Skip to main content

FCC Says No to Obama's DTV Transition

Obama's transition team wants to push back the date when analog broadcasters switch over to digital, however FCC's chairman rejects the idea.

During CES '09, Federal Communications Commissions chairman and Republican Kevin Martin said that a delay in the upcoming analog-to-digital transition taking place next month might actually cause more confusion, that there are other options to pursue rather than push the transition date back. As reported by The Associate Press, last Thursday, President-elect Barack Obama's transition team requested that Congress not switch off the analog signals just yet, citing that the program ran out of money and currently could not fill the requests of consumers seeking converter box vouchers, thus the need to delay the change.

Martin said Saturday that Congress could pass additional funding, or eliminate the 90-day expiration deadline on the coupons altogether. Over the past few months, broadcasters have heavily advertised the February 17 transition, and many have even scheduled the engineering work to take down the analog antennas and make way for digital coverage.

However, turmoil seems to boil within the FCC, as Democratic FCC commissioner Jonathan Adelstein voiced his understanding of the delay at a CES panel discussion. "This program has been badly mismanaged. It's not ready for prime time," he said. "There are so many elements of the preparation that have not been undertaken ... We don't have program in place in the field to help people who need assistance in their homes. The phone banks are inadequately prepared."

Last week the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) put a "waiting list" into effect after the $1.34 billion in funding quickly depleted. 103,000 requests were immediately added to the list, and those currently on the list will only receive a voucher if one goes unclaimed and expires. The NTIA urged consumers to go out and purchase a converter box for at least one television set, and not wait for a voucher. The NTIA claims that more than 24 million households requested over 46 million coupons.

With constant advertising and online media coverage, consumers facing the turmoil of upgrading current connections to digital may or may not find the postponement confusing. Time is running out, as February 15 looms in the distance and millions of over-the-air viewers may eventually be left in the dark if something isn't done soon. A delay seems appropriate, if not necessary, despite the FCC chairman's reservations.

"I'm concerned about a delay in the sense that if you can solve that issue other ways, a delay has actually the potential to confuse consumers," said Martin. "All of our messaging has been about Feb. 17 — not just ours — the industry's."

  • eklipz330
    mind my ignorance, but whats the point of moving from analog to digital? is it to free some air traffic or something? or is there more to it?
    Reply
  • Siffy
    http://dtvfacts.com/ should help. Basically UHF and VHF channels that you can pick up with "rabbit ears" are going away. And yes, it's to free up air space. The TV channels are taking up frequency channels, and you can fit more information in a digital channel than an analog channel I believe. They may even be able to place those channels closer together in the spectrum allocated. The benefit to everyone: more useless garbage on TV to wade through when trying to find what you want.
    Reply
  • Tekkamanraiden
    Basically they are intending to sell off the analog broadcast spectrum currently allocated to television.
    Reply
  • tbq
    I doubt the government bought these people the TVs they already own. I don't see why they need to buy them the converter box as well. It's been known for quite a while that the transition was going to take place; if some people are without a functional TV for a while it'll probably be a net gain for society. TV is not a right, and most people probably have better things to do with their time than watching network TV anyway.
    Reply
  • DFGum
    tbqI doubt the government bought these people the TVs they already own. I don't see why they need to buy them the converter box as well. It's been known for quite a while that the transition was going to take place; if some people are without a functional TV for a while it'll probably be a net gain for society. TV is not a right, and most people probably have better things to do with their time than watching network TV anyway.By your logic if they stopped producing electricity in 1 years, that makes it ok, even though you JUST bought your electric appliance.
    Reply
  • fuser
    Ditch the rabbit ears and get a real television. Or just ditch television completely.
    Reply
  • ceteras
    DFGumBy your logic if they stopped producing electricity in 1 years, that makes it ok, even though you JUST bought your electric appliance.
    There is no logic in your comparison.
    Electricity is vital, TV programs have a bad effect on you, stop watching!
    Reply
  • curnel_D
    The government needs to quit trying to hold everyone's hand through this. If someone is so out of it in terms of even just this news, it's clear they wont be watching TV in the first place. Just change it for the better, and quit babying the american consumer.
    Reply
  • I think it's a bad time for many to switch over.
    Many houses in foreclosure,and jobs on the line, make the television really the last investment on many people's mind.

    Though there are few still viewing TV via antenna, (most cable or satellite) for those who do obviously do it for a financial reason (since the reception of tv signals via antenna doesn't cost the user anything save the TV that receives the signal,and a copper wire.

    And,yes, imagine another 100 million houses or so, all of a sudden having a 5-15W device in their home,plugged in 24/7.

    that'd be close to 500million watts hour of added pollution.
    Reply
  • Correction on my post above, not all will need a digital converter; I believe satellite already is digital, and cable too.
    I roughly estimate 15% of the population still having antenna, so that'd be more like 750.000Watt hour on added electricity.
    That's something!
    Reply