New Remotely Exploitable Vulnerability Found in 64-bit Win7

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • nikorr
    Only on Safari?
    Reply
  • amk-aka-Phantom
    An independent researcher has discovered a remotely exploitable vulnerability in Windows 7 that's linked to Apple's Safari browser.

    Who the hell uses Safari on Windows? :lol: Dismissed!
    Reply
  • alyoshka
    Well, it had to be the best Antivirus in town too.... :)
    Reply
  • mrmaia
    I think this is a move from Apple to screw Microsoft :lol:
    Reply
  • amuffin
    nice try apple but we arent that stupid :non:
    Reply
  • teodoreh
    Safari - ahahahahahahahaha
    Reply
  • molo9000
    The actual vulnerability is in the NtGdiDrawStream function in the win32k.sys.

    Other browsers or programs that call this function might be vulnerable, too.
    Reply
  • JOSHSKORN
    nikorrOnly on Safari?
    So far there's no indication that the three most popular browsers -- Internet Explorer (40.63-percent), Chrome (25.69-percent) and Firefox (25.23-percent) -- share a similar vulnerability when used in Windows 7.
    Reply
  • ichihaifu
    Who the hell actually uses safari in windows? herpaderp.
    Reply
  • JOSHSKORN
    amk-aka-phantomWho the hell uses Safari on Windows? Dismissed!
    As of November 2011, the Safari browser commanded only 5.92-percent of the browser market, so there doesn't seem to be a potential widespread problem.
    Not that many, apparently. I installed it once just to see it, but have since then have had to reformat my computer due to a black screen, which I'm sure is unrelated, considering I never launched Safari since I'd installed and looked at it.
    Reply