AT&T to Spend $14 Billion to Upgrade Wireless Networks

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Zak Islam
Contributor

Zak Islam is a freelance writer focusing on security, networking, and general computing. His work also appears at Digital Trends and Tom's Guide. 

  • RADIO_ACTIVE
    About time, they have been raping people right and left for a while...
    Reply
  • 100 megabits per second with a 20GB monthly cap...
    Reply
  • kyuuketsuki
    AT&T to Spend $14 Billion to Upgrade Wireless Networks
    Project Velocity IP, otherwise known as VIP, will receive an investment of $14 billion over the next three years. $8 billion will be focused towards its wireless division and a further $6 billion for wireline.
    So, the headline is wrong. "Only" 8 billion is going toward the wireless network. 14 billion is the combined total for the investments into wireless and wireline.
    traans100 megabits per second with a 20GB monthly cap...Current monthly cap on U-verse is 250GB. Not that I'm defending having a cap, but if you're going to complain at least get your facts straight.
    Reply
  • bak0n
    And. I'm leaving them when my contract expires anyways so don't care.
    Reply
  • spartanmk2
    Does this mean the cell tower near my house will get camoulfage?
    Reply
  • Thunderfox
    With bandwidth caps and crackdown on file sharing, all this bandwidth will mostly benefit Netflix and Hulu and places like that.
    Reply
  • noob2222
    I wonder who gets to pay for this upgrade?

    hidden fine print : current AT&T customers will see a 50% increase in their bill over the next 5 years.
    Reply
  • spentshells
    noob2222I wonder who gets to pay for this upgrade? hidden fine print : current AT&T customers will see a 50% increase in their bill over the next 5 years.
    Dude it's already paid for by every person who went 1GB over in the last few years trust me this was a cash deal
    Reply
  • frank_drebin
    will i get get 4 bars at home, then?
    Reply
  • nebun
    where do they get this kind of money???
    Reply