Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $349.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad... | $194.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i7 Extreme Edition I7-975 Quad... | $1041.17 CostCentral.com More info |
|
Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Quad... | $182.99 Directron More info |
Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: November '09
Welcome to another edition of our Best Gaming CPUs for the Money. This month we have a handful of AMD-based processor introductions to factor into our recommendations. Moreover, Intel's Core i5-750 finds itself back on the list for new system builders. Read More
-
Tuning Cool'n'Quiet: Maximize Power And Performance, Part 2
In Part 1, we showed you how to optimize the settings of your Cool'n'Quiet-equipped processor and what sort of power benefits you could expect as a result. Now it's time to run the benchmarks and see how our optimized settings actually perform. Read More
-
Tuning Cool'n'Quiet: Maximize Power And Performance, Part 1
Think your Athlon or Phenom processor is already tuned to deliver the best balance between performance and power consumption? Think again. We show you how to tweak Cool'n'Quiet for even more aggressive speed at maximum efficiency using several AMD CPUs. Read More
Partners
The Games selection
action :
Yoyo the Star
Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
|
crazy :
Xiao Xiao 7
A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
|
Sponsored links
Possible Core i3, i5, i7 Prices Leaked
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (30) |
- Share
Could these be the prices?
Curious as to how much the next-generation of Intel processors is going to run you? Hexus claims to have received from China a pricing list for the upcoming CPUs of the Core i3, i5 and i7 families.
| Model | Cores/ Threads | Clock (GHz) | Cache (MB) | Socket (LGA) | Price ($) |
| Core i7-975 | 4/8 | 3.33 | 8 | 1366 | 970 |
| Core i7-960 | 4/8 | 3.20 | 8 | 1366 | 545 |
| Core i7-950 | 4/8 | 3.06 | 8 | 1366 | 545 |
| Core i7-920 | 4/8 | 2.66 | 8 | 1366 | 275 |
| Core i7-870 | 4/8 | 2.93 | 8 | 1156 | 545 |
| Core i7-860 | 4/8 | 2.80 | 8 | 1156 | 275 |
| Core i5-750 | 4/4 | 2.66 | 4 | 1156 | 192 |
| Core i5-670* | 2/4 | 3.46 | 4 | 1156 | 275 |
| Core i5-661 | 2/4 | 3.33 | 4 | 1156 | 192 |
| Core i5-660* | 2/4 | 3.33 | 4 | 1156 | 192 |
| Core i5-650* | 2/4 | 3.20 | 4 | 1156 | 172 |
| Core i3-540 | 2/4 | 3.06 | 4 | 1156 | 139 |
| Core i3-530 | 2/4 | 2.93 | 4 | 1156 | 119 |
Click here to read the full chart on Hexus.
While the prices are far from confirmed until Intel updates its pricing list, some have reported seeing the Core i5-750 listed at Fry's Electronics for $205, which comes close to the prices listed above.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
- Core I9 Gulftown Benchmarks [CPU & Components]
- AMD Beats the Street; Reports 128 Million Dollar Loss for Q3 2009 [CPU & Components]
- CPU & GPU - should be hybrided or continue??? [CPU & Components]
- General discussion AMD vs Intel, LGA775, Nehalem, etc [CPU & Components]
- Upgrading to Core i7 Extreme [CPU & Components]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- I5 vs i7 Feeling ripped off?
- Why is Core i7 920 better than Phenom 2 955
- core i7 for laptops?
- What computers did you own in the old days? Share your story!
- AMD vs. Intel: Battery Life Investigated
- HOWTO: Overclock C2Q (Quads) and C2D (Duals) - Guide v1.6.1
- My CPU cooler is dying - suggestions welcome for replacement.
- Q6600 or Phenom 9950 BE
- Question about Q6600 and overclocking and really I need your answers..
- Shafted by BestBuy! I NEED ADVICE
- Gateway FX 6800-01e BIOS Update from Gateway Unsupported
- LGA 1366 VS LGA 1155 VS LGA 1156 VS LGA 1567!!!
