Jerry Seinfeld Goes Back to Mac

Next news
12:21 PM - October 29, 2009 by Jane McEntegart

Jerry Seinfeld has gone back to Mac after a brief stint starring in Microsoft commercials.

Earlier this year, it emerged that Microsoft was paying Jerry Seinfeld $10 million to appear in advertisements along side Bill Gates. Shortly before the "I'm a PC" series began airing, the company released two very confusing commercials starring Seinfeld and Gates. If you don't remember them, check them out below.

Microsoft Jerry Seinfeld Bill Gates Shoe Circus Commercial

Windows Ad #2 :: New Family - Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld

TUAW reports that in the latest episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm, Jerry Seinfeld is seen discussing ideas with Seinfeld creator Larry David. In the scene, a MacBook Pro is prominently shown on Jerry's desk. Not exactly surprising given the fact that when the Microsoft commercials aired, a lot of people pointed out that Macs have appeared in Jerry's apartment in Seinfeld before. That said, Microsoft probably still isn't pleased. I mean, they did give him ten million bucks to be in a commercial about nothing.

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
Noya 10/29/2009 6:42 PM
Hide
-20+

I'm retarded, I need a one button mouse...

gbismack 10/29/2009 6:46 PM
Hide
-14+

The "commercials" where hilarious. Pointless, but hilarious.

cybrcatter 10/29/2009 6:47 PM
Hide
-20+

Noya :
I'm retarded, I need a one button mouse...



No, you need the Macbook Wheel!

Spanky Deluxe 10/29/2009 6:48 PM
Show
ssalim 10/29/2009 6:49 PM
Hide
-12+

Love the Macbook Wheel vid, so funny.

Anyway, who cares about Jerry? I don't. If a superstar is using a mac (or PC), do I follow just because? hell no.

JMcEntegart 10/29/2009 6:56 PM
Hide
-2+

cybrcatter :
No, you need the Macbook Wheel!



Priceless video!

Parsifal57 10/29/2009 6:56 PM
Hide
-15+

This is news ?

gnice3d 10/29/2009 6:58 PM
Show
akhodjaev 10/29/2009 6:58 PM
Show
ominous prime 10/29/2009 7:06 PM
Show
jonpaul37 10/29/2009 7:07 PM
Show
megamanx00 10/29/2009 7:08 PM
Hide
-1+

The problem with those commercials is that they were trying too hard to be clever. A commercial only has so much time to convince people to buy a product, and even people who get the commercial and think it's clever, spend more time thinking it's clever than thinking they should buy what MS is selling. Of course in trying to hard to be clever those commercials also sometimes failed completely and just ended up being stupid, like the shoe one.

jonpaul37 10/29/2009 7:12 PM
Show
adamovera 10/29/2009 7:24 PM
Hide
--1+

jonpaul37 :
Dan Marino should die of Gonorrhea and rot in hell!


HaHaHaHaHa, Soooo Awesome!

hellwig 10/29/2009 7:24 PM
Hide
-5+

Spanky Deluxe :
You might want to go back to 2005 then when Apple last sold one buttoned mice.



LOL. It only took what, 21 years to adopt a proper mouse (going from the first Mac back in 1984)? That's a pretty good response to emerging technology if I ever saw it.

Personally, I can't stand the limited functionality of 3-button scroll-wheel mice anymore. Give me at least 2 additional thumb buttons!!!

Yoder54 10/29/2009 7:26 PM
Hide
-8+

gnice3d :
Who in their right mind is going to take IT advice from a half jewish, half scientologist comedian?Serves MS right for paying 10 million bucks to a spokesperson who probably can't flush his browser cache.If MS had any clue, they would be running ads showing 3-4 way SLI systems with liquid cooling kits running the Games for Windows titles. It's just retarded that they insist on focusing on the budget PC demographic.One day Microsoft will figure out how to market their platform.Unless the world smartens up and goes completely Linux 8)



What does his ethnic background or religious beliefs have to do with anything?

What you suggest is absurd. How many people could afford one of the builds you suggest? How many would even know what was being said in such an ad? No, MS needs to focus on winning back consumer confidence, and needs to continue targeting all consumers and not an elite few.

ptroen 10/29/2009 7:33 PM
Hide
-3+

Um I think the average consumer would be more confused. Somehow I don't see Seinfield at this point being a credible spokesman. Likable yes. Credible no.

audioee 10/29/2009 7:35 PM
Hide
-5+

Did you ever think that Apple is paying Larry David for product placement? When did "journalists" stop doing research for their articles? Ask the producers of Larry David and Seinfeld if they got paid for product placement?

"That said, Microsoft probably still isn't pleased." Why not ask MS their reaction to the picture instead of assuming what their reaction would be? Or does that take too much time?

