Intel to Ship Value-Based X25-X SSD in Q4
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (50) |
- Share
Intel said that it's shipping a value-priced SSD, the X25-X, before the end of the year.
An Intel partner recently informed us that Intel has an upcoming value SSD called the X25-X, which will be based on 34nm Flash memory, thus providing consumers a lower pricetag and competitive performance.
The SSD will fall short in both price and speed in comparison to Intel's X25-M series, which offers 250 MB/sec. read speeds, and 70 MB/sec. write speeds. Intel's other SSD, the X25-E, provides 250 MB/sec. read speeds and 170 MB/sec. write speeds, and costs a rather pretty penny.
According to specs revealed to us, the value SSD will provide reading speeds of up to 170 MB/sec. and write speeds of up to 40 MB/sec. The drive is poised to be priced under $160.
The X25-X should ship sometime before the end of the year, and will arrive as a 2.5-inch MLC drive with an earnest 40 GB capacity.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
Sponsored links
Related articles
-
System Builder Marathon, Sept. '09: AMD System Value Compared
System Builder Marathon, September 2009: The Articles Here are links to each of the four articles in this month’s System Builder Marathon (we’ll update them as each story is published). And remember, these systems are all being given away at the end of the marathon. Keep an eye on this space; this is where we'll post the link to enter the contest for all three systems once the series concludes! Day 1: The $650 Gaming PCDay 2: The $1,250 Enthusiast PCDay 3: The $2,500 Performance PCDay 4: Performance and Value Dissected Introduction We answered overwhelming requests to use AMD in our latest System Builder Marathon and found the excellent gaming, good prices, and mediocre overclocking our previous component reviews had lead us to expect. Value seekers should be especially pleased with our processor selection while criticizing a few of the “unnecessary expenses” in our highest-priced build. Yet supposedly-superfluous features aren’t the most surprising differences in today’s comparison: Let’s also reconsider a few of the performance-oriented component choices. September SBM PC Component Prices$650-Limit Build$1,250-Limit Build$2,500-Limit BuildMotherboardGigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P MSI 790FX-GD70MSI 790FX-GD70ProcessorAMD Phenom II X2 550 BE 3.1 GHz Dual-CoreAMD Phenom II X4 945 3 GHz Quad-Core AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz Quad-CoreMemoryOCZ Gold OCZ2G10664GK 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR2-1066Patriot PVS34G1333LLKN 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR3-13332 x Crucial CT2KIT25664BA1339 8GB (4 x 2GB) DDR3-1333Graphics2 x Sapphire 100245HDMI Radeon HD 4850 512MB4 x Gigabyte GV-R485OC-1GH Radeon HD 4850 1GB3 x MSI R4890-T2D1G OC Radeon HD 4890 1GBOS/Program DrivesWD Blue WD5000AAKS 500GB, 7200 RPMWD Black WD6401AALS 640GB, 7200 RPM2 x Intel X25-M 80GB Model SSDSA2MH080G1 (RAID 0)Storage Hard Drives2 x WD Black 1TB 7200 RPM Model WD1001FALS (RAID 1)OpticalSamsung SATA DVD±RW Model SH-S223B (22x)Optiarc 24X SATA DVD±RW Model AD-7240S-0BDVD/CDLG SATA BD-RE/HD-DVD Model GGW-H20L (6x BD-R)CaseRosewill Wind RyderNZXT TempestNZXT PanzerboxPowerAntec EarthWatts EA650 650WPC Power & Cooling S75CF 750WCorsair CMPSU-1000HX 1000WCPU CoolerAMD Boxed HeatsinkXigmatek HDT-S1283Swiftech H20-220Component CoolingAntec 0761345-75018-9 "SpotCool" LED FanSSD TraySNT SNT-SATA2221B Hot-Swappable BackplaneBay AdapterVantec MRK-250FDTotal Cost $647 $1,265 $2,490 The cheapest build in today’s lineup is a lean, mean gaming machine, fitting two Radeon HD 4850 graphics cards and a high-speed dual-core processor into a sub-$650 package. At the other end of the scale, the high-end build takes an “everything but the kitchen sink” approach, adding liquid cooling and SSD drives to fill reader demands, plus redundant traditional drives to fill the storage demands of high-end buyers. The $1,265 machine attempts to trump the highest-priced build with a total of four graphics cards, sacrificing storage redundancy to fit these within its budget. But with only 512MB per graphics card, will the cheapest system be powerful enough to provide the best gaming value? Will the middle-priced system’s four mainstream-performance graphics cards really be able to overtake the triple-threat high-end cards of its expensive competitor? And for the high-end system, is there really any good reason for gamers to spend this much on drives and cooling? Let’s find out.
