Windows Server 8 to Get a New File System: ReFS

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Douglas Perry
Contributor

Douglas Perry was a freelance writer for Tom's Hardware covering semiconductors, storage technology, quantum computing, and processor power delivery. He has authored several books and is currently an editor for The Oregonian/OregonLive.

  • nforce4max
    Does it support files with names greater than 256 characters long? I often have to rename files (web pages) that I download because their names being outrageously long that some are up to 384 characters long. Web masters should consider article numbers or a web page naming scheme that isn't a directory or a long title and directory -_-

    I wonder how much better win serv 8 is compared to 2003 and 2008 R2.
    Reply
  • hannibal
    Yep. Interesting to see if we see full implementation of this in win8 servicepack or in win9.
    In anyway nice upgrade, that will have greater impact later, when it is properly tested and allowed to use allso in boot sector.
    Reply
  • ajay_vishvanathan
    hope it consumes lower ram and cpu..
    Reply
  • freggo
    "file lengths of up to 32,000 (unicode) characters"

    Uh, am I missing something or is this a typo.
    What is a 'file length' ?
    Do they mean file NAME or Sector size ?
    Reply
  • jcaulley_74
    nforce4maxDoes it support files with names greater than 256 characters long? I often have to rename files (web pages) that I download because their names being outrageously long that some are up to 384 characters long.
    freggoUh, am I missing something or is this a typo.What is a 'file length' ?Do they mean file NAME or Sector size ?
    "path and file (name) lengths of up to 32,000 (unicode) characters"
    Reply
  • jcaulley_74
    Other relevant info from the ReFS blog:

    "Q) Can I boot from ReFS in Windows Server 8?

    No, this is not implemented or supported.

    Q) Can ReFS be used on removable media or drives?

    No, this is not implemented or supported.

    Q) What semantics or features of NTFS are no longer supported on ReFS?

    The NTFS features we have chosen to not support in ReFS are: named streams, object IDs, short names, compression, file level encryption (EFS), user data transactions, sparse, hard-links, extended attributes, and quotas."
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    jcaulley_74Other relevant info from the ReFS blog:"Q) Can I boot from ReFS in Windows Server 8?No, this is not implemented or supported.Q) Can ReFS be used on removable media or drives?No, this is not implemented or supported.Q) What semantics or features of NTFS are no longer supported on ReFS?The NTFS features we have chosen to not support in ReFS are: named streams, object IDs, short names, compression, file level encryption (EFS), user data transactions, sparse, hard-links, extended attributes, and quotas."
    As with any new file system, it takes time to become adopted. NTFS was not fully adopted until late into XPs release, some people were still using FAT32.

    Honestly though it looks interesting. Looks more geared towards servers, as NTFS does what we need for DT but maybe it will incorporate a few things from the now dead WINFS.....
    Reply
  • alxianthelast
    What 'were' some people maddeningly remain on Xp FAT32.
    Reply
  • warezme
    Just curious, how is this done "atomically" , "The checksum update is done atomically..."? Will we be using quantum computing with windows 8?
    Reply
  • ojas
    Looking at the changes they're making going from win 7 to 8...I'm getting a very strong feeling that Win 9 will turn out to be a master of all trades...great for power users, great for gamers, great for consumption devices and great for servers/enterprises...I mean, they'll have some teething troubles with Win 8 as they did with Vista, but they'll refine it in the end.

    Win 9 will hopefully spur Apple into make a better OS too...but i know they'll be happy with a blown up version of a mobile OS so hopefully Mac OS goes extinct...long live Winux! (or Lindows :P )
    Reply