IDC: Lack of Start Button Deflates Windows 8 Interest

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • LORD_ORION
    I think I'd be PO'd again if I bought the 3rd party "fixes" only to have MS add them.
    Reply
  • antilycus
    So dumb. If you are going to force change on consumers they will look for alternatives such as linux and mac. Some will pay the rip off prices for MAC some will take the free and open linux and some will stay. Either way yuou are forcing them to make decission whereas previously they didnt need to. Split up yoyr market...yet another great business idea on behalf of MS.
    Reply
  • tadej petric
    Not getting 8. If I can live normaly without ever having vista than its same thing with 8. Worst windows to date
    Reply
  • benji720
    Or they can use Classic Shell which does the same thing and saves you $5.
    Reply
  • tokencode
    Microsoft should have simply detected whether a touch device was present or not. If there is no touch device, default to a standard windows 7 style desktop interface. It's that simple, Microsoft should be following the Hippocratic oath, first do no harm.
    Reply
  • visa
    tadej petricNot getting 8. If I can live normaly without ever having vista than its same thing with 8. Worst windows to dateI think Windows 8 is leaps and bounds better than Vista. I've been using it for months without issues, other than getting used to lack of a start button. I guess you don't remember all the driver and compatibility issues with Vista?

    I do think it is pretty strange that they didn't even think to include an option to enable a start button though. I think most people looking in these forums can work around it without problems but it could be very difficult for the average office worker.
    Reply
  • anxiousinfusion
    "Windows Blue" annual updates later this year, and could possibly place the Start button back where it belongs.

    I'm pinning quite a bit of hope on the Blue update. They need to reorganize the interface into something logical again.
    Reply
  • ubercake
    If they didn't put the Metro interface in there and introduced a desktop that just let you boot to the traditional desktop and gave you a start button, on the surface it wouldn't seem like much of an upgrade.

    We'd all have even less of a reason to upgrade from 7.

    I do like the idea of the integrated environments though between the phone, tablet, PC, Console, etc... But when it comes to the nitty gritty (office documents, programming, normal copy paste operations, multiple windowed environment, etc...), everything is done in the desktop.

    From a purely entertainment standpoint (browsing web, streaming video, social networking, live tiles, online shopping, etc...), the Windows 8 metro interface is sufficient across platforms. Although, the non-metro browser interface for most of the entertainment functions is far more robust. I can't stand shopping on Amazon through the Metro Widget.
    Reply
  • sot010174
    I don't get Microsoft. I'm using 8 on my X202e and It's great. But why force the Windows 8 Metro or whatever if beyond me. OK, let's fix Win8:

    1. Allow the user to select between Win 8 or Win 7 interface mode. Being that Metro is still accessible via an icon.

    Done.

    Reply
  • sot010174
    Windows 8 Fix:

    Allow the user to select between Windows 8 or Windows 7 interface mode. In win7 mode, allow the user to access metro as a program.

    Done.
    Reply