Microsoft Skeptical of Firefox's 1 Billion Downloads

Next news
10:21 AM - August 14, 2009 by Jane McEntegart

It seems Microsoft isn't exactly bowled over by Mozilla's claim of one billion Firefox downloads.

Most of you were pretty pleased to hear that Mozilla had reached one billion downloads. Given that a lot of you use the browser, you were happy to hear you played a small role in something so huge for the company. However, it seems Microsoft isn't exactly convinced of Mozilla's achievement. According to The Guardian, Amy Barzdukas, a general manager at Microsoft in charge of the company's Internet Explorer browser, said that Mozilla's recent milestone announcement made for "interesting math."

"It's an interesting number and I have not seen the math [but] how many internet connected users are there? 1.1 billion, 1.5 billion, something in that area," Barzdukas said.

Mozilla's one billion figure includes every update and all downloads since Firefox's 2004 launch. Do you think Mozilla is correct in its claim? Let us know in the comments below!

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
chuckdalton 08/14/2009 4:41 PM
Hide
-20+

If Microsoft were to post the quantity of downloads they would probably include updates and all, so yes, mozilla is corect to include everything.

brendano257 08/14/2009 4:42 PM
Hide
-20+

I think Microsoft is being a whinny little kid ^_^

leo2kp 08/14/2009 4:44 PM
Hide
-20+

I think it's possible to have a billion downloads when you consider every single update, and some people download multiple times for whatever reason.

dingumf 08/14/2009 4:47 PM
Hide
-20+

I've downloaded Mozilla several times for clean installs...

warezme 08/14/2009 4:47 PM
Hide
-7+

I don't think Firefox would even need to include updates to get that number. I personally have installed it on my home computer (1), my laptop with 3 separate OS's on two drives (3), and on my workstation at work (1), as well as doing updates on all of them and including it as part of an image for no less than 150 staff workstations and 25 checkout laptops.

So I personally have installed it at least 5 times and 175 times by association. That does not count updates.

Burodsx 08/14/2009 4:49 PM
Hide
-5+

Considering all the updates as of late... yes I fully agree with this number. Either way, I've always been a Firefox fan. Microsoft on the other hand... well... save that one for another topic.

mtyermom 08/14/2009 4:49 PM
Hide
-16+

Lol, MS talking fuzzy numbers.... do I believe Firefox has been downloaded 1 billion times? Absolutely. We're not talking unique, individual users/computers here. I'm just one person and I've probably downloaded Firefox hundreds of times (counting updates, etc).

griffed88 08/14/2009 4:56 PM
Hide
-11+

Yes, Firefox could easily have 1 billion downloads. On our campus there is easily 1000 computers(not including students), each one has Firefox. It's included on all of our images and we always update it. I bet our campus alone accounts for at least 10,000 downloads.

Anonymous 08/14/2009 4:59 PM
Hide
-15+

1 billion "downloads". Not "users". Where is the problem with that?

ThisIsMe 08/14/2009 5:00 PM
Hide
-2+

Well I'm sure if Microsoft counted downloads of IE in the same manner, the number would easily be in the tens of billions and likely even hundreds of billions.

But, they didn't think ahead and never started counting. Mozilla's marketing team beat them in that game, just like Apple beat them to the punch with the "I'm a Mac and I'm better than you are PC" tv ads. Now if Microsoft started counting, or just released some numbers that it can at least account for, it would be too late and be like the "I'm a PC" tv ad fiasco.

VioMeTriX 08/14/2009 5:01 PM
Hide
-1+

in my opinion i think they should only account for install base, not all the redownloads (due to reformatting and such) and updates.... but i think that should be for all companies..... i bet the actual install base is closer to 400 million

i_like_pie 08/14/2009 5:05 PM
Hide
-4+

lately, it seems there is a firefox update being pushed every 2 weeks . . . So, yeah, not surprising they reached that number.

Ryric 08/14/2009 5:07 PM
Hide
-2+

In that they have disclosed that they include updates and its not just single unique users...I think it is fine. Heck I've download the client (not including updates probably 6 or 7 times what with reformating HD's and such...

eyemaster 08/14/2009 5:08 PM
Hide
-1+

Including the updates is crooked in my view. If MS would include that in their numbers, they would have like 50 billion downloads if not more. MS releases patches monthly.

Firefox should just add how many people actually download the software as an install, not the automatic updates.

