Kingston KC2500 M.2 NVMe SSD Review: Mature Flash Makes for Great Performance

Kingston’s KC2500 is a capable Self-Encrypting Drive (SED) built for high performance.

Kingston KC2500
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

With secure XTS-AES 256-bit SED capability and one of the most responsive SSD hardware combos on the market, Kingston’s KC2500 is a fantastic SSD for prosumer use. It's just a bit too costly when similar drives are selling for much less.

Pros

  • +

    Solid performance

  • +

    Software package support

  • +

    XTS-AES 256-bit hardware encryption

  • +

    Black PCB

  • +

    Five-year warranty

Cons

  • -

    Expensive

  • -

    Not as efficient at copying as competing solutions

  • -

    Sticker detracts from aesthetics

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Kingston new KC2500 leverages the same components as its predecessor, the KC2000 from 2019.But this time around the firmware has things cranked up a notch. With Silicon Motion’s SM2262EN and Kioxia’s latest BiCS4 96L TLC NAND flash, it can hit read/write speeds upwards of 3.5/2.9 GBps. And with XTS-AES 256-bit hardware-based encryption on top, it’s an ideal business-class storage device for your laptop when on the go, or for a high-performance workstation at the office. Its only fault is its high price when purchased in low volume. 

Kingston’s KC2000 was a rather good performer when it went through our benchmarks the last go-round, although, it wasn’t one of the best SSDs. The reasoning? While Kingston was using a pretty potent component combo, there were some limitations to its design. Mainly, the NAND’s operation speeds were set to slower frequencies than what competitors were operating at, and the fact that the Kioxia NAND was of a 2-plane design, rather than 4-plane like Micron’s and Samsung’s, potentially losing out on some performance under mixed workloads. 

Sean Webster
Storage Reviewer

Sean is a Contributing Editor at Tom’s Hardware US, covering storage hardware.

  • g-unit1111
    Is it really worth the extra $100 for a 1/2 second of less load time than the comparable WD Black or Sabrent Rocket drives?
    Reply
  • mdd1963
    "..even exceeding the cost of the 970 EVO Plus"

    Pretty much done reading at this point...
    :)
    Reply