Samsung granted court injunction against imminent strike action in last-minute reprieve — talks resume as unions barred from occupying or locking facilities, obstructing workers

Samsung strike
(Image credit: Getty / Bloomberg)

Samsung has been granted a last-minute injunction by a South Korean court that limits the scope of strike action planned by disgruntled employees later this week, forcing both sides back to the bargaining table for more talks. The Financial Times reports that the Suwon District Court passed down a ruling on Monday, partially accepting a request from the company to neuter the planned industrial action.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Stephen Warwick
News Editor

Stephen is Tom's Hardware's News Editor with almost a decade of industry experience covering technology, having worked at TechRadar, iMore, and even Apple over the years. He has covered the world of consumer tech from nearly every angle, including supply chain rumors, patents, and litigation, and more. When he's not at work, he loves reading about history and playing video games.

  • rluker5
    This is good for Samsung and for consumers in the short term. But the court's justification "Now, the aforementioned court has said that staffing levels required to maintain safety, prevent damage to the facility, and maintain product quality "must remain at normal levels," " sounds like it came straight from the desk of a Samsung manager. Is this how the courts are in other parts of the world? All plants can shut down in an orderly fashion for maintenance without affecting product quality. I don't support the union in this case, but I also don't support the court. I must just be a crank.

    But this is really a boon for Samsung. Seems like they can do anything like those stereotypical big corporations from some movies like Robocop, for example. Maybe we will get some innovative, yet ethically dubious products from them in the future.
    Reply
  • usertests
    rluker5 said:
    Is this how the courts are in other parts of the world?
    Samsung has a lot of power in SK, to say the least. Other than that I'll defer to experts.
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    South Korea? More like Samsung Korea based on what this injunction says. We need to get back to a paradigm of governments being for the people rather than corporate stooges. Everyone at Samsung deserves to benefit from the company's incredible greed good fortune rather than only the executives and investors.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    Now, the aforementioned court has said that staffing levels required to maintain safety, prevent damage to the facility, and maintain product quality "must remain at normal levels," FT reports.

    so effectively courts entirely negate the strikes purpose to reduce staffing to harm company financially?
    Reply
  • tamalero
    usertests said:
    Samsung has a lot of power in SK, to say the least. Other than that I'll defer to experts.
    wasnt one president of Korea indicted for massive bribe scandals and protecting of Samsung's monopolies?
    Reply
  • usertests
    tamalero said:
    wasnt one president of Korea indicted for massive bribe scandals and protecting of Samsung's monopolies?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_South_Korean_political_scandalhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Jae-yong#Monetary_kickbacks,_perjury,_arrest_and_conviction
    Reply