Gigabyte B660I Aorus Pro DDR4 Review: Pricey Mini-ITX

An expensive but capable RGB-adorned Mini ITX B660 option.

Gigabyte B660I Aorus Pro DDR4
(Image credit: © Gigabyte)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Priced around $245, the B660I Aorus Pro DDR4 is the most expensive B660 Mini ITX motherboard. Although it covers the basics, looks good and has overbuilt VRMs, competing boards cost less and are better equipped.

Pros

  • +

    Robust 90A VRMs

  • +

    Premium appearance, including RGB LEDs

Cons

  • -

    Highest priced B660 ITX board

  • -

    Only one M.2 socket

  • -

    Dated, mid-range audio codec

  • -

    No Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps) USB ports

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Gigabyte’s B660I Aorus Pro DDR4 aims to be the ITX solution of choice for those looking for a compact B660-chipset baord. But priced at $245.99 as of this writing, it’s the most expensive B660 Mini ITX motherboard available. It’s arguably the best-looking board of the bunch, and it has integrated RGBs, which its competitors lack. But looks and lights aside, Asus’ ROG Strix B660-I Gaming WIFI checks off a few more boxes and costs less.

The B660I Aorus Pro DDR4 implements a surprisingly robust VRM, with 90A MOSFETs, along with four SATA ports, a single M.2 socket, 2.5 GbE and integrated Wi-Fi 6. In all, it’s a competent and complete Mini ITX motherboard, but an expensive one that emphasizes aesthetics over more substantive features.

Joe Shields
Staff Writer, Components

Joe Shields is a staff writer at Tom’s Hardware. He reviews motherboards and PC components.

  • shady28
    Good to see you guys doing more mATX and ITX board reviews.

    One suggestion on motherboard reviews. Test the M.2 performance and one of the higher speed USB 3.2 ports.

    I've noticed on other sites, some motherboards can have much slower real world performance on the M.2 and USB ports than otherwise identically setup boards with the same chipset.

    I believe this is why some of your boards are showing up under performing on the compression tests. The differences in this area can be significant. Example below.

    Reply