Best offers
|
Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade from... | $79.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Office 2007 Home and Student (Full... | $105.73 Royaldiscount.com More info |
|
Windows Anytime Upgrade Windows 7... | $139.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Windows 7 Professional (Upgrade) | $89.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Office 2007 Professional (Academic) | $127.89 Royaldiscount.com More info |
Benchmarking Windows 7: Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger?
Often hailed as the solution to Windows Vista performance problems, we wanted to know just how much better Windows 7 really is. We put one of our most recent test platforms through its paces to find out, benchmarking raw performance and responsiveness. Read More
-
Tom's Definitive Linux Software Roundup: Communications Apps
This is the second part of our Linux Software Roundup. Part one covered Internet Apps. Today we'll be looking at Communications Apps. This includes personal information managers, email clients, instant messengers, VoIP software, and IRC clients. Read More
-
How To: Windows XP Mode In...Ubuntu Linux?
Windows 7's XP Mode has already convinced many users who sat out for Vista to go out and upgrade. But will they buy the right version of Windows 7 to get XPM? You do know you can get the same XP functionality from a Linux distribution for free, right? Read More
Partners
The Games selection
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
Sponsored links
No More Service Packs for Windows XP
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (51) |
- Share
Microsoft is not releasing any additional service packs for all versions of Windows XP.
Looks like an era is coming to an end, as Microsoft is now shifting its focus away from supporting old-timer Windows XP on a service pack level, and looking at the hot new chick in town, the sexy Windows 7. According to Softpedia, SP3 was the last service pack for the 32-bit version of Windows XP (x86); SP2 was the last major update for the 64-bit version (x64). Microsoft officially announced the end of the road for the 32-bit version some time ago, but there was hope that the company would puke up another service pack for x64 XP before the OS headed out to the pasture.
Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be the case. If fact, Microsoft confirmed its legal separation from Windows XP on a whole, admitting that it's fallen out of love and will never return again, even in the case of x64 XP. "We have received inquiries from our customers and partners on whether or not there will be a need for a Service Pack 3 for Windows Server 2003," said Crissy House, the Windows Server Operations manager. "Microsoft will not have a SP3 release for Windows Server 2003."
In the past, Microsoft has delivered service packs for the 64-bit version of Windows XP and major updates to Server 2003 at the same time, hence the assumption that the same cut-off date applied to x64. While the comment from House refers to Windows Server 2003, a spokesman for Microsoft told Softpedia that the divorce also applies to any version of Windows XP.
Thanks for the memories, you were a good OS.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Windows XP Home or Professional?
- What do i need to do
- Corruption on files - any ideas
- Old machines do just fine
- Windows XP Pro Upgrade CD
- Underclocking the Q6600 multiplier?
- Gigabyte GA-X48-DQ6, blue screen problem
- First build; need to install patch; don't know how
- MSI K9N nForce 550 won't boot!
- Memory Slower after XP reinstall
- Installing a new motherboard.. Help
- A few questions for my first build
- Newbie + E8600, help please.
