ASRock AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Is Seriously Cheap at $360

ASRock Radeon RX 5700 XT: Now $360, was $410

ASRock Radeon RX 5700 XT: Now $360, was $410
A factory overclocked AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT for under $360? Where do we sign up? For slick 1440p gaming, you'll struggle to outpace this ASRock board at anywhere near this price point.

 

  • Dark Lord of Tech
    I wish they had decent drivers ,I would go for this deal.
    Reply
  • King_V
    I'm given to understand that, like their Polaris cards, AsRock's coolers are not all that great, thus resulting in a lot of fan noise.
    Reply
  • hannibal
    The driver issue is something that plagues some users and others have none.
    I have not have any issues, but my install was completely new without old drivers causing havok. Most people who has had problems Are those with two monitors and upgrading from older gpu.
    it seems that amd driver or installation program really don`t like older drivers. That is bad, but can be remedied in most cases with clean install.
    Reply
  • Dark Lord of Tech
    I have had issue with 3 of their cards , 1 is mine , getting a refund and 2 from builds for others , all being returned.
    Reply
  • Clinton_4
    admin said:
    ASRock AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is seriously cheap at $359.99

    ASRock AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is Seriously Cheap at $360 : Read more
    Are thermals gonna be ok on this card? It's hard to get info on this specific build
    Reply
  • ocer9999
    Clinton_4 said:
    Are thermals gonna be ok on this card? It's hard to get info on this specific build

    The Asrock 5700XT , it's not a triple fan but looks like it does the job of keeping it cool, I even think it's better than the Asus fiasco with 5700XT strix, they had their cooler screws badly done so the GPU would go up to 78c and with high fan speed.

    So yes, for 100$ less you get probably equality if not better temperatures. ;)
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    Seriously cheap? $360 is still kind of expensive and puts it way behind leaders on the performance-per-dollar curve at ~50% higher cost per FPS, which makes it still considerably overpriced in my book.
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    InvalidError said:
    Seriously cheap? $360 is still kind of expensive and puts it way behind leaders on the performance-per-dollar curve at ~50% higher cost per FPS, which makes it still considerably overpriced in my book.


    It is the cheapest 5700xt, that you can buy.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    logainofhades said:
    It is the cheapest 5700xt, that you can buy.
    The MSI Evoke can be had for the same price too and there are at least four more models within $20. That would be marginally (3-6%) cheaper, not seriously cheap.
    Reply