Samsung granted court injunction against imminent strike action in last-minute reprieve — talks resume as unions barred from occupying or locking facilities, obstructing workers

Samsung strike
(Image credit: Getty / Bloomberg)

Samsung has been granted a last-minute injunction by a South Korean court that limits the scope of strike action planned by disgruntled employees later this week, forcing both sides back to the bargaining table for more talks. The Financial Times reports that the Suwon District Court passed down a ruling on Monday, partially accepting a request from the company to neuter the planned industrial action.

Workers are unhappy over bonus caps and seeking a more generous share of Samsung's profits, amongst other things, in an 18-day walkout scheduled to begin on May 21. Now, the aforementioned court has said that staffing levels required to maintain safety, prevent damage to the facility, and maintain product quality "must remain at normal levels," FT reports. Furthermore, union members and their leaders will not be allowed to occupy or lock company facilities, or to prevent workers from entering them, and will face a fine of $74,000 (100 million won) per day if this order is breached.

While Samsung has already started winding down production at its facilities in anticipation of the walkout, its share price has jumped in early trading as a result of the ruling, which obviously favors the company and will weaken the impact of any strike action, and thereby the bargaining position of the workers.

Latest Videos From

To that end, Reuters reports that Samsung Electronics and the labour union have resumed talks to stop the industrial action. Some 45,000 workers had been expected to take part, although it's unclear how many are affected by the court ruling should the strike go ahead. A statement from the union reported by Reuters said that the action wouldn't stop the strike from going ahead if no deal can be reached, but that the union would "engage seriously" in negotiations.

Previous estimates indicate the strike could cost Samsung a total of 4 trillion won in revenue, with others putting the figure higher at 1 trillion won ($700 million) per day. Workers have already rejected the offer of a one-time bonus payout of $340,000 per employee. No doubt, this offer is undermined somewhat by rival SK hynix, which is set to pay out some $477,000 per employee this year and $900,000 next year. Bonuses at the company remain guaranteed for the next 10 years, putting Samsung's offer in the shade.

South Korea's government has said it will pursue all options to prevent a strike, including an emergency arbitration order. Such a government order would, in theory, prevent strike action for 30 days while mediation and arbitration are conducted by the country's Labor Relations Commission.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Stephen Warwick
News Editor

Stephen is Tom's Hardware's News Editor with almost a decade of industry experience covering technology, having worked at TechRadar, iMore, and even Apple over the years. He has covered the world of consumer tech from nearly every angle, including supply chain rumors, patents, and litigation, and more. When he's not at work, he loves reading about history and playing video games.

  • rluker5
    This is good for Samsung and for consumers in the short term. But the court's justification "Now, the aforementioned court has said that staffing levels required to maintain safety, prevent damage to the facility, and maintain product quality "must remain at normal levels," " sounds like it came straight from the desk of a Samsung manager. Is this how the courts are in other parts of the world? All plants can shut down in an orderly fashion for maintenance without affecting product quality. I don't support the union in this case, but I also don't support the court. I must just be a crank.

    But this is really a boon for Samsung. Seems like they can do anything like those stereotypical big corporations from some movies like Robocop, for example. Maybe we will get some innovative, yet ethically dubious products from them in the future.
    Reply
  • usertests
    rluker5 said:
    Is this how the courts are in other parts of the world?
    Samsung has a lot of power in SK, to say the least. Other than that I'll defer to experts.
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    South Korea? More like Samsung Korea based on what this injunction says. We need to get back to a paradigm of governments being for the people rather than corporate stooges. Everyone at Samsung deserves to benefit from the company's incredible greed good fortune rather than only the executives and investors.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    Now, the aforementioned court has said that staffing levels required to maintain safety, prevent damage to the facility, and maintain product quality "must remain at normal levels," FT reports.

    so effectively courts entirely negate the strikes purpose to reduce staffing to harm company financially?
    Reply
  • tamalero
    usertests said:
    Samsung has a lot of power in SK, to say the least. Other than that I'll defer to experts.
    wasnt one president of Korea indicted for massive bribe scandals and protecting of Samsung's monopolies?
    Reply
  • usertests
    tamalero said:
    wasnt one president of Korea indicted for massive bribe scandals and protecting of Samsung's monopolies?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_South_Korean_political_scandalhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Jae-yong#Monetary_kickbacks,_perjury,_arrest_and_conviction
    Reply