System Builder Marathon, Q2 2013: The $400 Spirit Of Mini-ITX
CPU And Cooler
Processor: Intel Pentium G860
As a one-time favorite gaming processor of ours, the Pentium G860 lost some of its favor recently for poor performance in a few heavily-threaded titles. But I have no problem recommending this chip for the right price and purpose. Having just $185 to split between my CPU and graphics card, we’re confident that this 3.0 GHz, dual-core, Sandy Bridge-based Pentium delivers top value, and is perfect for this build.
The G860’s overall appeal is eroded by the slightly cheaper and just-as-fast Ivy Bridge-based Pentium G2020. However, we had no guarantee that our H61 Express motherboard would ship with Ivy Bridge support out of the box. This is a very real concern for real-world users when it comes to pairing older platforms to newer CPUs. And while we have plenty of chips sitting around for the flash, you might not. So, to play this as real-world as possible, we went the Sandy Bridge route. In the end, our board did ship with an Ivy Bridge-enabled BIOS and we could have dropped our out-of-pocket to $388 by choosing a Pentium G2020.
Read Customer Reviews of Intel's Pentium G860
CPU Cooler: Intel Retail Boxed Heat Sink And Fan
Intel’s boxed cooler consists of a low-profile orb-style aluminum heatsink, low-speed PWM-controlled fan, and a push-pin mounting bracket. It is sufficient for the task, and even at full-bore remains fairly quiet. Key to this build, it doesn’t rob funding from other potentially more rewarding parts.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: CPU And Cooler
Prev Page An Inexpensive Console-Sized Gaming PC Next Page Motherboard And Memory-
ingtar33 great article. this type of look at how a low end "budget" build handles modern titles was perfect. Loved it. I think you got about the most you could hope for out of a $400 budget. Frankly i can't find a way to make something better at that price point. spot on really. nicely done.Reply
I do like how most of those games were "playable" on high settings at 1080p with that tiny rig... very cool. -
Crashman Nice build, makes me wonder how it would stack up to my old 4.0 GHz overclocked Core 2 Duo office PC. Which gets gamed on occasionally using its HD 6850 graphics card.Reply -
allanitomwesh FINALLY! I agree this whole system builder was almost a fail.Reply
Also, I can't believe you had a SG05 and didn't build with it,it has an awesome power supply. Again,if you weren't getting a disk drive the V3+ was the smaller, higher quality case than CM 120 ( though they're finished on newegg)
The obsession with ginormous cards in tiny places made your cases not tiny.Clearly,a more sensible build,like with a 670,would fit in a much smaller footprint.
The lack of the FT03 Mini is a fail. It's a Mac killing case,and should've been the go to case for the $2500 build, because at that price,my case better look it.
Otherwise I like that you were at least up to the challenge, and I applaud this last build. -
Crashman
The FT03 Mini would have probably caused the $2500 PC's graphics card to overheat, or caused the graphics card to overheat the CPU. And a 670 might have worked, but then it wouldn't have been a $2500 PC. But please don't let the facts get in the way of your opinion.11047601 said:FINALLY! I agree this whole system builder was almost a fail.
Also, I can't believe you had a SG05 and didn't build with it,it has an awesome power supply. Again,if you weren't getting a disk drive the V3+ was the smaller, higher quality case than CM 120 ( though they're finished on newegg)
The obsession with ginormous cards in tiny places made your cases not tiny.Clearly,a more sensible build,like with a 670,would fit in a much smaller footprint.
The lack of the FT03 Mini is a fail. It's a Mac killing case,and should've been the go to case for the $2500 build, because at that price,my case better look it.
Otherwise I like that you were at least up to the challenge, and I applaud this last build.
You could say that nobody should even bother spending $2500 on an ITX-based system, or that a system with ITX limitations should never be expected to provide top performance. At least those opinions would make more sense than the stuff you said above.
-
brucek2 My favorite of the builds. Feels congruent to me in that budget, form factor and system capabilities all align to each other and to my personal sensibilities. I could see making a system like this for a bedroom or den.Reply -
Crashman
Or even an office! Really. I might not build one of these for a performance competition, but it looks like a solid alternative to my retired-gaming office PC.11047721 said:My favorite of the builds. Feels congruent to me in that budget, form factor and system capabilities all align to each other and to my personal sensibilities. I could see making a system like this for a bedroom or den.
-
CommentariesAnd More PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant / BenchmarksReply
CPU: Intel Pentium G860 3.0GHz Dual-Core Processor ($69.99 @ Newegg)
Motherboard: Foxconn H61S Mini ITX LGA1155 Motherboard ($49.99 @ Amazon)
Memory: Corsair 4GB (1 x 4GB) DDR3-1333 Memory ($29.99 @ NCIX US)
Storage: Samsung Spinpoint M8 500GB 2.5" 5400RPM Internal Hard Drive ($54.99 @ Newegg)
Video Card: Sapphire Radeon HD 7750 1GB Video Card ($99.99 @ Newegg)
Wireless Network Adapter: Rosewill RNX-N180UB 802.11b/g/n USB 2.0 Wi-Fi Adapter ($9.99 @ Newegg)
Case: Rosewill RS-MI-01 BK Mini ITX Tower Case w/250W Power Supply ($49.99 @ Amazon)
Optical Drive: LG GH24NS95 DVD/CD Writer ($17.99 @ Newegg)
Total: $371.92
(Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available.)(Generated by PCPartPicker 2013-06-27 03:06 EDT-0400)
Some improvements I would like to suggest , Maybe I am crazy , but felt I should do this. -
silverblue Even this diminutive little machine would significantly outpace my old Phenom II X3 710, XFX HD 4830 and 4x1GB DDR2-800 (4-4-4-12) for a pretty decent price.Reply