Updated Specs, Features Revealed For 'Call Of Duty: WWII' On PC
Activision’s marquee franchise will have a new installment next week. Prior to the launch of Call of Duty: WWII, Sledgehammer Games addressed the PC gaming community on Steam with updates on hardware requirements and improvements to features that will be available at launch.
The hardware specs have somewhat changed since the PC beta in late September. Notable additions to the chart include an AMD CPU for the minimum category and higher storage requirements. The beta, with its limited content, required only 25GB of storage, but the final version of Call of Duty: WWII needs an astounding 90GB of free space. That number puts it in the same ranks as Forza Motorsport 7 and Middle-earth: Shadow of War in terms of titles that require large amounts of space on your storage drive.
| Call of Duty: WWII | Minimum | Recommended (1080p, 60 fps) |
|---|---|---|
| CPU |
|
|
| GPU |
|
|
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB |
| Storage | 90GB | 90GB |
| OS | Windows 7 (64-bit) or later | N/A |
| API | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
Beta players had PC-specific features available such as the ability to play in 4K, use an ultra-wide monitor, adjust the framerate cap (up to 250 fps) and alter the field of view. Sledgehammer said that in the wake of the beta, it increased the field of view slider range across different aspect ratios so that those playing on an ultra-wide monitor won’t have an unfair advantage. The developers also added that the game will have G-Sync and FreeSync support, fully remappable keys, and “advanced video settings.” As a final treat, the aim assist feature is disabled so you’ll have to rely solely on your skills to get the top spot at each match.
A multiplayer-heavy title such as Call of Duty: WWII comes with a plethora of cheat and hacking safeguards to give all players an equal footing during combat. Unfortunately, the full set of preventive measures wasn’t available during the beta. However, the studio assured fans that it will be active (along with some new upgrades) at launch, so you'll probably see some bans handed out within the first few hours of gameplay.
If you already placed a preorder for the game on PC, you can start downloading it today. Depending on your available bandwidth at home, a 90GB download can take anywhere from one to several hours, so plan accordingly. Call of Duty: WWII launches on Friday, November 3.
| Name | Call of Duty: WWII |
|---|---|
| Type | First-person shooter |
| Developer | Sledgehammer Games |
| Publisher | Activision |
| Platforms | PC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One |
| Where To Buy | |
| Release Date | November 3, 2017 |
You'd Also Like
-
System Requirements Revealed For 'Hunt: Showdown,' Now In Early Access
Tom's Hardware -
Rare Publishes 'Sea Of Thieves' PC Requirements
Tom's Hardware -
Everything You Need To Know About The First Expansion For 'Destiny 2' (Updated)
Tom's Hardware -
Online Issues Continue To Haunt 'Call Of Duty: WWII' (Updated)
Tom's Hardware
Well, I'm sure that'd compress to a mere 2-night download.
Oh i thought that was the full download. Ok that makes sense, so it's more like 60GB of something?
Not sure, it varies from game to game. But yeah, the download size is always smaller than the install size because of compression. Download size could be half the install size easy. I've seen games that download 1GB and decompress to 9GB.
I wonder if it will play with any of AMD's FX chips or not, an FX 9590 is roughly like an r5 1400. Actually, those specs are kind of weird, a Ryzen 1600x would ROFL stomp an i5 2400, heck even the r5 1400 would do that, yet that's the minimum spec? An FX 8350 should do the same to an I3 3225 in anything even semi decently threaded, or even an FX 6300 or 6350. Maybe the game is completely unoptimized for AMD hardware?
https://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1281?vs=1267
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:World_War_II_first-person_shooters
The first Call of Duty was in 2003 and with 5 Call of Duty's released since then it breaks down to a WW2 game every 3.4 years, not including either of the Modern Warfare's.
Do we really need a new World War 2 game every 3.4 years (1.7 years)?
Call of Duty:WW2 is almost a pun on how repetitive Call of Duty is seeing how the vast majority of the other titles were also based during World War 2.
On a different note, wasn't the point of gaming on an ultra-wide monitor to get an unfair advantage?
the point of this game is that the promise that groups and clans can again have private servers with their own preferred gaming rules; Crouch and ADS for example over the commonly Xbox generation run and gun bunny hopping player.
pre-orders months ago, and just can wait to get the clan server running.
A "realistic" Korean contemporary or 1950s style game would be more appealing right now. And what's with the DX11 only renderer? That's like retro on the tech too.
World at War came out in 2008...?
Prob take me no time at all on my google gig connection haha but wont be getting this game
LOL those are days where you go to your local coffee shop to download the entire game. :P