- Iomega REVs Up To 70 GB
- Brando Hooks Up (S)ATA Drives To USB 2.0
- Going the SAS Storage Way
- iSCSI The Open-E Way
- Acard's Small Business RAID Appliance
- Safer 6 for RAID Controllers
- A New RAM Hard Drive from HyperOs
- RAID on Rye
- PCI Express Battles PCI-X
- SATA Spells Trouble for SCSI RAID: Five Controllers Put to the Test
Benchmark Results
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: extreme, compactflash
Syndication:
Benchmark Results




Conclusion
The benchmarks pretty much speak for themselves. Even though there is little difference when writing, the Extreme IV clearly establishes dominance where reading, access, and CPU usage is concerned. This makes it the ideal candidate where large transfers of digital images are concerned. Those of us in the photography world will truly appreciate this, because there isn't always a chance to grab your digital pictures from the card as you snap them. Add to that the fact that it can do it all without taxing the CPU, and it comes out a clear performance winner.
Author's Opinion
Even though the Extreme IV did not quite hit the advertised 40 MB/s mark in my testing, I can forgive this fact in light of its increased speed compared to the competition. The speed, ease of use, and negligible CPU load is likely to be of value to anyone seeking to use the Extreme IV with any regularity or frequency.
Join our discussion on this topic
- Previous page 40 MB/s CompactFlash Cards By SanDisk