Join for quick access. Enter your email below and we'll send confirmation plus sign you up to our newsletter.
By submitting your information, you confirm you are aged 16 or over,
have read our
Privacy Policy
and agree to the
Terms & Conditions. Geographical rules apply.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Few colors were perfect, even though almost all were considered good by the calibrator. The colors were less showy than on the FP91V+, but at least they were natural. The FP91V's picture was somewhat dull.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Black spot
White spot
Contrast
0.37
225
608 : 1
The results were fairly good. The brightness was a little high, but you have to compare it to the 300 nits of the two preceding monitors. The black level was quite decent.
The optimum contrast was at approximately 80% brightness, as with the FP91V+. For our calibration, we set it at 76% brightness. That had the best fidelity results.
The color gamut was only slightly broader compared to the FP91V+.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.