Botia 08/14/2009 5:12 PM
Hide
-1+

20-30 of those are probably mine. It's probably right for the number of downloads, but should not be confused with the number of users.

duckmanx88 08/14/2009 5:13 PM
Hide
-1+

is that woman stupid? i myself have downloaded firefox like 5 times to try it from version 2 to 3.5 when IE kept crashing on me before I settled on chrome. man there's always some douche that needs to crash a party. btw IE 8 is SLOW. im forced to use it for netflix. i think i'll download firefox right now and use that for neftflix and nvidia than. sry MS

lafery 08/14/2009 5:15 PM
Hide
-4+

I must have downloaded Firefox over 10 times myself *without* counting any of the automatic updates. 3 computers at home - on which I re-installed Windows from scratch I dunno how many times and so re-downloaded Firefox each time.

Maybe if I didn't have to re-install Windows so much I wouldn't download Firefox as much... Thinking about it I guess we can thank Microsoft for playing such a big part in Firefox' download counts :-)

Sraigux 08/14/2009 5:18 PM
Hide
-0+

Microsoft is only jealous of Mozilla for stealing their browser and ruining their monopoly. With all the updates I've had I'm sure to have done at least 50 downloads. (with uninstalling and re-downloading and the such)

trinix 08/14/2009 5:31 PM
Hide
-2+

Mozilla doesn't claim it has 1B unique users downloading it once without patches.

They are running on their own track, they decided the rules and now some guy comes in and says, on your track you have to follow rules we decide.

No microsoft. It doesn't work like that. They never claimed something that is probably not true. They never claimed unique users. You just want to get in the news and try discrediting them for an achievement they gotten fair and square.

And yes, MS probably has a lot more downloads. But they never made claims and tried to fuse it with their OS, so their downloads is lower anyway (most people get it from the install cd, only updates).

Mozilla and firefox are just busy with a lot of unique downloads on release day and a lot of downloads total. That's the way for them to do marketing. Let them and play your own game MS. You have been doing fine, no need to drag the competition in the dirt. Guess MS is feeling Firefox getting closer and closer and losing the browser war they had total dominance over.

dheadley 08/14/2009 6:03 PM
Hide
-0+

I'd say it is accurate for total downloads. MS probably would have many times that many if you counted all the times windows gets reinstalled and auto-updated to newer IE versions. Prior to putting Vista on all the computers in the house I used to routinely have to rotate around to different computers and reinstall them then re-download FF, so I have accounted for quite a few myself.

Since switching to Vista I do have to admit I've only had to reinstall three times on four computers so far since its release. Strangely two of those reinstalls were the result of installing OneCare on the systems when they expanded it to work on Vista and it leaving the systems totally fubar, couldn't do anything to restore or repair them at all.

domenic 08/14/2009 6:03 PM
Hide
-0+

The capaign gives the impression that there's 1 bilion users. It's deceiving. Why would anyone care about downloads? - especially updates? I'm not dumping on Mozilla, MS probably uses the same advertising & propmotional tacticts. IT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL.

Mrhappy50 08/14/2009 6:20 PM
Hide
-0+

Microsoft is just jealous that Mozilla has a MUCH BETTER browser than they do

thearm 08/14/2009 6:26 PM
Hide
-2+

I would agree. With all the Fire Fox fanboys out there, I'm sure they had a hand in the amount of downloads. No doubt.

duesouth 08/14/2009 6:31 PM
Hide
-1+

why should I pay for something that is completely free. Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird are 10 times better then well things that you need to pay for. hence Linux. Linux is free and mostly virus free. well enough said. you can use internet explorer and get script virus auto downloaded. hmm up to you. free or pay. I think that must user will go with free...

Anonymous 08/14/2009 6:36 PM
Hide
-0+

They said downloads, not users, so they are 100% correct. Apparently MS doesn't like the fact that Mozilla catches up to them more everyday. Of the 10billion IE users, very few actually choose to use it, most use it out of apathy. There's probably less than a million people who consciously choose IE, the rest use it because it comes with Windows.

sailfish 08/14/2009 6:53 PM
Hide
--1+

When you can't compare on the wealth of features, all that's left is to attack a meaningless number, I suppose?

Shadow703793 08/14/2009 7:08 PM
Hide
-0+

Also does this include FireFox portable? If so I own 10+ Flash drives/portable HDDs each with FF Portable loaded. So does that count too... if so it could easily be over 1 billion with updates.