Tom's at times seems to post these little tidbits of "News" to insight Mac vs. MS hatred flame wars.

Come on Tom's get to real Journalism and do some research, ask questions of both sides and then write the article.

Spanky Deluxe 10/29/2009 7:36 PM
Hide
-6+

jonpaul37 :
FANBOY!



For pointing out a fact? Not really. Yes I use a Mac but I don't use an Apple mouse. I use a Microsoft mouse (Habu).

hellwig :
LOL. It only took what, 21 years to adopt a proper mouse (going from the first Mac back in 1984)? That's a pretty good response to emerging technology if I ever saw it.Personally, I can't stand the limited functionality of 3-button scroll-wheel mice anymore. Give me at least 2 additional thumb buttons!!!



Yeah Apple have managed to produce some pretty shocking mice over the years. I was hoping the new multitouch one would be better but alas they didn't put in pinch to zoom and rotate support which means its a whole lot of multitouch surface with little use beyond up/down scrolling. A complete waste of technology if you ask me.

Verrin 10/29/2009 7:38 PM
Hide
-2+

Jerry isn't a Scientologist. He's spoken against it before, and he's even made fun it in his own series. Just watch "The Parking Garage" episode (Season 3).

Yoder54 10/29/2009 7:45 PM
Hide
-6+

hellwig :
LOL. It only took what, 21 years to adopt a proper mouse (going from the first Mac back in 1984)? That's a pretty good response to emerging technology if I ever saw it.Personally, I can't stand the limited functionality of 3-button scroll-wheel mice anymore. Give me at least 2 additional thumb buttons!!!



The first Xerox mouse had a single button, and Xerox PARC also designed a three-button model, but reduced the count to two for Xerox products. Apple retained the one button mouse for accessibility reasons, and they also thought that users would be less confused.

In reality, how many people know how to use the full functionality of a mouse? It is a low percentage, though kids pick it up faster than adults. Try explaining how to use the right-click of a mouse to adults...you'd think you were covering planetary mechanics.

Regarding the thumb wheels...I use Logitech Revolution MX mice with both my Windows and Mac OS. Both work the same way regardless of the OS. Two button mice have been available for Mac's for years, it is just that Apple chose not to ship them.

hakesterman 10/29/2009 8:01 PM
Hide
-1+

I could care a less what Jerry does for any PC company. His comercials won't perswade people one way or another, he will make people laugh and that is it. Bottom line is if you want to sell Imac and Macbooks, make them affordable and easy enough to upgrade without haveing to pay a tech to do it. Their Imac's are a sweet system, but you need a masters degree to upgrade it or fix it, and they love that because they get you twice that way.

claudeb 10/29/2009 8:20 PM
Hide
-4+

gnice3d :
.If MS had any clue, they would be running ads showing 3-4 way SLI systems with liquid cooling kits running the Games for Windows titles. 

I don't think that would work.

jecastej 10/29/2009 8:26 PM
Hide
-0+

Guys, don't ever "Ever" leave your computers because outside your work you are not funny or clever and either you don't understand comedy when it mixes with your work... Your look so bitter. Just relax!!! I think Jerry is free to use what ever he likes and we all know what marketing is about from whatever big, medium or small company name. Don't get confused with something funny, commercial and with religions or personal believes.

By the way I don't think Jerry needs 10 millions from anybody: "Not that is anything wrong with it". I think It is MS who's winning here.

hakesterman 10/29/2009 8:28 PM
Hide
--2+

Better yet, have a Gaint PC walking and steping on a small Imac and then haveing the sidepanel on the PC open up and say " We still have 85 percent of the market" Have A Nice Day!


Silluete 10/29/2009 8:35 PM
Hide
--1+

audioee :
Did you ever think that Apple is paying Larry David for product placement? When did "journalists" stop doing research for their articles? Ask the producers of Larry David and Seinfeld if they got paid for product placement?"That said, Microsoft probably still isn't pleased." Why not ask MS their reaction to the picture instead of assuming what their reaction would be? Or does that take too much time? Tom's at times seems to post these little tidbits of "News" to insight Mac vs. MS hatred flame wars. Come on Tom's get to real Journalism and do some research, ask questions of both sides and then write the article.


Dude u speak like my mind. That deserve a +1.

wildwell 10/29/2009 8:36 PM
Hide
-1+

Has Jerry Seinfeld ever had a Windows computer?

