Nvidia RTX 4090 supplies are dwindling, prices skyrocketing as likely RTX 5090 launch approaches
Making way for the new king of the hill.
We've seen a series of big Prime Day October sales this week on PC components, but rather than going on sale, RTX 4090 cards are actually more expensive than they were just a few weeks ago. Where you could find an RTX 4090 for $1,599 or so in July, now $1,799 is the cheapest we're seeing with most models more expensive and many out of stock. Could Nvidia have stopped making them?
Nvidia's GeForce RTX 4090 has had a good run, but it's now approaching the finish line and getting ready to hang up its hat. It remains the fastest graphics card for the time being, but two years after the initial launch, most people on the outside looking in might be shocked to discover that a 4090 now costs more than it did two years back. But this is all par for the course for Nvidia's halo products.
Recently, we reported on news that German retailers were seeing dwindling RTX 4090 supplies. It's not just Germany, though: RTX 4090 supplies seem to be drying up around the world. That's having a knock-on effect for both 4090 pricing as well as the penultimate RTX 4080 Super prices, but logic and business both suggest this is the most sensible path forward. We've seen this all before, nearly every graphics card generation in fact.
When the RTX 2080 Ti launched at $1,199 initially, we never saw much in the way of the promised $999 cards. By the time RTX 2080 Ti was due for retirement, supplies had mostly run out and the cards remained expensive right up to the last minute. Almost the exact same scenario played out with the RTX 3090 Ti, RTX 3090, and RTX 3080 GPUs two years later. Pricing remained high until the very end.
Ethereum miners and pandemic influenced shortages were definitely extra factors with the past two GPU generations, but I can't recall the last time I saw a massive discount on an outgoing high-end/enthusiast Nvidia GPU. The company has been very successful overall in clearing out old inventory to make way for the new.
Gigabyte RTX 4090 Gaming OC: now $1,799 at Newegg
We reviewed the Gigabyte 4090 back when the GPU launched and you could find it for $1,699. Two years later, it costs $100 more — and that's ostensibly a "sale" price, with the current MSRP being $1,919.
PNY RTX 4080 Super Verto OC: now $989 at Walmart
The least expensive RTX 4080 Super right now, PNY's Verto OC is a thick 3-slot card without the bling. It's $10 less than other cards with the same GPU, which will all offer very similar performance based on past testing.
All indications are that Nvidia will launch both the RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 in January 2025. CEO Jensen Huang will be giving the CES 2025 Keynote, and while AI has become a huge part of CES these days, we also think the Nvidia Blackwell RTX 50-series will have plenty to offer for AI users. It's not the usual way Nvidia has done GPU launches in the past, but then these are unusual times for the company. Riding the AI boom, its market cap currently sits at around $3.25 trillion, nearly triple what it was at the start of 2024 — and about nine times where it sat at the start of 2023. If being at the forefront of AI has allowed Nvidia to accomplish that, why not announce the latest generation of consumer GPUs at CES 2025?
There are also plenty of indications that, despite ostensibly being "gaming" GPUs, vast numbers of RTX 4090 — and even lower tier Ada Lovelace RTX 40-series GPUs — have been put to work running AI workloads. It's an echo of the cryptocurrency mining boom, only without quite the same level of scalping and backdoor dealing. Nvidia wasn't particularly keen on GPU mining back in the day, going so far as to implement Ethereum mining limiters (that, yes, were eventually broken).
But running AI on Nvidia GPUs has been a major topic since the RTX branding was first revealed in 2018. If you're an individual or business running AI on a bunch of GeForce cards? That's perfectly acceptable behavior, as far as Nvidia is concerned.
The result is that, for better or worse, GPU prices aren't coming down, especially not at the top of Nvidia's product stack. You can see the two best "deals" we're tracking right now on the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080 Super above; the latter is selling at MSRP and the former starts at $200 above MSRP. (Inflation over the past two years could be a potential factor as well, of course.)
And my bet is that generational pricing will increase for the RTX 5090 and 5080 — possibly a lot. $1,999 for a 5090 and $1,199 for the 5080 is probably the best we can hope for. $2,499 and $1,299 launch prices frankly wouldn't surprise me.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.
