aluminum base upright that reminds us of a paperclip. It looks spindly in the photos but is actually quite solid. The pivot point offers 16° backward tilt and 2° forward but no swivel, height, or portrait adjustment. Fortunately, the screen’s height is ideal for the typical desktop, and we had no trouble positioning it for optimal image quality. Once adjusted, there is no wobble or play. The whole package feels very solid and of high quality.

The panel is extremely thin at only 15mm for most of its height, but a bulge at the bottom increases the total depth to 38mm. If you’re concerned about wall-mounting, don’t be, because it can’t be done. There is no VESA mount nor any provision to remove the stand, so those who favor monitor arms will have to look elsewhere.

The back is completely smooth and featureless, and is finished in high-gloss black. Rather than hiding the inputs on a down-facing panel, they are easily accessible in the lower-right quadrant. Connections include a single DisplayPort 1.2, two HDMI 1.4, and a VGA port. You also get a headphone output. There are no built-in speakers or USB ports.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: Best Professional Monitors

MORE: How We Test Monitors

MORE: How To Choose A Monitor

MORE: All Monitor Content

Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

  • SteveRNG
    I get why people call out the monitor makers when they call a monitor bezel-free and it's not. And I get why people who do multiple-monitor gaming would want bezel-free. But until the display actually has NO bezel, does bezel thickness matter at all? It seems that if there is any bezel, it might as well be an inch wide and help prevent backlight bleed.
    Reply
  • dstarr3
    19819450 said:
    I get why people call out the monitor makers when they call a monitor bezel-free and it's not. And I get why people who do multiple-monitor gaming would want bezel-free. But until the display actually has NO bezel, does bezel thickness matter at all? It seems that if there is any bezel, it might as well be an inch wide and help prevent backlight bleed.

    Generally, I agree. There's no functional point if there is more than zero bezel thickness. But I'll admit, a thin bezel does just look better aesthetically. If I had to choose between two monitors that were equal in every way, except one had a thinner bezel, I'd go with the thinner bezel.
    Reply
  • drwho1
    To me not having speakers is a plus since I like to use my own set of speakers... real speakers. Overall I will keep this in mind when ready to upgrade.
    Reply
  • MasterMace
    hoping for an ips 120hz 4k in the 24 and 27 brackets
    Reply
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    I personally would rather have downward-facing inputs. It puts less stress on the connector.
    Reply
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    19821946 said:
    hoping for an ips 120hz 4k in the 24 and 27 brackets

    Not sure I would want 4K in a 24" monitor. That would make for some really tiny text/icons. I would only go with 4K in 27"/28" and above sizes.
    Reply
  • photonboy
    2BE_OR_NOT2BE,
    I'm not sure I agree that "downward-facing inputs" are better. With this monitor the cables can come from the back of the desk like you would a DVD player. With the downwards style you'd be forced to bend the cable more thus putting MORE stress on the connector not less.

    Personally, I prefer to have a mount that lets you hide and tie off the video cable in the rear, middle area.
    Reply