ATI Radeon HD 4770 Info Leaked

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • Good I can't wait for the prices to drop even more so I could afford to do sli with my 9800gt 1gb.
    Reply
  • LATTEH
    the card sounds good but i wonder if it will be able to do DX11 when it comes out XD
    Reply
  • 40 fps is fluid!
    Anything below 20-25 becomes laggy and unplayable.
    I'm sure you won't even notice the extra fps, but as a former ati fan, I can be happy to know it still holds the crown!
    Reply
  • hannibal
    Well now $99 is really coming the new middle range cards price segment. Let's hope that allso entry level $35-50 will see some speed up. Because it's those cards that define the main game development because they are the most selled cards around (after integrated graphics of course...)
    Reply
  • solymnar
    Seems nice. The proof of course is always in the benchmarks (and finding out how much headroom it has as a new 40nm part).

    Also have to wonder how hot and loud it runs since it advertises more performance per watt and is on a smaller process while still having a double slot cooling mech.

    Either way filling in brackets and increasing competitive pressure is usually a win for us consumers. :)
    Reply
  • hellwig
    Why don't GPU's follow CPU scaling? CPUs went from 65-45nm, but GPUs went from 65-55-40nm? Wouldn't it make sense (especially since AMD/GlobalFoundry produces both CPUs and GPUs) to use the same process?
    Reply
  • eklipz330
    i know the article ceases to mention this, but this is a replacement for the 4830, and you would think the 4830 is better than the 4770, but they're about the same..4770 might be a little better cause of the gddr5

    i think ati is learning naming schemes from nvidia =
    Reply
  • sublifer
    eklipz330i know the article ceases to mention this, but this is a replacement for the 4830, and you would think the 4830 is better than the 4770, but they're about the same..4770 might be a little better cause of the gddr5i think ati is learning naming schemes from nvidia =From what I hear they're retiring the 4830 and at least they went backwards on the numbering... shouldn't be many confused souls out there trying to upgrade from a 4830 to a 4770 (which may or may not be an upgrade) I'd rather this than they rebadge a 3870 as a 4820 or whatever (That'd be closer to what nvidia has been doing)
    Reply
  • Mucke
    DX10.1 vs DX10
    Reply
  • eklipz330
    ct16151. it looks like a linear move from the 4830, not a real upgrade (although both are excellent cards)2. does anyone really care about DX10.0 with DX 11 around the corner?
    1. yes, its supposed to be linear, but with a lesser power requirement i think

    2. i don't think dx11 will catch on as fast as people think...maybe one or two games to set the bar, but it really has to be something to overtake dx9, which dx10 cudn't do
    Reply