Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Intel Hints at Octa-Core CPUs this Year

By - Source: Tom's Hardware US | B 37 comments

In an interview with IDG, Intel's Shannon Poulin gave an update on when the company will ship its first octa-core processor--that's eight cores.

With the state of the economy in virtual shambles, the stark reality is that huge corporations are not only laying off employees left and right, but pulling back on advertisement spending and cutting cost in various ways. It's truly remarkable to see manufacturers continue on despite the financial instability, to stay on a path that may or may not bring financial success although the process may be a bit slower than usual.

Despite the drop in consumer spending, Intel maintains innovation, refusing to stagger in a difficult recession. Shannon Poulin, the Xeon platform director in Intel's Server Products Group, reaffirms Intel's determination by laying down a somewhat vague roadmap for the Xeon (Nehalem) EX release schedule. "What you'll get at the beginning of next year--late this year or the beginning of next year--will be the push into the four-socket, eight-socket, and above space," she told IDG News Services in an interview.

Poulin also reaffirmed that the recession has nothing to do with the Xeon EX schedule, noting that the company usually sees a lag between the two-socket and four-socket (and above) releases. Previously the "historic" low was seven to eight months in-between, with the largest gap lasting around a year and a half. She said the release of the Xeon EX falls "right in the middle," referring to the shipment of Nehalem-based Xeon chips back in March.

Intel's Nehalem EP, now available in Mac Pro workstations, is the latest line of x86 server chips designed for workstations and servers that consist of one or two processors, with up to four cores on a single processor. The Nehalem EX architecture takes the design one step further and supports servers with four or more processors. Not only will they have up to eight core on a single chip, but will feature support for Intel's QuickPath Interconnect technology and utilize an on-chip memory controller.

Earlier this year, the company revealed that the eight-core Xeon processor will feature a whopping 2.3 billion transistors, manufactured using the 45nm process. The Xeon EX will also utilize Intel's simultaneous multithreading technology that will support two simultaneous threads per core (although this may decrease performance by a meager percentage). The processor will also feature four point-to-point quick path interconnect links, and L3 cache consisting of eight sections that will be shared by all eight cores, allocated by a central hub router. The upcoming processor will also require a new platform with LGA-1567 sockets.

Unfortunately, at this point, there is a six month window planned for the Xeon EX release, starting around October 2009 until March 2010. That, of course, is subject to change, as the company has not released an official street date despite Poulin's predictions. When released, the octa-core Xeon will be the company's first, and most likely the flagship for some time to come. It will be exciting to see the Xeon EX processor in action. Unfortunately, the planned release is still a long ways away, so we'll just have to pacify ourselves with comic books and donuts until then.

Display 37 Comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    bourgeoisdude , April 7, 2009 8:14 PM
    Unfortunately, the planned release is still a long ways away, so we'll just have to pacify ourselves with comic books and donuts until then.

    That's actually pretty funny. Also...

    ...shouldn't it be octo-core, not octa-core?
  • 1 Hide
    pharge , April 7, 2009 8:32 PM
    hmmm.... what am I going to need 8-cores in my PC for?... playing games?.. that only use 1-2 cores.. running virus scnning at the same time? Ripping movies or making MPEG4 at the background? doing filtering or 3D modeling of my images at the background?... hmm... sounds cool... but guess I will need mind connected twin to enjoy this kind of "super" computer..lol How am I going to play game(s), running office, licenting music, while making MPEG4 and building 3D model at teh same time?... lol

    This sounds like another example when the hardware development is way ahead of software development. The time when all the goodies are just eye candies... they melt in our eyes but not in our mouths....>_<

    lol
  • 2 Hide
    deltatux , April 7, 2009 8:40 PM
    All the Mac Pros at my college have 8 cores and it's blazin' fast esp when I'm editing photos using Photoshop there. Now I have an Phenom II 810 so I'm not too envious as long as it gets my job done relatively quickly.

    I think for most people quadcores should last us for at least 3 - 4 years before we actually need to jump to octocore. I'd even say sexacore (6 cores) would be already pushing it before we really need 8 cores.
  • 2 Hide
    08nwsula , April 7, 2009 9:00 PM
    8 cores? pfft. I want 32.
  • 1 Hide
    Hatecrime69 , April 7, 2009 9:09 PM
    08nwsula8 cores? pfft. I want 32.