- "BIOSTAR TPOWER I55 - Intel LGA1156" ROCK
- ASUS M2N SLI Delux
Related articles
-
A Brief Interlude: Phenom II Versus Core i5
Before we dig into the complete Phenom II X4 965 BE review, let's look at our approximated Core i5 comparison: We’re used to seeing big bandwidth numbers from Core i7’s integrated memory controller and triple-channel DDR3 configurations. Pull one 64-bit channel out of contention and you’re still going to see significant throughput. In both test cases here, we’re looking at memory bandwidth using 4 GB (2 x 2 GB) DDR3-1333 at 7-7-7. This represents a worst-case scenario for Core i5, since iTunes is not threaded. Normally, the chip would surge to 3.2 GHz in a situation like this one, with a single core active. Instead, it earns its win at 2.8 GHz—the best our Core i7-920 could muster. Heavily optimized for threading, WinRAR is perhaps more demonstrative of how a Core i5 might perform in a situation with all four cores simultaneously taxed. The gain is, not surprisingly, more significant. In both DivX and Xvid encoding, performance between the Core i5-750 and Phenom II X4 965 is close. DivX is able to take advantage of multiple cores, so its result isn’t expected to change much when Core i5 actually starts shipping. Xvid only hits 25% utilization on a quad-core platform, though, so there’s a fair chance that extra Turbo-induced frequency will give Intel’s offering a larger lead. We only ran a handful of benchmarks here. These numbers are simulated, after all. Also, this is an AMD Phenom II review, and what matters most is how the Phenom II X4 965 fares against its competition today. Even still, we think it’s important to be cognizant of what’s coming, so if you want to draw your own comparisons between today’s AMD launch and Intel’s planned roadmap, bear in mind that Core i5 loses one memory channel and Hyper-Threading, but gains significant one- and two-core performance thanks to a beefed-up Turbo feature. Depending on the application, that should let you derive your own expectations of Core i7-920 and Core i5-750, both with 2.66 GHz stock clocks. See more products Intel Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core... Dell Home $349.99 TheSource $279.50 EagleDirectUSA $305.22 Apogee Source $305.25 Compuvest $307.83
-
Conclusion
The benchmarks make it clear that our initial assessment was right-on: the Phenom II X4 965 BE is an incremental update to a strong mid- to upper-range processor family. An extra 200 MHz for the same $245 sweetens AMD’s platform story, which is already strong (and looking to get better, once ATI unveils its upcoming next-generation graphics cards). We only saw one real issue here. Priced at $245, the Phenom II X4 965 BE is smack dab between Intel’s Core 2 Quad Q9550 ($219) and Core i7-920 ($279). We’d actually recommend against the fastest Core 2 Quad Q9650, which runs at 3 GHz, but costs $320. AMD knows the performance of its flagship sticks it between some tough competition. The i7-920 is routinely faster, while the Core 2 Quad and Phenom II trade blows in our benchmark suite. In order to get a little scrappier with Core 2 Quad, AMD is planning processor/motherboard bundles with several online vendors at launch, including Newegg, TigerDirect, ZipZoomFly, NCIX, and Mwave. Buying a bundle is expected to take prices on both components down a combined $40 or so. We’ll update this page with links to Newegg when the official launch hits, verifying the total savings of these bundles. Update: It has been less than two hours since the Phenom II X4 965 officially launched, and it looks like Newegg has already posted more than a page of different bundle deals on the CPU, ranging from operating systems to motherboards to graphics cards. The best deal isn't quite as aggressive as AMD alluded: the 965 plus Asus' M4A79T Deluxe motherboard for $412, a $25 discount. For more of Newegg's bundles, click this product link, then click 'view all' under the combo deals. Hit It, Or Hold Up? The Phenom II X4 965 BE is a capable performer able to drop into very affordable Socket AM3 motherboards and deliver exceptional value in almost any discipline. At any other time, that’d be cause for recommendation. We’re less than a month away from Intel’s LGA 1156 Core i5/i7 launch, though, and AMD’s willingness to discount CPUs and motherboards is perhaps indicative of the potential impact the new platform might have. AMD wants to sell as many processors as it can between now and then—before competitive pressure compels it to possibly engage in a pricing battle. If you’re faithful to AMD hardware, today’s launch makes for a great opportunity to pick up a processor and motherboard at a discounted price. Given its performance versus Intel’s Core 2 Quad and complementary low-priced platforms, we certainly see no fault in the latest Phenom II X4 flagship. Otherwise, our simulated Core i5 tests suggest that careful comparison shoppers would be better served waiting a few weeks to see if retail Core i5s can really stand up against Core 2 Quad/Phenom II processors at lower price points. Thus far, all signs point to “yes, yes it can.”