@ jonpaul37:

Fact, dumb-ass! The Apple mouse from 2005 until last week has always had 4 buttons. Now it has none.

g8t0r 10/29/2009 8:38 PM
Hide
--2+

Hope he doesnt take it in the bathroom and get red flagged. That would be horrible!

itadakimasu 10/29/2009 8:58 PM
Hide
--1+

Seinfeld hasn't gone back to apple just because the people from Curb Your Enthusiasm gave him a prop mac to use...

jonpaul37 10/29/2009 8:59 PM
Show
ta152h 10/29/2009 9:17 PM
Hide
--2+

I think the commercials with Seinfeld were very good. Bill Gates is still the face of Microsoft, even though he's not CEO anymore. His comic timing is impeccable, as is his talent for understatement. He comes off as very likable, funny, and self-deprecating. In short, he's likeable. The commercials make people like Microsoft more, and that's a good thing for them. It doesn't always have to be simple and to the point to have an effect.

By the way, the first Apple to use a mouse wasn't the MacIntosh. It was the Lisa.


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • The first stage was to change the hard disk. While on the majority of notebooks the hard disk is fairly easy to access (generally by unscrewing one or two screws), the MacBook Pro has to be taken almost completely apart. And as you’ll see, that is no picnic. With A PC With PCs like the Samsung R60 we used to illustrate this article, all you do is remove two screws and lift a panel to access the hard disk, as the illustration shows. With A MacBook Pro The Apple notebook, on the other hand, requires that you disassemble most of the case. Here are pictures of all the stages in our installation of the SSD in a MacBook Pro. Note that the SSD, despite its high price (around $700 not including tax), is rather poorly finished. To give you an example, we had to tap into the case in order to use the original MacBook Pro screws, even though they’re fully standard screws.

  • Our solution is less elegant, but just as effective as the first two. The problem is simple: Our notebook computer is a 15" MacBook Pro. Apple doesn’t support replacing the optical drive with a hard disk, and this notebook has only one 2.5" slot. Replace The Optical Drive With A Hard disk Despite this limitation, there is a solution – the OptiBay from MCE. This is a case containing an adapter that lets you connect a hard disk in place of the optical drive. Obviously, since our notebook uses an ATA optical drive, the hard disk has to use the same interface. OptiBays exist for MacBook and MacBook Pro, in two versions – for computers that use a slim optical drive (12.5 mm thick) and for ones that use an ultra-slim (9.5 mm) drive. OptiBays are usable on any computer, but need a few adaptations, including to the tray. The OptiBay costs $99, but you can order it with a hard disk or an external optical drive. Choosing Components: The Hard Disk Once we had the adapter, we needed to choose a hard disk and SSD. For the hard disk, we needed an ATA model with a decent capacity (at least 120 GB). The speed didn’t matter much since the disk would only be used to store data – all our applications will be on the SSD. We chose a Samsung HM160 (5,400 rpm, 160 GB). Note that the most recent 2.5" hard disks are no longer made in ATA and only in SATA format, which limits the capacity (250-GB models exist, but they’re rare). Choosing Components: The SSD The second problem was which SSD to choose. First, it had to be a SATA drive, because the machine’s original hard disk uses that interface. Then, its capacity had to be at least 32 GB so that we could use a recent operating system like Mac OS X Leopard or Windows Vista with no problem and still have all our applications on the SSD. We ended up choosing a 32-GB Mtron MOBI 3000. This fast SSD (the specs claim a 100 MB/s read speed and 80 MB/s write speed) uses a SATA interface and is currently one of most highly reputed SSD models.

  • Innovate or perish: The challenge facing Apple's new Intel iMac and...