-
System Builder Marathon, Sept. '09: $2,500 Performance PC
System Builder Marathon, September 2009: The Articles Here are links to each of the four articles in this month’s System Builder Marathon (we’ll update them as each story is published). And remember, these systems are all being given away at the end of the marathon. Keep an eye on this space; this is where we'll post the link to enter the contest for all three systems once the series concludes! Day 1: The $650 Gaming PCDay 2: The $1,250 Enthusiast PCDay 3: The $2,500 Performance PCDay 4: Performance and Value Dissected Introduction One thing sorely lacking from our System Builder Marathon (SBM) articles has been AMD, and that's not because we don’t like the green team. Putting most of our focus into overall system performance caused us to overlook some of the excellent value AMD offers almost exclusively in the gaming market. Thus, we’ve added a couple of titles for our game benchmark tests where AMD really shines. But AMD’s competitive prices don’t extend only to gaming processors and graphics, as the company also has a thriving chipset business. You certainly won’t find a northbridge with 42 PCI Express (PCIe) lanes from Intel, and otherwise similarly-equipped X58 motherboards come with an approximate $100 price premium. $2,500 Portable Performance PC Component PricesMotherboardMSI 790FX-GD70 Socket AM3Chipset: AMD 790FX/SB750$168ProcessorAMD Phenom II X4 955Four Cores, 3.2 GHz, 8MB Cache$200Graphics3 x MSI R4890-T2D1G OC (CrossFireX)1GB GDDR5-3996 Per CardRadeon HD 4890 GPU at 880 MHz$600DRAM8GB Crucial DDR3-1333 CAS 92 x P/N CT2KIT25664BA1339 Kit$142OS/Program Drives2 x Intel X25-M SSDSA2MH080G1 (RAID 0) 80GB per drive, MLC, 160GB total$460Storage Hard Drives 2 x WD Caviar Black WD1001FALS (RAID 1) 1TB, 7,200 RPM, 32MB Cache SATA 3.0 Gb/s$190OpticalLG GGW-H20L BD-RE / HD-DVD ROM 6x BD-R, 2x BD-RE, 16x DVD±R$180CaseNZXT Panzerbox ATX Mid-Tower$120PowerCorsair CMPSU-1000HX Modular 1,000W ATX12V 2.2, EPS12V 2.91, 80-Plus Certified$240CPU CoolerSwiftech H20-220 2 x 120mm Liquid-Cooling Kit$140Component CoolingAntec 0761345-75018-9 "SpotCool" LED Fan$15SSD TraySNT SNT-SATA2221B Hot-Swappable Backplane$22Bay AdapterVantec MRK-250FD 3.5" to 5.25" adapter$13Total Cost$2,490 We were even able to put the money saved on the motherboard (as well as a few other areas) into storage, adding two 80GB Intel X25-M solid-state disk (SSD) drives for super-fast load times and upgrading the optical unit from a Blu-ray reader to a BD-RE writer, all in an effort to satisfy a multitude of reader requests. Let’s take a closer look at how it all went together.
-
System Builder Marathon: The $5,000 Extreme PC
System Builder Marathon, February 2009: The Articles Here are links to each of the four articles in this month’s System Builder Marathon (we’ll update them as each story is published). Day 1: The $625 Gaming PC Day 2: The $1,250 Mid-Range PC Day 3: The $5,000 Enthusiast PC Day 4: Performance and Value Dissected Introduction The only people who can truly understand the logic behind spending a month’s pay on a computer are those who have actually used such a system. Everyone else seems to think such behavior is silly. Up-and-coming enthusiasts aspire to acquire this level of performance and capability in a gaming machine without spending as much, while ordinary performance fanatics pretend not to care. Then again, stereotypes concerning “overcompensation” were invented out of envy and are projected by those who are afraid to admit that they too would love to own such a machine. Last month we scaled back our highest-end system to $2,500, opening the configuration to a far larger market that typifies the budget of high-end do-it-yourselfers. But while the $2,500 market is dear to us and certainly worth revisiting, a number of readers wanted to see what kind of dream system we could build if given twice the budget. Rather than choose the entire configuration ourselves, we used your recommendations as guidelines to narrow our choice of parts. $5,000 Extreme Performance System ComponentsComponentModelPrice (USD)CPUIntel Core i7 Extreme 965$1,010 CPU CoolerCooler Master Aquagate Max$230 Radiator UpgradeSwiftech MCR320-QP Quiet Power$50 Fan Upgrade3x Scythe S-FLEX SFF21F 120 mm 1,600 RPM$47 Water Block UpgradeSwiftech Apogee GTZ with LGA-1366 Bracket$75 MotherboardAsus Rampage II Extreme$400 RAMMushkin 998679 DDR3-1600 6.0 GB Kit$205 Graphics2x MSI N295GTX-M2D1792 GeForce GTX 295 $1,000 System Hard Drives2x Intel X25-M 80GB SATA