Burnout Paradise: The Ultimate Box, Performance Analysis

Benchmarks: High Details, 8x MSAA

The highest AA setting that most users will select is 8x MSAA. Since 4x MSAA hasn’t proven to be much of a challenge to our tested cards, let’s see if this will drop some more players from the running:

Wow, 8x MSAA doesn’t even faze the GeForce 9600 GT at the 1680x1050 resolution, which is indeed impressive. Let’s move on to 1920x1200:

Surprisingly, the GeForce 9600 GT remains extremely playable at 1920x1200 with 8xMSAA enabled. The minimum frame rate has dropped a bit, but it’s still over 45 FPS and smooth as butter to play. One more time, we’ll crank the resolution up to 2560x1600 and make these cards work for a living:

It turns out that 8x MSAA and 2560x1600 represent the magic combination. Although it has put up a good fight, the GeForce 9600 GT can no longer render a smooth, playable minimum frame rate. The Radeon HD 4830 is in the same boat, showing a good average frame rate but a low minimum. Only the GeForce GTS 250, Radeon HD 4850, and GeForce GTX 260 demonstrate playable performance at this monster resolution and image-quality setting, while the GeForce GTX 260 is still hitting the vsync barrier, suggesting it has more to give.

  • cruiseoveride
    Where is the people's champion? The HD4870?

    I felt the lighting looked a little more natural on the geforce. The colour on the radeon looked better though
    Reply
  • IzzyCraft
    I like the nvidia shadows more makes it less bland look imo a more definitive look which i like.

    I was wonding why no 4870 like above.

    SSAO on :) reminds me of ripping dvd's and messing with sharpness, debanding etc the telephone wire atleast.
    Reply
  • enterco
    Considering how 'hardware friendly' is this game, probably it will be very successful.
    Reply
  • SpadeM
    The first screen shot comparison is quite tricky :) on the first look you might think the geforce does not render the red car at all.
    Reply
  • ufo_warviper
    Nice article so far. I'm still reading the article, but I just wanted to point out that on page 7 of this review, I think the author somehow confused (a couple times) the 4830 with the 4850, and also the GTS 250 with the GTX 260 cards.

    With the resolution increased to 1920x1200, only the Radeon HD 4830 and GeForce GTS 250 barely pass the playable standard with over 30 FPS minimum frame rates.

    Clearly, he meant the other cards here.
    Reply
  • IzzyCraft
    SpadeMThe first screen shot comparison is quite tricky on the first look you might think the geforce does not render the red car at all.A roll over png or jpg would have probably done better then the color restrivie .gif that was used, Shame that IE8 doesn't support APNG like opera and ff does, it would def make the format much more popular.
    Reply
  • chyll2
    I really like the additional benchmark that imitates different number of cores and clocks. It gives us an idea of performance we would get on similar specs with our system.
    Reply
  • linaaslt
    Somehow i missed benches from hd4770 or 4870/4890 and gtx275. but maybe it's because this game doesn't require good GPU to be playable.
    Reply
  • zehpavora
    I think that, if you want to play this game with 8x MSAA, 8x AA, and High settings, a GTX 275 SLI will work. This game must be amazing at those settings! I like Race Games too, but NSF also lost me on Pro Street. I hope Burnout delivers what EA couldn't...
    Reply
  • DjEaZy
    Phenom 940 @ 3400 HD4870 core@790 GRAM512Mb@4400Mhz
    2x2GB 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
    this all on 22"@1680x1050 all fx crankt up...
    50~100fps
    Reply