-
nitrium If the 5090's won't be readily available before mid-late January (after the rumoured CES launch on Jan 5th), then nVidia have done this way too early. Missing the entire holiday market for a start - that's leaving a lot of money on the table.Reply -
aberkae Great opportunity for AMD to maintain market share by default available supply for 1 whole quarter during holiday season ( with prices in a freefall for rdna 3.)Reply -
watzupken
They know it won't make any impact, hence, they are doing it. The problem is, the prices of GPUs have been severely manipulated over the last few years to artificially bump or maintain prices. You may recall reading supply deliberately being reduced to limit the flow so that it won't impact prices. In this case, Nvidia knows for sure that cutting supply this early means there will be a price increase, but you can tell they don't care. And I am pretty sure Blackwell cards will be more expensive based on the trend that any increase in performance will also result in a pretty proportionate increase in price.nitrium said:If the 5090's won't be readily available before mid-late January (after the rumoured CES launch on Jan 5th), then nVidia have done this way too early. Missing the entire holiday market for a start - that's leaving a lot of money on the table. -
watzupken
I feel it is an uphill battle for AMD to increase market share. Even for a couple of months, I don't think they will sell enough to move the needle meaningfully. The problem is that most people are grounded in their idea that Nvidia's hardware is always better. It doesn't matter if rasterization is almost the same because AMD falls behind in the "other features" like DLSS and RT. You can tell this is a very prevalent issue. So Nvidia can charge whatever they want because they have successfully established their "advantages" in most people's mindset.aberkae said:Great opportunity for AMD to maintain market share by default available supply for 1 whole quarter during holiday season ( with prices in a freefall for rdna 3.) -
aberkae
True hence the word maintain not gain.watzupken said:I feel it is an uphill battle for AMD to increase market share. Even for a couple of months, I don't think they will sell enough to move the needle meaningfully. The problem is that most people are grounded in their idea that Nvidia's hardware is always better. It doesn't matter if rasterization is almost the same because AMD falls behind in the "other features" like DLSS and RT. You can tell this is a very prevalent issue. So Nvidia can charge whatever they want because they have successfully established their "advantages" in most people's mindset. -
Kondamin
Those other things include drivers and power use.watzupken said:I feel it is an uphill battle for AMD to increase market share. Even for a couple of months, I don't think they will sell enough to move the needle meaningfully. The problem is that most people are grounded in their idea that Nvidia's hardware is always better. It doesn't matter if rasterization is almost the same because AMD falls behind in the "other features" like DLSS and RT. You can tell this is a very prevalent issue. So Nvidia can charge whatever they want because they have successfully established their "advantages" in most people's mindset.
Those aren’t minor things
10 years ago they couldn’t compete with nvidia because of the financial situation of the company now they are refusing to even try -
valthuer I live in Greece and, given the absurd prices in our market right now, anyone looking to buy a 4090, will have difficulty paying less than 2.200€.Reply
I wouldn't be surprised to see 5090 costing as much as 3.000-3.500€.
I don't know if i'll be able to raise enough cash until January 2025, but, if by some miracle i pull it off, i would very much like to buy 5090. -
Maebius How about these guys pleasantly surprise us for a change?*Reply
We'll never forget they're scum, even though we "must" buy their products....
Right now, there are only bad scenarios.
-Hey, 2.5K$, enjoy
-2K$, be thankful it's not 2.5
*like same MSRP as previous gen and adequate availability to get them at that price -
hannibal 4090 at $1790 makes 5080 at $1500 to look reasonable good deal. And if 5090 is $2500 as it has been predicted. That also makes 5080 look reasonable good option...Reply
Latest leaks shows that 5070 12gb is about $700 so, there is room for older GPUs to remain in the market without any meaningful price drops! = profit!
But all in all Nvidia knows that by keeping supply low, they can maintain big margins. Also they know based on 4000 series that AMD and Intel can not get any meaningful market share, no matter how much Nvidia gpus cost and how little they put vram on them.
I just can not wait the 5000 series super versions to come to the market with 3Gb memory chips. Nvidia can increase prices 30% and those will fly out of selves, because they finally have "enough" memory, so that AMD or Intel offering are useless to biggest part of the customers.
I should buy more Nvidia stocks while I can... -
EzzyB
I don't know about "manipulated." Right now these are resources, commodities if you will. You are a company-for-profit and those commodities are more valuable to your bottom line as commercial products for the AI industry.watzupken said:They know it won't make any impact, hence, they are doing it. The problem is, the prices of GPUs have been severely manipulated over the last few years to artificially bump or maintain prices. You may recall reading supply deliberately being reduced to limit the flow so that it won't impact prices. In this case, Nvidia knows for sure that cutting supply this early means there will be a price increase, but you can tell they don't care. And I am pretty sure Blackwell cards will be more expensive based on the trend that any increase in performance will also result in a pretty proportionate increase in price.
AMD, at least for now, has simply given up the market for high-end gaming GPU's. Almost certainly because what they can manufacture makes more profit as an AI product. Nvidia only seems to care the the 4090 exists at the top of the Tom's Hardware gaming GPU list. Even at MSRP it could more profitably use those resources in commercial AI chips so why churn out more?
AI training has simply made it more profitable for them to make AI chips instead of gaming GPU's, especially at the cutting edge.