Page 1:New HDDs With 500 GB Per Platter (500 GB To 2 TB)
Page 2:Samsung Spinpoint F2 EcoGreen (500 GB)
Page 3: Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 (500 GB, 750 GB, and 1,000 GB)
Page 4:Western Digital Caviar Green WD20EADS (2 TB)
Page 5: Comparison Table and Test Setup
Page 6:Access Time And I/O Performance
Page 8:PCMark Vantage Application Benchmark
Page 9:Power Consumption
Page 10:Noise And Temperature
WD’s WD10EADS remains the lowest-power 3.5” desktop hard drive. The new 2 TB drive requires 5.2 W and, hence, even more power than the 7,200 RPM Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 does due to its higher platter count of four versus two or one for the Seagate drives. It’s interesting to see that a single-platter Barracuda 7200.12 at 7,200 RPM consumes about the same amount of power at idle that the 5,400 RPM two-platter Samsung Spinpoint F2 EcoGreen does.
The power consumption increases at maximum sequential throughput. The low-power drives with few platters are the most efficient. Seagate’s Barracuda 7200.12 at 1 TB requires the most power, but is still not inefficient given its relatively high performance. Other drives require up to 10 W to do the same job.
Full HD Video playback also means sequential throughput, but with a limited data stream.
Workstation-type I/O creates a very different load, which primarily shows that a larger number of platters and heads translate into higher power consumption. However, the single-platter drives actually do not offer significantly lower power results in idle mode.
- New HDDs With 500 GB Per Platter (500 GB To 2 TB)
- Samsung Spinpoint F2 EcoGreen (500 GB)
- Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 (500 GB, 750 GB, and 1,000 GB)
- Western Digital Caviar Green WD20EADS (2 TB)
- Comparison Table and Test Setup
- Access Time And I/O Performance
- PCMark Vantage Application Benchmark
- Power Consumption
- Noise And Temperature