Solid State Disk$800 2.5" Hard Drive AdapterSYBA Mobile Rack for 2.5" SATA (2 drives)$36 Storage Hard DriveSeagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5 TB SATA 3.0 Gb/s$130 SoundAsus SupremeFX X-Fi Audio Riser Card0NetworkIntegrated Gigabit Networking0CaseCooler Master Cosmos-S RC-1100$200 PowerCooler Master Real Power Pro RS-850-EMBA$180 OpticalLG Blu-ray Burner/HD DVD-ROM GGW-H20LK$200 Total Price$4,563 Several readers requested a switch to solid-state disk (SSD) drives, so we included them. Other suggestions, such as a hardware RAID controller card, were swiftly dismissed after the drives we chose consumed the budget. The budget eased when prices dropped after our order was placed, but that’s par for the course in the component market. We even bought a sound card, only to have it priced out of our configuration before we started testing, with later price drops occurring only after the tests were complete. We have a few more surprises to discuss, so feel free to follow along as we detail the assembly, tuning, and testing of today’s super-high-end system.
Best offers
|
X25-V 40GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (SATA) | $129.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Portable External 640GB 2.5" Hard... | $99.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Caviar Black 1TB Hard Drive (Serial... | $115.00 STAPLES More info |
|
eGo Desktop External 1TB Hard Drive... | $124.00 CDW.com More info |
|
Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB Hard Drive... | $99.99 Dell Small Business More info |
Q&A: Tom's Hardware And Kingston On SSD Technology
Now waist-deep in the SSD game, Kingston has a lot of know-how and industry insight on all things memory-related. We sat down with two of the company's insiders for a different perspective on some of today’s biggest SSD questions. Read More
-
Upgrading Your Notebook Hard Drive: Does It Make Sense?
Ever wonder what would happen if you replaced an old 7,200 RPM notebook drive with a brand new one? We run a current-generation drive against a two generation-old disk to measure the potential performance and battery life gains you might expect. Read More
-
Super Talent's 512GB RAIDDrive: RAID On An Add-In Card
Super Talent takes advantage of a powerful Areca RAID controller and four flash SSDs to deliver next-generation storage performance from a PCI Express add-in card. We got out hands on the 512GB RAIDDrive, which, you'll be happy to know, is bootable. Read More
All performance charts
- Super Talent, Toshiba Team Up to Make SSD
- mSATA Introduced for Netbook SSDs
- Seagate First With SATA 6Gb/sec. 2 TB Drive









4 bucks a gig. no thanks!
I saw under 160 bucks and got excited... then saw 40GB's. Doesnt seem any cheaper to me.
What the guys up there said.
Write speeds aren't much chop.
wow 40mb/s read, no thanks
With that write speed, I'd still much rather go with a VelociRaptor.
With that write speed, I'd still much rather go with a VelociRaptor.
The small random reads will still far exceed the Velociraptor though. For an OS drive this is far more important than big sequential numbers like the ones posted here.
Besides for throughput, Corsair's CT128M225 and Crucial's P128 are much better overall. Plus, I'm starting to get rather annoyed. What's with this new business model over the last few years? I remember when the latest and best model got the high price tag, then dropped in price as a newer and better model came out. Nowadays, the latest model price stays the same (or in SSD's cases, goes up) when a newer but lower performance model comes out.
The 80GB X25-M is currently $289 on newegg. how is this a value at $169 for 40GB, plus it's much slower?
"According to specs revealed to us, the value SSD will provide reading speeds of up to 170 MB/sec. and write speeds of up to 40 MB/sec"
TLC anyone?
Lol, this product sucks.
The small random reads will still far exceed the Velociraptor though. For an OS drive this is far more important than big sequential numbers like the ones posted here.
benchmarkturbaters like big numbers... not actual performance and usefullness
benchmarkturbaters like big numbers... not actual performance and usefullness
But in this case the big numbers are actually small numbers. Had they posted up a comparison of a HDD and this SSD in 4kB random reads it would have dominated. My OCZ Vertex (not directly comparable of course) is 25x faster than my WD Caviar Black. Wouldn't "25x faster than a spinning platter hard drive!!!!!!" look better than this?