- need advise on OS with new/old sytem build
Related articles
-
The PE Builder program that installs Windows XP onto your USB flash drive requires an actual Windows XP CD. If you already have a Windows XP CD that integrates Service Pack 2, skip this section and jump ahead to the heading that reads "Adding Utilities". Pre-installing Updates Create a new folder on your hard disk (something like C:\sp2\winxp will do nicely). Use Windows Explorer to copy the entire contents of your Windows CD into that folder. To make sure that hidden files and system files are also copied, make sure that you've set Folder Options in Explorer to "Show hidden files and folders" and have unchecked the box next to "Hide protected operating system files (Recommended)" as described earlier in this article. Create a second folder named C:\sp2\sp2 for the update files as well. Download The Service Pack Installing Service Pack 2: The Setup Assistant activates all the Setup files from Windows XP You'll either want to obtain the free Update-CD for Service Pack 2 or download the 256 MB file for this service pack from Microsoft.com/downloads . Download the version called "Windows XP Service Pack 2 for IT Professionals and Developers". If you want the download for a language other than English, select the language from the "Change Language" pull-down menu, then click "Download". Save this file (which shows up in Internet Explorer as "Windows XP-KB835935-SP2-ENU.exe") in a file named "xpsp2.exe" into the C:\sp2 folder. If you've got the SP2 CD, copy the file named "xpsp2.exe" into that folder instead. Open a command window using the Start, Run menu entries, then type "cmd" into the Open: text box, and click the OK button. You can then extract the contents of the service pack by typing the following instruction at the command line: C:\sp2\xpsp2.exe -u -x:c:\sp2\sp2 Updating The XP Setup Files You can update all of the XP Setup files in the "C:\sp2\winxp" folder with the following command line instruction: C:\sp2\sp2\i386\update\update.exe -s:c:\sp2\winxp The Setup Assistant activates all of the updated XP Setup files, as part of which the file named "win51ip.SP2" appears in the "C:\sp2\winxp" folder. Double-click the file named "C:\sp2\winxp\README.HTM" to open that file in your default Web browser. This file should contain the statement that "This release of Windows Microsoft Windows XP includes Service Pack 2 (SP2)" (on versions of Windows XP that integrate SP 2, and on versions of Windows MCE 2005, this text appears when you click the hyperlink that reads "Important Information About This Version of Microsoft XP".
-
System Hardware CPU Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800 (2.93 GHz) Motherboard Asus P5W64 WS Pro (rev 1.01, BIOS 0802) with Intel 975X Chipset Memory 4 GB (4 x 1 GB) Corsair XMS2-6400 (CM2X10246400-C3) at CL 4.0-4-4-12 Optical Drive Samsung SH-D163A , SATA150 Power Supply Zalman, ATX 2.01, 510 Watts Hard Drive Western Digital WD1500ADFD 150 GB System Software & Drivers Operating System Windows XP Service Pack 2 3D API Update DirectX 9.0c Intel Chipset Version 8.3.1.1009 (INF Update of 24 September 2007) Driver ATI FireGL V7300 Catalyst 8.391.2.1.1.1-070924a Driver ATI FireGL V7600 Catalyst 8.42-070820m Driver Nvidia Quadro FX 4500 Forceware 162.62 Driver Nvidia Quadro FX 4600 Forceware 162.62 SPEC Benchmarks Settings Application settings according to SPEC Project Group Rules, driver using application optimizations if available SPEC Benchmarks Used SpecViewperf 10.0 SPECapc 3ds Max 9 (3D Studio Max) SPECapc Solidworks 2007 SPECapc Maya 6.5 3D Studio Max 9: Test Results 3D Studio Mac, which is now available in version 9, is one of the most popular content creation programs in the market. Tom's Hardware tests it with Service pack 2. One particular feature is that the user can choose between the two APIs Direct3D and OpenGL. While OpenGL was the clear favourite in the past, Direct3D (DirectX) is gaining the upper hand this year. Essentially, this is due to the better support of the hardware shaders. In our assessment, real application benchmarks (SPECapc 3ds Max 9) play a more important role than the synthetic tests with Viewperf 10.0. It is interesting to see that the differences in the application benchmarks are not as pronounced as they are in the synthetic test results. The FireGL V7600 takes the lead in two individual tests, while the Quadro FX 4600 takes the Graphics test.The hardware shader test produced some unexpected results. Here, the old FX 4500 pulls ahead of the newer FX 4600 - a reproducible idiosyncrasy that can probably be remedied in a future driver release.
