NIST warns several of its Internet Time Service servers may be inaccurate due to a power outage — Boulder servers 'no longer have an accurate time reference'

Time waits for no man
(Image credit: Getty Images)

The National Institute of Standards and Technology has warned that several of its Internet Time Service servers could be providing inaccurate time following a failure of the primary atomic time scale, NIST-F4, at its Boulder, Colorado campus. The alert was posted to NIST’s public Internet Time Service mailing list after a prolonged utility power outage disrupted the facility on December 17, with engineers still working to fully restore normal operations several days later.

According to NIST, the Boulder campus lost utility power at approximately 22:23 UTC during a period of high winds that triggered line damage and preemptive shutdowns tied to wildfire risk in the region. While backup systems were expected to maintain continuity, NIST says a critical standby generator failure occurred downstream of the signal distribution chain that feeds its Boulder-based Internet Time Service infrastructure. As a result, the atomic ensemble time scale that underpins those services was interrupted.

NIST F-4 atomic clock in Boulder

(Image credit: National Institute of Standards and Technology)

The NIST-F4 atomic clock at Boulder uses caesium atoms to measure the exact length of a second, which is just a little bit more sophisticated than one you might be able to build on Pi. It's an important point of reference used for many applications like GPS systems, data centers, telecommunications, and power generation — all of which require extremely precise timekeeping. According to NIST, it represents the "gold standard of accuracy" in timekepeing.

The Boulder incident follows another Internet Time Service disruption on December 10 at NIST’s Gaithersburg, Maryland site, where an atomic time source failure caused a time step of approximately minus 10 milliseconds on affected hosts. At the time of writing, NIST has not provided a firm estimate for when full service will be restored at the Boulder campus.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • bit_user
    Yikes! That sounds like they're probably working with antiquated equipment on a shoestring budget. Given how much IT infrastructure depends on it, it really ought to be bomb-proof, with multiple failovers at each point. Stuff like a power gap, when switching to a generator, sounds pretty amateur.

    They say there's geographical redundancy, but how much?
    Reply
  • kanewolf
    bit_user said:
    Yikes! That sounds like they're probably working with antiquated equipment on a shoestring budget. Given how much IT infrastructure depends on it, it really ought to be bomb-proof, with multiple failovers at each point. Stuff like a power gap, when switching to a generator, sounds pretty amateur.

    They say there's geographical redundancy, but how much?
    The current federal administration does not believe in funding basic scientific things like NIST. They probably ARE years past due for recap on something.
    Reply