LMAO, EPIC fail this time Intel. If it were 80G, maybe, but forty, LOL.
Intel SSD's = FAIL unless you are rich and like throwing money away.....
Im fine with dual 640's in raid 0, Intel can keep their overpriced drives....
Well, while 40 GB isn't much, it's large enough for a boot drive. The write speeds might suck, but other than install and updates, you're not going to be writing to the drive too much if it's only a boot drive. But I do have to agree that $160 is a bit too much for this. I think it's because they don't want people buying two of these for RAID 0 instead of an 80 GB M series. If this drive was either 60 GB, or more towards $120, I'd find it much more appealing.
Wow I have mixed feelings about this drive. It was just the other day that I wondering why Intel didn't have a 40 gig ssd out because for the right price it would dominate the market (assuming it has similar performance of course). At $160, this drive is a little enticing but as other commenters have pointed out, it doesn't improve GB/$. The thing that will make or break this drive is real world performance. 170 MB/s read and 40 MB/s write means next to nothing to those of us who are actually in the market for a ssd. If this "budget" drive actually has similar performance to its big brother, this will be a really attractive option. If, however, its performance falls short of an OCZ Vertex 32 GB's performance, specifically in random reads and writes, then it'll flop. I sincerely hope for the sake of everybody in the market for a ssd on a budget, including myself, that this drive performs competitively.
I'll wait until I can get a 120GB drive with X25-M speeds for ~$1/gig. Until them my 640GB 32MB Caviar Black is good enough. This thing is too over priced for the performance.
So, it's half the size, almost half the write speeds, for not even close to half of Intel's MSRP on the X25-M-G2 80GB. On the good side, read speeds are still high so applications should be much more responsive that they would be on a standard HDD.
Kind of a drag, really...
I'll wait until I can get a 120GB drive with X25-M speeds for ~$1/gig. Until them my 640GB 32MB Caviar Black is good enough. This thing is too over priced for the performance.
These SSDs look like garbage, but a good SSD is more of a performance boost than a new CPU/RAM/Motherboard.
Hmmm this would be cool for ready boost, didn't they unlimit it for 7? One drive for ready boost another nice fast hard drive for swap and a third slower drive for the OS. Last but not least would be one for media and back ups
Starting to sound like my machine I am posting from... (well except the ready boost drive)
Hmmm this would be cool for ready boost, didn't they unlimit it for 7? One drive for ready boost another nice fast hard drive for swap and a third slower drive for the OS. Last but not least would be one for media and back ups Starting to sound like my machine I am posting from... (well except the ready boost drive)
40GB of ready-boost? Are you...?
wow 40mb/s read, no thanks
Your name says it all.
Hell, I just bought 8x500GB 7200.10 drives with a raid card on a C2D system... less than the ost of three of there...
Let's see ... more expensive (per GB) and lower performance. No thanks.
In defense of the other Intel drives, 7200 RPM drives in a RAID setup don't even begin to compare to the performance of the X25-M. You have to see the performance to believe it.
Example: I can launch Firefox, Microsoft Visual Studio 2008, Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio and other apps in sequence and each app is up and running in less time than it takes to select the next app.
I will try to say something that others have not said and not include my opinion.
Some say you can use this for a boot drive, I just want to add that "boot drive" will also contain all of your programs, not just the OS. This may work for some people and not for others. In an office, a 40GB drive is fine when data is stored on a network. For someone that just surfs the web at home - this works well too. For software developers, this size may be too small to hold all development tools. Anyone that installs a lot of big programs may feel 40GB is too cramped. I would say the target audience is limited, but is not for "power users". Also, the price of $160 may seem high but if you do not need more than 40GB then $160 for a performance boost may not be that bad.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820141420
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820141420
woah! Don't buy that! It has the single JMicron controller that is prone to stutter (aka incredibly bad random write speeds.)
will arrive as a 2.5-inch MLC drive with an earnest 40 GB capacity.
WTF is this shit Intel. That ain't cheaper. The 80GB X25-M is like $240 and owns this thing on speed.
WTF is this shit Intel. That ain't cheaper. The 80GB X25-M is like $240 and owns this thing on speed.
It is "cheaper," in that you can buy one of these drives for less money than the other. It's not really looking like a better value, though.
40GB of ready-boost? Are you...?
"Imagine a beowulf cluster of these things!"
to slow for write speed. Id rather get a 10,000rpm drive for $200-250 still for the master drive. I was waiting for this to be at least 80gb or for the real successor to SSD 1.0. Im waiting until next year for true SSD2.0's or for these older ones price to drop $100 that will be cheaper and with at least 250mb/sec read and 70/sec write.