Intel Will Fully Update Celeron, Pentium to 32nm
Amid all the talking about the Celeron's future, Intel committed to the entry-level CPU in a conference call earlier this week.
“We will not take [32nm process technology and appropriate micro-architecture] down into the Pentium and Celeron until either late this year or early next year,” said Intel CEO Paul Otellini, quoted by X-bit labs.
Reports from Taiwan originally said that Intel would not be moving the Celeron onto any new CPU architecture, leaving it to phase out when the Core 2 technology is no longer in production.
Intel refuted the report, and the now it seems that the Celeron brand will continue to occupy the value segment right above the Atom.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
-
mavroxur I figured Intel wouldn't drop the Celeron. If anything, possibly a name change or integrate it into another family and give it a different model designation.Reply -
A few 32nm Celerons are already in production, at least according to Intel's website. ( E.g. http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=43523 ) May be OEM only though - I haven't seen them for sale anywhere.Reply
-
AndrewMD The marketing that went into Celeron from an early stage is still effective today with the consumer market looking for value based systems. Not everyone needs an i3, i5 or i7 processor.Reply -
lauxenburg G1101? I swore I saw that on Intel Ark....I could have been high, but I swear I saw a 32nm Celeron...Reply -
wotan31 AndrewMDThe marketing that went into Celeron from an early stage is still effective today with the consumer market looking for value based systems. Not everyone needs an i3, i5 or i7 processor.That's a silly argument, no? The i3 is much slower than a C2D. Heck, the Celeron might even be faster than an i3. Celeron is the answer to a question nobody asked. Let it die.Reply -
chickenhoagie wotan31That's a silly argument, no? The i3 is much slower than a C2D. Heck, the Celeron might even be faster than an i3. Celeron is the answer to a question nobody asked. Let it die.the celeron is nowhere near as fast as an i3. single-core with 512kb of l2 cache? thats not even as fast as old P4's. even if you get a top notch celeron (dual core with 1mb cache), thats still not even as good as ur cheapest core 2 duo. but yes, let the celeron die please. Atoms should be the new cheap-line proc.Reply
Most Popular
By Mark Tyson
By Anton Shilov
By Anton Shilov
By Mark Tyson