    San Francisco (CA) - From this point forward, Apple Computer will have to innovate toward a unique and perhaps unparalleled computing platform, if the company expects Macintosh to remain a competitive force in a rapidly changing consumer computer market. That's the opinion of David Daoud, IDC's research manager for personal computing. "A company that has a 4% market share cannot afford remaining stable from a product line perspective," Daoud told TG Daily this afternoon. "They need to innovate, or otherwise they will simply just disappear." The little remote control, the media player front end, the embedding of the computer in a thin, flat panel behind the widescreen monitor, are all very nice. And the addition of Intel's Core Duo processors are, in Daoud's opinion, a tremendously positive step. Both the new iMac desktop units and the completely new MacBooks "certainly have all the nice features, like Front Row [media player], iSight [built-in camera], but they need to do a little more than that if they really want to gain market share in substantial ways," said Daoud. You can almost hear the Macintosh proponents' outcry: How could today's announcements not be innovative enough? The company has made an unprecedented platform shift from an architecture derived from the Motorola concepts on which the original Mac was built, to a platform that doesn't even count multi-Byte numerals in the same Byte order. The new notebook machines will feature dual-core processors as standard equipment, along with features that have been called "innovative" and "competitive" in the past, like Airport WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity. And today, Apple CEO Steve Jobs announced his company will be completing its transition to all-Intel processors by the end of 2006, as much as half a year ahead of schedule. How can this not be considered innovative? The problem facing Apple is innovating the Macintosh to a degree as substantive and as market-changing as its innovations to the iPod. Consumers interested in new systems are going to be comparing the new Intel-based Macs with the well-established established array of Intel-based PCs, feature for feature. At that point, they're going to discover some very familiar features - half-a-gigabyte of memory, 80 Gb hard drive, ATI Radeon X1800 graphics card, and others - and then compare the new MacBook Pro's entry level price tag with a comparable system from Dell, which Daoud calculated at about $1,400. Add-ons for such a system, like Bluetooth, WiFi, camera, and maybe even a little remote control, could bring the Dell system up to about $1,750. Apple has slimmed down its "Macintosh premium" - the extra price consumers will pay for the right to say they own a Mac - to a gap of perhaps less than $200, assuming that these consumers necessarily want all the MacBook Pro's high-end features. Is this reduced premium enough to convince current or would-be Windows notebook users to make the jump? IDC's Daoud says no. The iMac now comes with Intel's Core Duo dual core processors "I think any analyst out there who expects Apple to duplicate its success from iPod with the computer line, will be very mistaken," Daoud remarked. "The iPod sets the stage for a new industry, a new market. The PC is a very mature, very well established industry, and there are several very gigantic companies out there, and a host of small companies that are extremely innovative." So whereas it is much easier for Apple to define the theatre of operations for the entire portable music market, that authority does not automatically translate into the PC market, where much of the true innovation, some believe, has already taken place. "It's going to be very difficult for a company like Apple, or anyone, to really move market share beyond one or two points. It's just not going to be possible." For Macintosh to gain market share, Daoud pointed out, someone else has to forfeit it. In most markets where market share is captured at the expense of a competitor, one company's innovation directly targets another company's leadership strengths. In the automotive market, for example, Dodge's recent re-introduction of the Challenger design at this week's Detroit Auto Show, and Chevrolet's dabbling in the waters of reinventing the Camaro, both appear to be moves directed at Ford's very successful refresh of the Mustang (one of Ford's few recent successes). In the PC market - even in portable computers - one computer tends to look very much like the next. But this year, that's changing. At CES 2006, the major players in the notebook market - including Toshiba, Samsung, HP, and Sony - indicated they're searching for that breakaway formula that would enable them to carve new market niches for themselves. All four of these manufacturers are dabbling with high-end features, such as high-definition optical discs, WiMAX connectivity, and even Dolby Surround Sound, all of which contribute to a premium price tag. The premium end of the market has typically been Macintosh territory. MacBook Pro doesn't appear to be targeted toward any of these high-end competitors at present. Instead, says Daoud, it's geared toward Apple's base, as well as heavy multimedia users who may already be familiar with - if not enamored with - the Apple brand. So MacBook Pro, he said, "really does not break into a new market. It really is a continuation of a product shift from the previous processors to the new ones, beefing up the system with applications that talk very well to the iPod world. But I really don't think that this is going to duplicate the success that we've seen with iPod, into that computer market." "What you will see [is] a number of innovative products entering the PC market," Daoud continued, "that are really going to be branded as 'media centers' - various forms of PCs in new form factors, that are going to make the market pretty interesting, very diverse, and extremely competitive...Each of the vendors out there right now are introducing very interesting systems, from tablet PCs to media centers to things that can replace your stereo system and television." And ironically, Intel may be doing the most to help out these competitors, through the advent of the Viiv media center PC specification, which embraces the Core Duo specification well enough, but also requires Windows Media Center Edition. "It goes back to a very critical point, which is innovation," IDC's David Daoud told us. What leads Apple to succeed in the portable music market is the fact that iPod has defined the functionality that consumers expect in that market, even from competitors. In the meantime, Apple's new computers "really are nothing else than refreshes. They are good systems, they are strong systems, they have new stuff, but so does everybody else. So it's a field where everybody is on equal footing, as opposed to what Apple did with the iPod, where they pretty much took the leadership role and created that market."

Ads
Ads
All about Notebooks
 Latest Notebooks articles
Asus' G51J: Affordable Core i7 Mobile Gaming?

Asus' G51J: Affordable Core i7 Mobile Gaming?
Mobility and gaming have been at odds for a long time, but Asus thinks its G51J could be the solution. With Intel Core i7 Mobile CPU technology and Nvidia’s recent GeForce GTX-260M, is this mid-sized, mid-priced notebook too good to be true at ~$1,500? Read More

All Notebooks articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

adventure : Ray Adventure game, South Park style. Pick the way the story goes by picking an answer among those offered.
crazy : Interactive Boogy Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
Ads

Sponsored links