Nvidia's new trimmed-down entry-level gaming GPU fails to outperform rivals — RTX 3050 6GB lags behind five-year-old GTX 1660 Ti
Fast for a 75W card, but not so fast compared to other entry-level GPUs
TechPowerUp reviewed Nvidia's new entry-level GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and found its performance to be good and bad, depending on how you view it. The review outlet found that the RTX 3050 6GB is the fastest GPU on the market and does not require a dedicated supplementary power connector. Still, compared to other GPUs, the RTX 3050 6GB was a whopping 20-30% slower than its 8GB counterpart and slower than Nvidia's five-year-old GTX 1660 Ti based on the Turing architecture.
Despite what its name suggests, the RTX 3050 6GB comes with more cut hardware specifications than just its memory capacity. Clock speed, power draw, memory bus width, and memory capacity have all been neutered, making this card more of an "RTX 3040" than an offshoot of the RTX 3050 8GB.
Compared to the RTX 3050 8GB, the RTX 3050 6GB comes with 11% fewer CUDA cores and SMs, a 21% lower boost clock, 33% less memory bandwidth and memory capacity, and an 85% lower TDP.
The RTX 3050 6GB's heavily neutered specifications explain why it is much slower than its 8GB counterpart. TechPowerUp's benchmarks reveal that the RTX 3050 8GB is 28% faster than the RTX 3050 6GB on average at 1080P. At 1440P, the 8GB card is 30% quicker on average, and at 4K, the 8GB card extends its performance lead by 40%. Even more embarrassing, the RTX 3050 6GB was outpaced by Nvidia's GTX 1660 Ti 6GB in all three resolutions, according to TechPowerUp's testing. At 1080P, the 1660 Ti was 18% quicker than the 3050 6GB on average, 20% quicker at 1440P, and 15% faster at 4k.
Header Cell - Column 0 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
---|---|---|
SMs | 18 | 20 |
CUDA Cores | 2,304 | 2,560 |
Base Clock | 1,042 MHz | 1,552 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1,470 MHz | 1,777 MHz |
VRAM | 6GB | 8GB |
VRAM Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit |
VRAM Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
TDP | 70W | 130W |
Required PSU Wattage | 300W or greater | 550W or greater |
Price | $179 | From $220 |
The only cards Nvidia's 3050 6GB could beat on TechPowerUp's list were Nvidia's ancient GTX 1060 6GB, AMD's RX 580 8GB, and RX 6500 XT 4GB. It is worth mentioning that the GTX 1650/1650 Super and GTX 1660/1660 Super were not on this chart. But based on TechPowerUp's results, the 6GB Ampere GPU would probably be close to the GTX 1650 Super in terms of performance, sadly.
Unsurprisingly, in-game performance was also lackluster. TechPowerUp found that the RTX 3050 6GB could not achieve 60FPS at 1080P in most games. In many of the latest AAA titles, such as A Plague Tale Requiem, Jedi: Survivor, Alan Wake 2, and older ones, such as Cyberpunk 2077, the Ampere GPU could barely achieve playable FPS (30 FPS) at 1080P. Granted, in-game settings could probably be brought down to achieve higher FPS, but these results are not fantastic for a brand-new GPU launched in 2024.
The only area in which the RTX 3050 6GB was competitive was TechPowerUp's efficiency results. The review outlet found that the 3050 6GB was on par with Nvidia's Ada Lovelace GPU architecture in terms of efficiency and was just 3% worse than the RTX 4060. The Ampere GPU was also 32% more efficient than the RTX 3050 8GB. This makes a lot of sense, considering the RTX 3050 6GB is clocked significantly lower than the 8GB variant, which means the GPU is probably operating in a more efficient part of its voltage curve.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Nonetheless, TechPowerUp's review confirms that the RTX 3050 6GB's performance is terrible, and for $180, it is probably one of the worst GPUs you can buy in the entry-level market. AMD's RX 6600 costs $20-$30 more than the 3050 6GB and is 60% faster, according to TechPowerUp's benchmarks. The same goes for Intel's Arc A750.
The only saving grace the RTX 3050 6GB has is its 75W power envelope, enabling it to work in systems that don't have a dedicated supplementary PCIe power cable. For these systems, you have no choice but to go with a 75W GPU like the 3050 6GB.
Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.
-
Neilbob
Coming in a few weeks at a price of 299 I expect...samopa said:Why 3050 ? What's happen with 4050 ? -
Sleepy_Hollowed Wowza.Reply
My RX580 is almost as good and perhaps better on games with demanding VRAM?!?!
Talk about nope. -
stonecarver Is this not the same marketing move Nvidia did when the RTX 2000's hit the stores. They went from the 1080's to the 2070/ 2080's and filled in the nitch gap with the GTX 1660'sReply
Back than the 1660 was the new 1070 but less powerful.
So is the 3050 6Gb the new 1660 and again less powerful. -
King_V
True, definitely a much better performance bang-per-buck.AgentBirdnest said:Arc A580 - 68% faster for $10-15 less money.
But 164% greater power consumption to get that 68% better performance. -
Joseph_138
Arc A580 also requires two 8-pin power connectors. The whole purpose of the 6gb 3050 is to put in systems that may not have any supplemental power connectors, like low end prebuilts, that may only come with a 300W PSU.AgentBirdnest said:Arc A580 - 68% faster for $10-15 less money. -
Joseph_138 1660 Ti is not a fair comparison for this card, as that was the top the range GTX 16 card, and also requires supplental power. You should be comparing it to the vanilla 1650.Reply -
Joseph_138 stonecarver said:Is this not the same marketing move Nvidia did when the RTX 2000's hit the stores. They went from the 1080's to the 2070/ 2080's and filled in the nitch gap with the GTX 1660's
Back than the 1660 was the new 1070 but less powerful.
So is the 3050 6Gb the new 1660 and again less powerful.
No, it's the new 1650, only more powerful. -
bit_user TechPowerUp reviewed Nvidia's new entry-level GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and found its performance to be good and bad, depending on how you view it.
Wow... so Toms is reduced to reporting on other site's reviews? C'mon, guys!