    Well..
    8 cores x 4 sockets = 32 cores :D 

    But this sounds like something intended for servers, nothing suggesting 8 core desktops
  • 0 Hide
    A Stoner , April 7, 2009 9:19 PM
    I want 8 cores. I am already having to decide what processes have to share one of the four I have. Then again, I also need to double my memory or even quadruple it in order to run all the extra applications I am dreaming of running at once.
  • 0 Hide
    fonzy , April 7, 2009 9:38 PM
    What about that 80-core CPU they have touting?Is that just a server chip or will it become mainstream?....possibly in the next gen consols in a few years?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=We_PRtRfiNs
  • 0 Hide
    rigaudio , April 7, 2009 9:39 PM
    Most of the population do not even need 4 cores, let alone 8. But hey, I wouldn't mind :3
  • 0 Hide
    cjl , April 7, 2009 9:39 PM
    2.3 billion?

    Damn. And here I thought the 1.4 billion transistor GT200 was a huge chip.
  • -2 Hide
    Anonymous , April 7, 2009 9:56 PM
    deltatux:

    Wake up! They are touching 8 core in ONE package... not TWO chips...

    Everybody else:

    Have you people not heard yet about MULTITHREAD OPTIMIZED SOFTWARE?
    Damn... people that comment news seems to forget basic facts... Come on people, start to think a little before commenting...

    Even UT3 that's not THAT new scales with processor core count... imagine the next year's software... Almost EVERY computer now have at least TWO cores, so core scalability is becoming a MUST in software dev...

    In 2 and a half years, 8 cores is gonna be the mainstream, and hexa core is gonna be the premium systems...
  • 2 Hide
    megamanx00 , April 7, 2009 10:02 PM
    Well they have to keep pushing. If they become complacent again AMD will pass them. I'm not sure if AMD has really learned that lesson as it happened to them when they were so busy enjoying the success of their 90nm Athlon X2s they slowed down 65nm development (a contributing factor to the delay of the Phenom and its TLB debacle) and decreased IPC in their 65nm Brisbane.
  • 2 Hide
    pharge , April 7, 2009 10:05 PM
    BTW, 8 cores?... hmmm... that kind of remind me of the CELL processor (the one in the PS3)...lol.... 1 PPE + 8 SPE.... hmm... can we call it a 9 core processor, too?...;)
    Though it is really quite a different story... but just can't help not to think about it...lol
  • 0 Hide
    anamaniac , April 7, 2009 10:41 PM
    Comics and donuts... I love you now.
  • 5 Hide
    Claimintru , April 7, 2009 10:54 PM
    Quote:
    It's truly remarkable to see manufacturers continue on despite the financial instability


    What are they supposed to do? Say the economy isn't so great and give up making money?

    This and Parrish making a joke out of a guy being killed in front of his computer(see other news article) only confirm his complete lack of writing talent and taste....that and all his articles follow the exact same format. Vague lead-in with broad references, company specific facts that most people know, the actual article, trying to end on a light note. Every single Kevin Parrish article is identical
  • 2 Hide
    apache_lives , April 7, 2009 11:14 PM
    Heh all we need is the desktop variant, and programmers to make use of 64-bit and multi-threading PROPERLY
  • 3 Hide
    NuclearShadow , April 7, 2009 11:18 PM
    Didn't Intel promise 50 core CPU's by 2012? Really this is simply getting out of hand. If software developers don't start catching up and making use out of these CPU's who is going to buy them?
  • 0 Hide
    hellraiser06 , April 7, 2009 11:20 PM
    Quote:
    What are they supposed to do? Say the economy isn't so great and give up making money?

    This and Parrish making a joke out of a guy being killed in front of his computer(see other news article) only confirm his complete lack of writing talent and taste....that and all his articles follow the exact same format. Vague lead-in with broad references, company specific facts that most people know, the actual article, trying to end on a light note. Every single Kevin Parrish article is identical


    I second that. I just read the other article in which a guy got killed in front of his computer. Editors, please take care of this guy. He is ruining the forums. NONE of his articles are good to read..
  • 0 Hide
    zedx , April 7, 2009 11:56 PM
    If you don't use 4 or even 2 cores that doesn't mean that 8 core systems shouldn't pop up. That's like saying there shouldn't be any geforce/radeon because of IGC. They are so many tasks like rendering, compiling etc. I'm not going to buy this though as I'm waiting for larabee or opencl since my work involves data parallel apps...
  • 0 Hide
    eddieroolz , April 7, 2009 11:56 PM
    Does it actually make much of a difference for 95% of the software out there?

    I think all chipmakers and software vendors should get together and start implementing multi-threaded programming first. What's 8 cores if we can't use more than 2 or 4, right?
  • 0 Hide
    zedx , April 7, 2009 11:58 PM
    zedxIf you don't use 4 or even 2 cores that doesn't mean that 8 core systems shouldn't pop up. That's like saying there shouldn't be any geforce/radeon because of IGC. They are so many tasks like rendering, compiling etc. I'm not going to buy this though as I'm waiting for larabee or opencl since my work involves data parallel apps... And no for most things hardware isn't fat enough like raytracing and real time hair rendering

Display more comments