Asus ROG Strix B650E-E Gaming Wi-Fi Review: More Affordable ROG

ROG Quality and looks, dual PCIe 5.0 M.2 sockets at a comparatively reasonable price

Asus ROG Strix B650E-E Gaming Wi-Fi
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Asus ROG Strix B650E-E Gaming Wi-Fi ($349.99) is a worthwhile option at the top of the B650 stack. Its 12 USB ports, four M.2 sockets (two PCIe 5.0 x4), and high-quality audio solution stand out, while the ROG Strix’s black-with-red accents look blends in well with most build themes.

Pros

  • +

    12 USB ports on Rear IO

  • +

    Two PCIe 5.0 M2 sockets

  • +

    Q-Release and Q-Latch for PCIe/M.2

  • +

    ROG stying

Cons

  • -

    Lacks 40 Gbps ports

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The Asus B650E-E Gaming Wi-Fi is Asus’ flagship motherboard in the B650 lineup, presenting users with a less-expensive yet full-featured option supporting AMD’s 7000 series processors. Priced at $150 less than the X670E-E Gaming Wi-Fi, you still end up with most of the features from its big brother, including multiple PCIe 5.0 M.2 sockets, ample USB count on the rear IO, high-quality audio, capable power delivery, the classic ROG look, and more. For around $350, it’s a solid option for a B650 flagship-class motherboard.

The rest of Asus’ B650 product stack consists of eight boards, from the ROG Strix, Prime and TUF Gaming lines. They also come in all shapes and sizes, including Micro ATX and Mini-ITX options, with prices ranging from $199.99 (Prime B650-M-A AX) to our $349.99 flagship.

Digging into some features, the B650E-E Gaming includes two PCIe 5.0 slots for graphics, two PCIe 5.0 M.2 sockets (four total M.2), PCIe Slot Q-Release, M.2 Q-Latch, and more. The power delivery isn’t the most robust we’ve seen using, 70A MOSFETs, but it does do the job even with our Ryzen 9 7950X. And although it has a lot of USB connectivity on the rear IO, it does lack 40 Gpbs ports (as do most B650 boards). Performance when using our B650E-E Gaming board played out well across our testing suite, ending up average among other tested boards. It does well in some tests, including gaming and the Procyon office tests, and never really struggled outside of the Cinebench multi-threaded result.

Joe Shields
Staff Writer, Components

Joe Shields is a staff writer at Tom’s Hardware. He reviews motherboards and PC components.

  • pug_s
    I thought B650 mothboards would be cheaper. I would expect them be around $100 for the budget range, but I guess I am wrong.
    Reply
  • belgeek
    I would have loved a test of their "PBO Enhancement" feature.
    It's one of the reason that i'm considering their board.
    Reply
  • CeltPC
    belgeek said:
    I would have loved a test of their "PBO Enhancement" feature.
    It's one of the reason that i'm considering their board.
    Tom's used to do quite in-depth MB reviews, they now seem to be cursory. Not only do they skip the PBO enhancement - a very cool and useful feature, but they rate the Auros Master higher, despite the less than desirable PCI-e sharing arrangement of the Gigabyte. Always look to other reviews to get a complete view of things.
    Reply
  • jimbo6262
    Admin said:
    The Asus ROG Strix B650E-E Gaming is a cost-effective, B650 flagship-class motherboard with 12 USB ports on the rear IO, two PCIe 5.0 M.2 sockets, and a solid audio solution for under $350.

    Asus ROG Strix B650E-E Gaming Wi-Fi Review: More Affordable ROG : Read more
    Question, in the manual, says: "When M.2 3 is occupied with an SSD device, PCIEX16 1 will run x8 only." also when PCIEX16_2 is plugged in, it will be PCIEX16_1 running at 8X, PCIEX16_2 will run at 4X and M.2_3 will be 4X ALL GEN5.

    I'm thinking that instead of PCIE 8X 8X, this board will share that 2nd PCIE lane as PCIEX16_2 at 4X and M.2_3 at 4X GEN 5.

    However, the review state that "Last, M.2_3 also sources its lanes from the chipset and runs PCIe 4.0 x4 (64 Gbps) speeds..."

    I'm just confused...
    Reply
  • javorenator
    Asus really outdid themselves putting only a slow third party SATA chip ASM1061. This was not tested in the review and this is not really good. You can only find it in the forums where people complain. Did you guys forget that if now I want to put 4TB or 12TB or even 2TB cheap storage I can easily go for a SATA drive.
    Reply
  • Safetytrousers
    jimbo6262 said:
    Question, in the manual, says: "When M.2 3 is occupied with an SSD device, PCIEX16 1 will run x8 only." also when PCIEX16_2 is plugged in, it will be PCIEX16_1 running at 8X, PCIEX16_2 will run at 4X and M.2_3 will be 4X ALL GEN5.

    I'm thinking that instead of PCIE 8X 8X, this board will share that 2nd PCIE lane as PCIEX16_2 at 4X and M.2_3 at 4X GEN 5.

    However, the review state that "Last, M.2_3 also sources its lanes from the chipset and runs PCIe 4.0 x4 (64 Gbps) speeds..."

    I'm just confused...
    I don't know of any board where you populate the second PCIe slot the 1st slot doesn't drop to x8. It's no surprise that populating the second slot would make those drops if m2.3 is used. But the board gives you those choices (2nd slot or 2nd nvme x5), and the 2 PCIe 4 nvme slots can both be used with no other consequence.
    Reply
  • BarftheMog
    LLC 1 on Asus is the LOWEST LLC setting and 8 (or 4 depending on board) would be the HIGHEST LLC setting allowing the LEAST amount of Vdroop. How can someone at a reputable review site get this so incorrect?
    Reply