AMD makes FSR 4 upscaling official for Radeon RX 7000- and 6000-series cards — RDNA 3 and RDNA 2 chips will soon enjoy improved visuals

News
By
Published

Welcome news for owners of older hardware, especially in the current GPU landscape

Radeon GPU
(Image credit: AMD)

Owners of Radeon RX 9000-series cards have been enjoying the benefits of the company's FSR 4 upscaling tech for some time now, and that feature has officially been exclusive to those products since launch. Gamers with older Radeons were left out in the cold, sparking community outrage—until today. AMD VP Jack Huynh has revealed that FSR 4.1 upscaling will be made available for RDNA 3 cards (RX 7000-series products) in July, and for RDNA 2 cards (RX 6000-series products) in "early 2027."

Community testing of AMD's INT8 FSR 4 code puts the penalty at around 10-20% versus FSR 3 on 6000-series cards, and a lower cost on 7000-series Radeons, but only testing with the full official version will tell the full story. Having said that, even with lower performance scaling, the quality-to-speed ratio of FSR 4.1 is almost certainly worth it.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Bruno Ferreira
Bruno Ferreira
Contributor

Bruno Ferreira is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has decades of experience with PC hardware and assorted sundries, alongside a career as a developer. He's obsessed with detail and has a tendency to ramble on the topics he loves. When not doing that, he's usually playing games, or at live music shows and festivals.

34 Comments Comment from the forums
  • -Fran-
    Finally AMD. Finally...

    Took you long enough, but this is still a W.

    Also, this means Steam Deck gets FSR4.1 officially. Neat.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    I bet Valve's voice in the background helped push this forward. 🤔

    Still, a late win, yes but a win. That early code leak probably also made this sort of inevitable.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    While the immediacy of RDNA 3 getting it is probably driven by the integrated proliferation (and lack of RDNA 4 here) I'm glad they're moving just the same. The wait for RDNA 2 seems pretty dumb, but at least they've officially committed to it.
    Reply
  • ManDaddio
    Well it's about time. But that means the Radeon used market prices are going way up now.
    Steam box might use fsr4 now?
    Reply
  • DS426
    ManDaddio said:
    Well it's about time. But that means the Radeon used market prices are going way up now.
    Steam box might use fsr4 now?
    I don't know that it'll have that effect, lol.
    Yes, we're assuming that Steam Deck ("early 2027") and Steam Machine will get FSR4 support now.
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    Nice! As a 7900XTX user I’m quite pleased with this even though I’m not playing any games where I can’t get 60fps@4K yet (the most my primary screen can do).

    Good to know this’ll be available when I get round to playing games that need it for a decent experience.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    As a 9070XT owner I think this is great. Wider install base means more dev participation.

    But 2 corrections: 1. FSR4.1 has more shimmering than FSR 4.0, probably revealed by the increased sharpness and clarity, and 2. The performance hit on RDNA 3,2 relative to RDNA4 will be noticeable as the 9060XT has more significantly more 8 bit than the 7900XTX , much less the 6900XT.

    It should still be completely worth it for iGPUs though as AMD has fallen pretty far behind Intel in the iGPU upscaling category and this helps them catch up. It would be interesting to see a comparison of these iGPUs with upscaling enabled now that AMD iGPUs are getting something comparable to XeSS.
    Reply
  • usertests
    ManDaddio said:
    Well it's about time. But that means the Radeon used market prices are going way up now.
    Steam box might use fsr4 now?
    Is FSR4 support in enough games to justify prices going way up?

    Yes, the Steam Machine should have it. Possibly at launch if it comes out in July or later, or updated to have it very soon after launch.

    rluker5 said:
    The performance hit on RDNA 3,2 relative to RDNA4 will be noticeable as the 9060XT has more significantly more 8 bit than the 7900XTX , much less the 6900XT.
    People have already been testing FSR4 on RDNA 2/3 for months. I think the performance hit was less than expected given the major TOPS advantage RDNA4 cards have. But gamers may have to use a lower FSR4 quality level, or accept losing some FPS in exchange for better quality.
    Reply
  • mitch074
    usertests said:
    Is FSR4 support in enough games to justify prices going way up?

    Yes, the Steam Machine should have it. Possibly at launch if it comes out in July or later, or updated to have it very soon after launch.


    People have already been testing FSR4 on RDNA 2/3 for months. I think the performance hit was less than expected given the major TOPS advantage RDNA4 cards have. But gamers may have to use a lower FSR4 quality level, or accept losing some FPS in exchange for better quality.
    The main problem with RDNA2's implementation wasn't speed but quality, because while RDNA3 could use INT8 in the matrix computations that RDNA4 does in FP8 for FSR4 (which can be done with little to no rounding errors), RDNA2 can't do wave matrix multiply accumulate (WMMA) at all and must rely on this being emulated on top - resulting in far more rounding errors and thus much lower quality and a much higher compute cost.
    Reply
  • usertests
    mitch074 said:
    The main problem with RDNA2's implementation wasn't speed but quality, because while RDNA3 could use INT8 in the matrix computations that RDNA4 does in FP8 for FSR4 (which can be done with little to no rounding errors), RDNA2 can't do wave matrix multiply accumulate (WMMA) at all and must rely on this being emulated on top - resulting in far more rounding errors and thus much lower quality and a much higher compute cost.
    Didn't hear about that but OK.

    If AMD is giving themselves that much more time, maybe what they'll come up with will be better than the leaked version.
    Reply