Intel Says 6-Cores Not Delayed

Yesterday we ran a report indicating that several other sites reported that Intel would be delaying the release of its 32nm 6-core Westmere-based CPU, codenamed Gulftown. Intel's Westmere codename represents the 32nm line of Nehalem micro-architecture processors. Intel today confirmed with us that the reported delay is not true, and that Gulftown has always been a 2010 product.

Some sites, including even Wikipedia, incorrectly indicate Gulftown as being a late 2009 product. Intel's public roadmap says 2010 and Intel representatives confirm that the roadmap has not changed.

Intel's first 32nm CPU line based on the Nehalem architecture will be its Westmere line, starting off with a 2-core CPU slated for Q4'09 production.

Create a new thread in the US News comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
41 comments
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • Anonymous
    Intel says Pentium IV to hit 10ghz
    Intel says Moblin to hit 2 second boot times
    Intel says Atom to be greatest thing since sliced bread
    Intel says Nehalem running at "very healthy" clockspeeds


    Less talk, more engineering samples plzokthx
    12
  • MoUsE-WiZ
    yoda: you mean "programs" or "games"? There's a distinct difference.
    10
  • Other Comments
  • Anonymous
    Intel says Pentium IV to hit 10ghz
    Intel says Moblin to hit 2 second boot times
    Intel says Atom to be greatest thing since sliced bread
    Intel says Nehalem running at "very healthy" clockspeeds


    Less talk, more engineering samples plzokthx
    12
  • Anonymous
    Am i the only one that thinks that the Atom sucks? Sure, it's not very power hungry, but not very power effecient either, i'd rather have something with a battery life of 20 minutes than 9 hours, as long as the things i want done actually gets done in those 20 minutes. But then again im a wee bit impatient. And before you say it, yes, i know "it's not meant to be powerful, it's only meant for surfing the web and light use" and that would be fine, but a price tag of 450 dollars for something like that, is just ridiculous, almost as ridiculous as buying a Mac instead of a PC, if you get my analogy, and if not = It's too expensive for what it is.
    -10
  • yoda8232
    I've still trying to see what programs use 4 cores other than Crysis and Sins of a Solar Empire, this is stupid.
    -10