Apple May Be Digging AMD's Fusion APU

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • rpgplayer
    AMD should have been catering to software companies long ago about their stream API. a fusion processor isn't as attractive unless you have the software to support it.

    not to demean the APU in the least, it's just they are way behind when it comes to software support.
    Reply
  • jonpaul37
    Even though i HATE Apple, i like this move, it paves the way a little bit more for AMD...
    Reply
  • victorintelr
    Of course it's right, now Apple computer will go from overpriced to:
    Super-overpriced!
    Reply
  • jomofro39
    Apple will put it in their workstations... $3400!!
    Reply
  • User69
    Please don't taint AMD's success with an Apple rumor, your article is shedding a bad light on the manufacturer.
    Reply
  • miloo
    eventhou now i dont own a AMD laptop or desktop
    but this APU looks promising, might try one in the future
    future laptop will be more smaller i guess ~

    Reply
  • Albyint
    I wonder if Apple would have the audacity to overcharge on AMD hardware.......
    Reply
  • hellwig
    AMD is the only future for Apple right now. Intel has forced Apple's hand with its "I'm taking my ball and going home" lawsuit against Nvidia about Nvidia's chipset manufacturing license (i.e. Nvidia cannot make chipsets for Intel's latest processors). The reason is simple, graphics. Yes, Intel SandyBridge is including GPU-capabilities on-die, but that's not enough for mainstream and enthusiast users. Apple still needs a discrete-option, and right now, only AMD offers Chipsets + Discrete GPU solutions. Nvidia can provide GPUs, but they can't provide motherboards and chipsets for Intel. Intel can provide chipsets, but they have no discrete option.

    Apple doesn't want to go to multiple vendors (that defeats the whole "it just works" philosophy). They want a single provider. AMD can offer a CPU Chipset+GPU solution at every level (on-die with Fusion to discrete with Radeon). It just makes sense with Apple's business strategy.

    Still, knowing Apple, it will be overpriced.
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    I can only see Fusion for the Mac Books. For their work station PCs, I don't see them moving away from a high end quad core and discrete workstation grade GPU.
    Reply
  • saturnus
    jimmysmittyI can only see Fusion for the Mac Books. For their work station PCs, I don't see them moving away from a high end quad core and discrete workstation grade GPU.
    But that high end quad core could very well be a bulldozer design combined with a radeon gpu when it's time for the next upgrade of the mac line in about 6-7 months time.
    Reply