Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64 Gaming OC 8G Review
Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Conclusion
The same conclusions we reached in our Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 56 Gaming OC 8G Review mostly apply here, too. This is another bread-and-butter board that exposes the best sides of Radeon RX Vega 64 without piling on features, gimmicks, and cost. It keeps Gigabyte in its financial comfort zone, rather than sucking up resources. And that seems to have been a good decision, given the availability of Vega-based packages. It's not always necessary to go overboard with extras to attract attention; sometimes a bit of common sense resonates more with enthusiasts.
If we consider the Radeon RX Vega 64 Gaming OC 8G to be one of these no-frills models, then, Gigabyte actually does a number of things really well. This card wasn't meant to be a flagship. For its light weight, dimensions, and cooler technology, it's pleasantly quiet, even if it does suffer from a hot PCB caused by Gigabyte's layout choices. These heat levels are not enough to significantly harm the card, but the temperatures are still unnecessarily warm. Fortunately, a recent firmware update does help, and we're hoping that's made available to everyone soon.
The heat pipe direct touch cooler gets a special mention, too. Although it's typically used to minimize production costs, replacing a proper copper sink or vapor chamber, in an entry-level model like this one, the design works well and deserves praise. The slight difference in performance compared to Sapphire's Radeon RX Vega 64 Nitro+ is proof enough that building a less expensive product doesn't have to mean handicapping its abilities.
Frequencies and power consumption land exactly where we expected, elevating this card's gaming performance to an acceptable level. Brute-force overclocking doesn't make much sense unless you're willing to crank up the fan speeds and live with lots of noise. The better alternative is spending some time finding optimal settings for a stable undervolted configuration, even if a future driver or operating system update forces you to start over. Unfortunately, WattMan on its own is hardly sufficient for hardcore tweaking the way it works currently.
If only AMD wasn't having such severe issues with supplying Vega 10 GPU/HBM2 packages, Gigabyte's Radeon RX Vega 64 Gaming OC 8G would enjoy ample availability and a reasonable price tag. Instead, the card is entirely unavailable in the U.S., and when Vega 64 boards do appear, they're marked up beyond what anyone should pay for one. The accountants at Gigabyte made sure that this obviously low-volume series doesn't cost more to make than it's worth in sales. You might even call that damage control.
Should supply see an unexpected surge in the future, Gigabyte can take its custom PCB and, with a few minor production changes, turn the Radeon RX Vega 64 Gaming OC 8G into the Aorus-branded board it was designed to be.
MORE: Best Graphics Cards
MORE: Desktop GPU Performance Hierarchy Table
MORE: All Graphics Content
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
-
g-unit1111 I really wish we could buy these. I'd love to get a Vega 56. This GPU shortage is getting absolutely stupid.Reply -
FormatC I personally hate this stupid mining. A waste of ressources, only to feed a big bubble.Reply
And to look forward:
No VGA available means no sales of CPU, mainboards, memory etc.
The kiddies will buy consoles... Totally bad for the PC market and periphery.
-
barryv88 Again, Toms is very tight lipped about these Vega cards consistently outperforming their competitors. Hardly anything mentioned about those gaming benchmarks and the fact that the V64 eats the 1080 especially at 2560 res. AND you get a great mining card. And a $200 cheaper monitor (instead of a Gsync comparable one) thanx to Freesync. I'm counting quite alot of wins here. If only the miners didn't spoil the party!Reply -
FormatC
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-graphics-cards,4725.html20634804 said:Good power analysis. I wish there were comparisons against the 1080 though.
I made such a thing long time ago. Simply pick a card of your choice and compare it. The 1080 is in a few months old iron ;)
No hash rate benchmarks? Disappointed:(
It is a gaming card, not just another card to feed the mining bubble. The current market situation is the result of all this mining shit. Greed eats brain - not with me. Please don't ask me, how I got these both samples. You see any other reviews of this GB cards? :)
Hardly anything mentioned about those gaming benchmarks
Of course, I could have added a performance/watt curve as well. It has all some pros and cons. Sometimes it's just better to keep quiet. Everyone can read, what he prefer. :)
-
pepar0 Personally, I think the tech/gaming media should STOP reviewing graphics cards that cannot be purchased. Nor couldn't be afforded if they could be found. This is not out of wanting to punish the GPU makers, but is rather a practical and principals matter. Plus it might cause GPU makes to rethink their positions; gamers will be here if digital currencies evolve to where mining is not needed.Reply -
g-unit1111 20634712 said:Again, Toms is very tight lipped about these Vega cards consistently outperforming their competitors. Hardly anything mentioned about those gaming benchmarks and the fact that the V64 eats the 1080 especially at 2560 res. AND you get a great mining card. And a $200 cheaper monitor (instead of a Gsync comparable one) thanx to Freesync. I'm counting quite alot of wins here. If only the miners didn't spoil the party!
I'd *LOVE* to buy a Vega 56 or Vega 64 especially to compare with my 1080, and the Vega platform is pretty solid. The GPU makers really need to start taking steps to end this madness. The GPU shortage is getting to be ridiculously stupid on every level.