-
Of course, those folks who prefer the Windows operating system can simply install it on to their KPC. We installed Windows XP for testing purposes, and added all service packs and updates. While the KPC is a value system, not a high one, loading XP on the KPC via a USB DVD drive proved quite simple and satisfying. The install time was not noticeably different than installing off of an IDE or SATA based drive, the drivers supplied with the system worked well, and the Windows OS was responsive even after installing a trial of Norton Internet Security. This system worked flawlessly, and could prove to be a nice option for a low-cost small form factor PC. We could easily do the daily tasks that the KPC is meant for, and did not find any shortcomings in this environment. Users could not tell whether they were on the small form factor KPC or the Compaq EVO that it replaced; they generally just liked that it worked and we had no complaints during the day of Windows testing. TV tuner installed Our first thought after loading Windows XP was that the KPC could work as a media center. We broke out an old MSI Theater 550 analog TV tuner and installed it. I did not go to the trouble to install Windows Media Center or Vista Ultimate or Premium, but just used the suite of software that came with the tuner card. The system worked well enough to record live TV, pause it and play it back. Watching TV The system is very quiet as it is, and there is enough room to install some sound dampening material to further lower HDD access noise. There is also a space for a 92 mm fan that could be used to help cool the system due to the added load. The KPC could easily be used as a small PVR for those with a standard VGA connection. If you want DVI then you could install a PCI-based video card and then add a USB tuner card, but the KPC case does not seem well suited as a HTPC as it lacks internal space for a DVD drive. An external drive could of course be used, but it would ruin the unit’s clean appearance.









It was the best OS MSFT has done till Vista. Farewell and rest in peace, XP.
Win2k was the best before Vista, 7 is the best overall IMO.
"but there was hope that the company would puke up another service pack for x64 XP before the OS headed out to the pasture"
Another not so professional piece by Kevin Parrish.
I'm running Windows 7 RTM at home (got it through MSDN subscription) and sadly I'm still using XP at work . XP Was good at his time, but if you only try Win 7 for a short while, there's no going back, the difference is huge. I've run Win 7 for 31 days and 19 hours without reboot and it was still running like I just started it, that's way above XPs league regarding system stability.
M$ Fail.
can't expect MS to keep pouring resources to XP forever...
it has to stop at some point and move on...
now the question is will MS support Vista as long as XP did?
As a home user I don't much care about XP anymore since I've moved on to Vista and will make the move to 7 as soon as it hits retail, but I'm not so sure what the IT guys at my college will think about it.
I had hoped MS would kill the 32bit versions with Win7, lets hope the next installment won't offer 32bit versions anymore.
Had they killed the 32bit versions, people still running Pentium 4's (there are many that do) would not be able to run it. So why would that even begin to be a good idea. A lot of people are too cheap to buy a new PC yet may want the new o/s since vista ran fine on P4's as well. Plus I still have a cr&pload of spare pentium 4 parts and built one win7 machine already and it runs perfectly fine. Can't run 64bit on that one. I'm glad they still make 32bit, makes life a lot simpler. Would rather not use windows XP at all at home ever again, it is too bland and outdated. Not to mention it is like a rare earth magnet picking up nails when it comes to malware.
For the record, look at wikipedia. They're going to keep making patches till 2014. I don't call that dead.
I installed Windows 7 Ultimate (32-bit) on my cpu but went back to Windows XP Home Edition because Win 7 was slower on my PC. My PC is only a Pent 4 (2.4ghz) / 1.2GB pc800 Rambus RAMM / geforce 7600 gs.
I thought Win 7 was great and will deff have it with my new system in the future. It's deff not for older systems. XP is the best by far for older systems.
but that's like a 9 year old computer
Pretty much yes
. Just saying Win 7 is great, just not for my system.
At least they're putting the Windows XP out to pasture instead of outright killing it!
The Old Nag sure gave us a run for our money!
im using sp3 now, i dont see a reason for msoft to keep supporting it, running quite well on socket a 1.8 with 256mb ram
For the record, look at wikipedia. They're going to keep making patches till 2014. I don't call that dead.
And who do you trust more, Wikipedia or MS Server Operations manager?
I just hope that for simplicity's sake, when by 2014 they stop rolling out individual fixes they release a final "Service Pack"/patch pack, or whatever they want to call it, with all the fixes since SP3. Have you ever had to install an old operating system just to have to spend another hour or so installing dozens of patches instead of one big thing ? I know it's asking too much, but perhaps they could do it without much effort. It would make things a lot simpler and close the XP cycle. That way, whenever you needed to install the then legacy XP you knew: I have to install SP3 and the final patch pack and I'm done! (and at my own risk, of course hehehe, just like with Win 98SE like I do with my ancient artifact, a 1995 Cyrix 5x86 100Mhz on a 486 board
Why not just do better testing instead of patching the damn operating system. The real problem is new buggy features keep coming out with each new service pack. Property testing would minimize the need for service patches.