Bynextfall 08/14/2009 7:14 PM
Hide
-0+

Well considering I probably downloaded Firefox about 50 times since it came out Id say the number is probably a bit lower.

megamanx00 08/14/2009 7:15 PM
Hide
-2+

brendano257 :
I think Microsoft is being a whinny little kid ^_^



They've been hanging out with EA :D

theuerkorn 08/14/2009 7:24 PM
Hide
-3+

It says "downloads" which can be multiple ones per user too. I downloaded FF probably 5 - 10 times myself. But it's marketing and every company does it the same way. While Microsoft seems to argue that one download should equate to one user, Firefox never claimed that. It's just the typical trash talk.

Hellbound 08/14/2009 7:33 PM
Hide
-2+

I have many computers at home for a small render farm, 13 in all. I downloaded Firefox to each one.

In 2 years I've downloaded Firefox a good 30+ times for myself and friends. My mother, who is 67 years old, purchased a computer for the first time last week. I downloaded Firefox for her.

Yes, I can see Firefox reaching 1 billion downloads..


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown

    Our Windows Vista coverage began with a hands-on diary by MobilityGuru's Barry Gerber, followed by an assessment of gameplay under Windows Vista by graphics presidente Darren Polkowski, as well as a complete feature rundown of Vista. Barry took the new operating system and its look & feel with a grain of salt, while Darren was disappointed because OpenGL support was dropped along the way, meaning that Windows Vista currently offers horrible performance for graphics applications utilizing the Open Graphics Library. We are sure that mainstream users will appreciate the improved usability of Windows Vista, and the average office/multimedia user will likely never notice the lack of OpenGL. However, a chapter on the overall performance of Windows Vista requires more dedication. In particular, two things require an in-depth analysis: Basic Windows Vista Performance How does Windows Vista perform compared to Windows XP? Will applications execute equally quickly, or will they even run slower due to the new features and the AeroGlass interface? Windows Vista Performance Enhancements With SuperFetch and ReadyBoost, Windows Vista introduces two features to make use of today's technology in order to improve the user experience. This means that more application data should be actively cached into all available memory (SuperFetch), whether that is physical RAM or a USB Flash memory device (ReadyBoost). Microsoft's goal was to create balanced performance by removing delays in everyday work. This article deals with basic application execution under Windows Vista Enterprise, which is representative of the other editions. We put together a high-end test system and performed a comprehensive benchmark session both with Windows XP Professional and with Windows Vista Enterprise to see if there are differences. And indeed, we found that there are some... Software And Vista Although the main Windows Vista core has undergone lot of modifications, many of your applications will work with Vista. There is, however, no guarantee. You should definitely try any essential software on Windows before you upgrade. Process scheduling and thread pooling have been improved in Vista; a deadlock protection mechanism and hardware partitioning for virtualization support were added, together with many more features. We tried lots of different programs under Windows Vista Enterprise, and came up with a list of software that definitely works. Games Call of Duty 2 Far Cry F.E.A.R. Unreal Tournament 2004 Applications Adobe Acrobat 8 Adobe Photoshop CS2 Autodesk 3DSMax 8.0 AutoGK 2.4 Hamachi KeePass 1.06 LAME MP3 Encoder MainConcept H.264 Encoder Miranda Messager 0.5.1 Microsoft Office 2003 Microsoft Office System 2007 Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.1 Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 Nokia PC Suite 6.82.22.0 Ogg Vorbis 1.1.2 OpenOffice 2.1 Picasa 2 Putty Skype 2.5.x and 3.0 SmartFTP 2.0 Sungard Adaptive Credit Risk Calculation 3.0 SonyEricsson PC Suite 1.30.82 SQLyog 5.22 Symantec AntiVirus 10.2.0.224 UltraEdit 32 12.10 WinRAR 3.70 XviD 1.2.0 Benchmarks 3DMark 06 Cinebench PCMark05 Pro SiSoft Sandra 2007 SPECviewperf 9.03 In other cases there were some issues. We found Vista updates for the Futuremark benchmark programs 3DMark and PCMark, as well as the popular data compression tool WinRAR. Lots of video-related software such as DivX could no longer be installed; new versions are required. The popular audio player WinAMP 5.32 throws up an error at startup, yet it works properly. Quake IV can still be executed, but the installation program did not work. Applications that run their own memory management won't benefit from Vista's SuperFetch function. For example, Adobe Photoshop takes care of creating a temporary work file every time it launches - Vista has no access to this process and cannot speed it up. There are some types of software that you should only use if they have been specifically designed for Windows Vista: firewalls, anti-spyware and anti-virus software needs to be Vista-Ready. Microsoft Windows Vista Home Basic (License... (2 offers) Online shop Price Royaldiscount.com $47.99 VioSoftware.com $119.99 See more products Join our discussion on this topic