-
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Review
There is nothing wrong with an incremental update—especially an update that adds performance without affecting pricing. Such is the case with AMD’s new Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition, which arrived at our performance lab running at 3.4 GHz—200 MHz faster than its predecessor, the Phenom II X4 955 BE. Everything else is exactly the same as the Phenom II X4 955, reviewed back in April 2009. So, if the latest Phenom II is predictably faster than AMD’s former flagship, why is today’s launch so significant? In short, it comes just a few weeks ahead of Intel’s upcoming LGA 1156-based P55 platform debut—an event that’ll almost certainly play a bigger role in the adoption of Nehalem-based machines than either the LGA 1366 Core i7 or Xeon 5500-series CPUs have thus far. After all, LGA 1156 is going to be the interface that purportedly makes Intel’s latest architecture accessible to the mainstream, supplanting the Core 2 family at a number of affordable price points. No doubt, those new Core i5/i7 CPUs will be faster than the Core 2 Quads they replace, and at competitive prices. Just when AMD looked like it had achieved performance parity with the top end of Intel’s Core micro-architecture, LGA 1156-based platforms seem almost certain to set the bar higher. Thus, today’s Phenom II X4 965 BE introduction is actually a fairly important one for AMD. On one hand, it could earn the company its mainstream performance crown—at least for a few weeks. On the other, it could be the last time Phenom II looks as competitive as it does now. Of course, that’s going to depend mightily on how the upcoming Intel chips perform. Up Against Core i5 Of course, we’re not able to publish performance numbers with the pre-production Core i5 processors currently running in the lab, so it’s hard to officially quantify how Phenom II will size up. But we can make best guesses using today’s Core i7s as rough test subjects. You’ll find all of our usual benchmarks on the pages that follow. First, however, we wanted to set up Phenom II X4 965 BE against a hypothetical Core i5-750—a processor expected to cost less than $200 when it launches. We simulated the 2.66 GHz offering with a Core i7-920, which runs at the same clock rate. Of course, we had to pull out a single channel of memory (yielding two channels of DDR3-1333) and disable Hyper-Threading, since Core i5 won’t have that feature. The one variable we couldn’t reproduce was Core i5’s enhanced Turbo Boost, which is expected to accelerate clocks to 3.2 GHz when a single core is active. Core i7-920 only benefits from a single bin of Turbo Boost, yielding 2.8 GHz instead. The only other platform capability setting LGA 1156 apart from LGA 1366 is the use of on-die PCI Express 2.0, which we’ve tested extensively and can say that, in single-card configurations, has almost zero impact on performance versus the X58’s chipset-based connectivity. See more products AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black... Directron $209.99 ElectronicsPLUS $243.19 CDW.com $319.99







the processor prices are not the problem, getting an i7 920 D0 for $200 at microcenter has been around for months. It is the motherboard prices that have people interested. P55 in particular
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but under cores/threads... i am assuming like for the core i3 530, it says 2/4 ... so this would be 2 physical cores then 2 hyper-threaded cores?
The i3 530 and 540 are not bad prices... i will admit i've always bought AMD... but if my question above is correct, then essentially we are seeing a "quad" core for 120 bucks.. Phenom2 x2's and the Athlon2 x2's are going to be put on the spot by these guys....hard.
Interesting, I thought the 2.66GHz Lynfield chip was going to release with 8 threads, and have i7 branding.. but perhaps Intel didn't want to cannibalize i7 920 sales with a similar performing cheaper chip. I guess this forces me into selecting a Core i7-860 if these numbers are accurate.
i7-860 and i5-750 with 3 steps Turbo look good.
Bleh, nevermind. My memory was just bad... I dug up Anand's article again, and I just had it wrong. Anand had simply run some benches at 2.66GHz HT Enabled with a test sample, and I forgot the 2.66GHz chip would NOT come w/ HT.
I'm still excited about how the i7-860 setups will compare to i7-920 machines... and if the i7-920 will be released with a more aggressive turbo stepping.
the processor prices are not the problem, getting an i7 920 D0 for $200 at microcenter has been around for months. It is the motherboard prices that have people interested. P55 in particular
Agreed. Even DDR3 RAM prices have dropped significantly, but X58 boards haven't dropped much.
Oh crap not another socket, 1156. My Q9650 and GTX 285 has plenty of years of gaming left in it. This is especially true since of late game developers have been porting their games from the kiddie consoles instead of setting new PC standards. Crysis 2 will be less taxing than the first one was. Look at the new Wolfenstein game to be released in a week or so.
Maybe Carmack's Tech 5 engine and Doom 4 (Yes id has said there is a Doom 4 that will be made) will give us PC gamers some new standards.
I am looking forward to Dragon Age from Bioware, EA Games can still kiss my arse.
I'll wait until Intel releases 8 cores. The I'll get DDR 3 or whatever the new RAM is at the time and of course I'll need a new MB.... That is.. unless AMD pulls out a CPU that is more impressive. OR so cheap I can't refuse. But they way they've been lately... I doubt it.
BTW, is it me or does it feel like that Intel is trying to give AMD breathing room in the below $200/190 market and especially in the sub-$120 market. Intel is not competing with AMD’s PII X3/X2 and Athlon II X2s.
I think Intel is trying to keep AMD limping along just so there is another player in the market.