Why not just do better testing instead of patching the damn operating system. The real problem is new buggy features keep coming out with each new service pack. Property testing would minimize the need for service patches.
If they kept testing software till there were no more bugs it would NEVER get released, bugs will always get by, no matter the company or the software.
I hated XP, was in love with vista and now in love with 7. Rot in peace, XP.
Aww... guess like I won't have SP3 for XP x64. (I use it for CAD). But anyways, XP is dead. Time to move on to Win 7 x64 (I run RTM anyways ) for everyone.
XP is dead? LOL?! XP has about 65% of the market, Vista at about 25%. And keep in MIND that MS does include PCs shipped with Vista-Business, but up-graded to XP-Pro as a "Vista" sale.
Vista is closer to death. When 2014 comes around, there WILL STILL more XP systems in use than Vista.
As of today, its still possible to buy WindowsXP and even with Win7-Pro, the owner can change the OS to XP. Somehow I doubt that anyone will be going out of their way to buy Vista after this October.
By the way... I don't see any reason that XP would need a new Service Pak. What does it need?
PS: I use Win7-RC on 3 out of 4 PCs in my home. Only my main desktop is WinXP.
Why not just do better testing instead of patching the damn operating system. The real problem is new buggy features keep coming out with each new service pack. Property testing would minimize the need for service patches.
With all the hardware and various software Windows supports and different configurations that would be impossible some are unique to the users system. However most stuff gets caught in beta testing and mass market testing before launch.
XP is dead? LOL?! XP has about 65% of the market, Vista at about 25%. And keep in MIND that MS does include PCs shipped with Vista-Business, but up-graded to XP-Pro as a "Vista" sale.Vista is closer to death. When 2014 comes around, there WILL STILL more XP systems in use than Vista.As of today, its still possible to buy WindowsXP and even with Win7-Pro, the owner can change the OS to XP. Somehow I doubt that anyone will be going out of their way to buy Vista after this October. By the way... I don't see any reason that XP would need a new Service Pak. What does it need?PS: I use Win7-RC on 3 out of 4 PCs in my home. Only my main desktop is WinXP.
There are currently over 50patches after SP3 that can be included in a SP.
Perhaps even hundreds, but about 50 on my system; especially Internet Explorer security patches.
There will be plenty machines still running XP.
I'm going to run it at least another 2 years, unless some unexpected serious internet security threats show up.
It's still the best OS for laptops, older desktops, and netbooks!
Long live XP!
I'm running Windows 7 RTM at home (got it through MSDN subscription) and sadly I'm still using XP at work . XP Was good at his time, but if you only try Win 7 for a short while, there's no going back, the difference is huge. I've run Win 7 for 31 days and 19 hours without reboot and it was still running like I just started it, that's way above XPs league regarding system stability.
I run XP for several months non-stop, with an occasional standby, and never experienced any trouble. I don't remember keeping my XP online for over 4 months in a row though!
... yaeh... time to move on... XP is still good... and will be around for the many usable single core 1 gig systems... but if you have a dual or more core system with at least 2 gig... windows 7 looks promising... ok... it haz some isues like vista, like multichannel sound for many audio programs, but that is most part because of the driver support... but the benefits even it out... i use Win7 RC...
At least they're putting the Windows XP out to pasture instead of outright killing it!
haha yes!
off to the slaughter house... =P
good riddens
M$ Fail.
Cry Some Maor.
Seriously, XP is old. Its 8 years old. Its time to move on. Windows 7 is excellent. Stop trying to stagnate improvements.
If only people moved as fast as the software/hardware companies we could be at light speed PCs by now.....
MicroS**t should be forced to continue supporting ALL of it's past OS, or let me become open source. Instead they are allowed to periodically force everyone to at some point adopt their latest and (greatest???) OS release. The "geniuses" on the European courts continue to force MicroS**t to take out add-ons that benefit the public, but wont' do what is necessary, and force both MicroS**t and Apple to make their OS' open source.
I will stick with XP until Microsoft remove DRM from its operating systems, which is designed AGAINST user, not for user.