  • Box.net

    Box.net is similar to Xdrive and Omnidrive, in that it's focused more on storage than on pure backup. With Box.net, as far as we could determine, there is also no client application to download: the whole storage experience is online. That said, the online experience is very slick and really is built around extending the accessibility of the stored files, more than any other service we tested for this review. The main dashboard for Box.net provides the first real indication that this service is not like the others. While sharing files with another user is a standard feature for online storage, Box.net also enable you to create widgets for your storage and post files to your blog, and it lets users track what you've uploaded with RSS. The widget creation is slick, fast and easy, and takes your stored data and presents it in a way that no other online storage service we tested could currently do. Like Omnidrive, Box.net also now includes Zoho integration, so you can actually edit your Word and Excel files online too. Expanding Box.net even further, there are a number add-ons for it that integrate the online storage services capabilities into other applications. These include Adobe Acrobat, Adobe Photoshop, Autodesk 3ds Max, Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Office and Open Office. Box.net doesn't have a client download, however, so there is no direct Windows shell or drive mapping for Box.net that can be easily done, unlike some of the other services we tested. With all the add-on extra functionality, though, it's not something that is likely to be terribly missed.

  • Taking Linux On The Road With Ubuntu

    Many users get annoyed by everyday troubles that still affect Windows systems. Whether it is a failing driver, problems caused by poorly written applications or a virus infection, any consumer type version of Windows can be considered more susceptible to problems than a decent Linux distribution. So why not use Linux instead? There are different options in the Linux space; Red Hat and SuSe are two of the most popular ones. However, thorough success of Linux has been prevented by the many differences between available distributions, and by the fact that Windows not only has a nice look and feel, it also offers the broadest selection of software. Finally, changing habits is always rather difficult. Yet one thing can be said for sure: If you really want to try going without Windows, anyone with at least a small amount of experience can certainly do it. Some time is required to get accustomed to the distribution you choose, and to browse forums for information. After that, selecting the software you want to use will also consume some time, but again you can be sure to find something that fits your needs. For example, Open Office replaces Microsoft Office, Thunderbird takes care of your email, and you probably already know about Mozilla's Firefox browser. There is an open source solution for everything you might want to do under Linux - we recommend sites such as sourceforge.net to begin your open source experience. Unlike Windows, most Linux distributions have a very modular structure, which means that you can choose to install a very slim basic system and a few, specialized modules only. As a result, a minimum installation does not require more than a few hundred megaBytes. This enables a pretty interesting application model: How about storing your operating system, including some applications, on a highly mobile device? This is exactly what the Ubuntu H2 was designed for.

Ads

Best offers

Dell Small Business Windows 7 Professional (Full Product) $299.99 Dell Small Business More info
Newegg.com Office 2007 Home and Student (Full... $119.95 Newegg.com More info
Dell Small Business Windows 7 Home Premium (Upgrade) $119.99 Dell Small Business More info
Dell Small Business Windows 7 Ultimate (Full Product) $319.99 Dell Small Business More info
Dell Small Business Norton Internet Security 2010 - 3 Users $69.99 Dell Small Business More info
Ads
All about Software
 Latest Software articles
Troubleshooting Windows 7 With Microsoft's Built-In Tools

Troubleshooting Windows 7 With Microsoft's Built-In Tools
Windows 7 is more stable and responsive than Vista, but no operating system is perfect (the same goes for the drivers and apps running on it). We show you a suite of tools built into Microsoft’s shiny new OS to help you troubleshoot your Windows 7 issues. Read More

  • Windows 7 And Windows Vista: Performance Compared
    Microsoft is hyping Windows 7 as the operating system that everyone should adopt. We'd already done a bit of benchmarking in the new OS, but we revisit a longer list of tests today, including more real-world tasks, like boot-up, hibernate, and shutdown. Read More
All Software articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post
Popular Searches

Partners

Ads

Sponsored links