I'll wait until Intel releases 8 cores. The I'll get DDR 3 or whatever the new RAM is at the time and of course I'll need a new MB....
i9 is going to be 32nm 6 cores with 12mb L3 cache and supports X58 LGA1366 boards. Rumored release date is Q1 2010.
I suppose i9 is finally going to be twice as fast as my Q6600; the minimum requirement for me to upgrade.
How are the 661 and the 660 different? What do the asterisks (*) mean?
Kithzaru: No, it's not like getting a quad, hyperthreading is a big gimmick, it rarely gives more than a 10% performance increase, and sometimes it gives a 10-20% performance decrease. Unfortunately, some under-educated consumers actually fall for it. Hyperthreading has been around for a while, if AMD actually wanted to do it, they could've easily done it by now, but I'm glad they haven't.
the core i-3 is for nbs???
the processor prices are not the problem, getting an i7 920 D0 for $200 at microcenter has been around for months. It is the motherboard prices that have people interested. P55 in particular
I don't even see microcenter listing the 920.
Man those are expensive....

We'll have to see how AMD responds.
I'm hoping to get an i7-860 or something similar in performance next March for ~$175. I think it's possible
I don't even see microcenter listing the 920.
they are not online orderable, in store only
BTW, is it me or does it feel like that Intel is trying to give AMD breathing room in the below $200/190 market and especially in the sub-$120 market. Intel is not competing with AMD’s PII X3/X2 and Athlon II X2s.I think Intel is trying to keep AMD limping along just so there is another player in the market.
Oh course they are... AMD going under is Intel's worst nightmare. The courts would break Intel up into so many pieces if that ever happened, as Intel would then be considered a monopoly. Intel needs AMD to be in the market... and vice-versa, AMD needs Intel as well. Granted, of course AMD wants more market share then they have now, but both these companies need each other.. until a viable third CPU maker come into the market. Then its gloves off
@Kithzaru: Yes, the 2/4 means 2 physical cores each with HT enabled so that an OS can have 4 cores to utilize. In fact, its only the i5-750 that does not have HT.
I am waiting too, I am looking for an Core 8/16. No upgrades until then
i9 is going to be 32nm 6 cores with 12mb L3 cache and supports X58 LGA1366 boards. Rumored release date is Q1 2010.I suppose i9 is finally going to be twice as fast as my Q6600; the minimum requirement for me to upgrade.
I am in EXACTLY the same situation. Only upgrade to double the power. Other option is to go for two opteron 6 core chips on one board.
I gotta wait for reviews but something tells me that i7 860 and i5 660 will sell like water with rebate on the desert...
Kithzaru: No, it's not like getting a quad, hyperthreading is a big gimmick, it rarely gives more than a 10% performance increase, and sometimes it gives a 10-20% performance decrease. Unfortunately, some under-educated consumers actually fall for it. Hyperthreading has been around for a while, if AMD actually wanted to do it, they could've easily done it by now, but I'm glad they haven't.
Actually, the implementation with the i7 basically never gives a performance decrease, and can give up to a 20% boost with basically no increase in TDP or die area. Look at it like a free 20% boost on highly threaded workloads rather than like a quad.
I believe the asterisks (*) mean those CPU's will have integrated graphics.
According to the source of this article (Hexus), the asterisk is an indication of a release date of 1Q10 rather than the earlier 9/6/09 for all the rest of the chips
Sigh.... Confusing model numbers and socket versions.... get an i5, no upgrade to i9... some i7 CPUs work on i5/i3 motherboards - so.... ugh what a bloody mess.
AMD Socket AM3 CPUS is all they are making now... and they work on DDR3 or DDR2 motherboards.
"All the new processors look like they'll be launched on the 6th September, with the exception of those with an asterisk, which are expected in Q1 2010."
This explains the asterisk, But can anyone clarify this for me? :
"The Intel Core i3s are probably Clarkdales without integrated graphics too, meaning that both Clarkdale and Lynnfield will span two naming families."
Integrated Graphics?! Is Intel going to introduce a "Fusion" alternative?
the processor prices are not the problem, getting an i7 920 D0 for $200 at microcenter has been around for months. It is the motherboard prices that have people interested. P55 in particular
Glad microcenters are all over the place. All 22 of them.
can anyone tell me if the core i3 works on lga 775, because on some websites it says it works on lga 775 with p45, g43 etc.... chipsets
can anyone tell me if the core i3 works on lga 775, because on some websites it says it works on lga 775 with p45, g43 etc.... chipsets
Definitely not, the i3 is a different architecture. Intel is releasing the low cost "1156" socket set. From what I'm hearing a new mobo will set you back about US$130 which isn't horrible considering the 1366 offerings.
I wonder what you can get the i5-670 to on air... o.O. I must know!!