ATI Radeon HD 5870: DirectX 11, Eyefinity, And Serious Speed
-
Page 1:Introduction
-
Page 2:Cypress Measures Up
-
Page 3:Double Or Nothing
-
Page 4:Stepping Through The Architecture
-
Page 5:Cypress Becomes The Radeon HD 5800-Series
-
Page 6:DirectX 11: More Notable Than DirectX 10?
-
Page 7:DirectCompute
-
Page 8:Eyefinity: A Tangible Benefit, Today
-
Page 9:Multimedia: Mostly The Same, Plus High-Def Audio
-
Page 10:System Setup And Benchmarks
-
Page 11:Benchmark Results: 3DMark Vantage
-
Page 12:Benchmark Results: S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky
-
Page 13:Benchmark Results: Crysis
-
Page 14:Benchmark Results: Far Cry 2
-
Page 15:Benchmark Results: Left 4 Dead
-
Page 16:Benchmark Results: World In Conflict
-
Page 17:Benchmark Results: H.A.W.X.
-
Page 18:Benchmark Results: Resident Evil 5
-
Page 19:Benchmark Results: Grand Theft Auto IV
-
Page 20:Power Consumption
-
Page 21:Heat And Noise
-
Page 22:Conclusion
Cypress Becomes The Radeon HD 5800-Series
ATI is announcing two graphics cards today, the Radeon HD 5870 and the Radeon HD 5850.
Radeon HD 5870, on the bench, but in very limited supply, partners tell us.
For the time being, the 5870 will be ATI’s flagship offering. Armed with the Cypress graphics processor and its full 1600 ALUs intact and running at 850 MHz, the board is capable of up to 2.72 TFLOPS of compute performance. This is The Full Monty, with 80 texture units, what ATI refers to as 32 ROPs, and 1GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1,200 MHz. With a 4.8 Gb/s data rate, that’s 153.6 GB/s of throughput. you'll notice that this isn't a huge increase from the Radeon HD 4890. ATI claims that when the 4890 was bottlenecked, it was held back by compute performance rather than memory bandwidth. The 5870 is purportedly a better-balanced board as a result.
ATI rates the Radeon HD 5870 at 27W idle and 188W active. Compare that to the Radeon HD 4890, which sucked down 90W idle and up to 160W while active. We’ll get into just how the company cuts power consumption so drastically in just a moment, though.
The Radeon HD 5870 is a large card—longer than ATI’s already-gargantuan 4870 X2 at 11” (versus 10.5”), and just as wide, filling two expansion slots. It’s covered front and back with a black plastic shroud. The red piping and intake-looking ports on the back are purely cosmetic, as the only way to get air into the blower-type cooler is on the side of the board. This presents a challenge when it comes to cooling the first card in a CrossFire configuration without three slots between boards, and indeed led us to hit 100 degrees Celsius under load, throttling the cards.
Like whistle tips, those two rear vents are just for decoration.
Exhausting air isn’t much easier as a result of the 5870’s populous I/O panel. As you already know, most dual-slot boards sport a number of display outputs across one of the slots, while a vent generally spans the length of the other. Here, however, you have one DisplayPort, one HDMI, and one dual-link DVI output across one slot and a second dual-link DVI connector covering half of the second. As a result, you get just over an inch and a half of ventilation for hot air. That’s not enough, so ATI also allows air to exhaust out the top of the board, into your chassis. Next to that top-vent is a pair of CrossFire connectors, used to sling as many as four cards together.
Radeon HD 5850, not yet ready for prime time.
The second card, the Radeon HD 5850, sports a 725 MHz Cypress processor with two of its SIMD arrays disabled, yielding 1,440 ALUs (18 arrays times 16 stream processors times 5 ALUs). Because the texture units are tied to the SIMD cores, the 5850 loses eight of those as well, taking the total to 72. All of the GPUs render back-ends remain in place though, so the pixel fillrate and Z/stencil rates are affected only by the lower clock rate. Also armed with 1GB of GDDR5 memory, the Radeon HD 5850’s frame buffer runs at 1 GHz, yielding a 4 Gb/s data rate and 128 GB/s total bandwidth.
The same optimizations help keep power consumption down to 27W at idle, and lower 3D clocks bring the maximum board power down to 170W.
If the scale of product photography is to be believed, the 5850 will be a shorter board, through still a dual-slot part. Unfortunately the 5850s weren’t ready for launch, but we’ll have a review posted as soon as the cards arrive. Keep an eye on this one—with a retail price of $259 and performance also claimed to be faster of the GeForce GTX 285, Nvidia might have some serious catching-up to do.
- Introduction
- Cypress Measures Up
- Double Or Nothing
- Stepping Through The Architecture
- Cypress Becomes The Radeon HD 5800-Series
- DirectX 11: More Notable Than DirectX 10?
- DirectCompute
- Eyefinity: A Tangible Benefit, Today
- Multimedia: Mostly The Same, Plus High-Def Audio
- System Setup And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: 3DMark Vantage
- Benchmark Results: S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky
- Benchmark Results: Crysis
- Benchmark Results: Far Cry 2
- Benchmark Results: Left 4 Dead
- Benchmark Results: World In Conflict
- Benchmark Results: H.A.W.X.
- Benchmark Results: Resident Evil 5
- Benchmark Results: Grand Theft Auto IV
- Power Consumption
- Heat And Noise
- Conclusion
Ran it against a GTX 295 and a 285 and 285s in SLI
Just wish the darn thing wasn't so big, but man, what a card! Now I'm thinking about a bigger case
Crysis 2 on an x2 of this is exactly what I'm waiting for.
This is not to say I am an Nvidia fan, just undoubtedly you would do well for yourself to hold off for a bit if you want to buy a 5000 series... as the price will come down for a good price/performance ratio soon enough.
Ran it against a GTX 295 and a 285 and 285s in SLI
Just wish the darn thing wasn't so big, but man, what a card! Now I'm thinking about a bigger case
Jasper,
TBH, the architectural details are secondary to how the card performs. However, if you'd like a better idea of what tessellation can do for you, check out the picture of the Alien on page six!