Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

2.5 TB HDD Expected in 2010

By - Source: Tom's Hardware US

The capacity bar has been raised according to TDK's roadmap.

A recent roadmap presented by TDK Corporation--a manufacturer of read/write heads for many hard disk drive (HDD) suppliers--revealed that 640 GB 2.5-inch and 2.5 TB 3.5-inch HDDs should become available around January 2010. For now, Seagate and WD provide HDDs with the largest capacities: 2 TB.

According to Register Hardware, TDK is currently producing high density read/write heads for 250 GB/platter (2.5-inch) and 500 GB/platter (3.5-inch). However, the roadmap indicates that the 2.5-inch drive read heads will jump up to 320 GB/platter (which apparently are already in qualification by its OEMs), and the 3.5-inch drive read heads will move up to 640 GB/platter.

The 3.5-inch 4-platter HDDs are expected to enter mass production in November and exit in January. The 2.5-inch 2-platter drives, on the other hand, will enter manufacturing this month and slip into mass production by December. HDD manufacturers should begin announcing the 2.5-inch drives by the end of the year, and the 3.5-inch drives as early as February 2010.

3.5-inch manufacturers may even provide a possible 3.2 TB, 5-platter model next year.

There are 34 Comments.
Other Comments
  • 3
    mindless728 , August 8, 2009 9:08 AM
    well this is an issue for people that don;t have good raid cards, the lack of support for 64bit LBA in motherboards will render these HDD's useless (without the 64bit LBA you can't have volumes, not partitions, over 2TiB)
  • 2
    hixbot , August 10, 2009 9:35 PM
    I don't see how this is impressive. We've had 2TB for a while. I would think we'd have 4TB by 2010. Personally, I've been noticing a big slow down in the development in bigger HDDs. Some people may not have a use for the space, but many of us do. HDD storage used to double every year, this is weak, if you ask me.
  • 1
    False_Dmitry_II , August 11, 2009 4:13 AM
    WayoffbaseI still can't fill 500gb

    You're doing it wrong.
Display more comments