Intel Pulls Out $1.25B to Settle All AMD Problems
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (80) |
- Share
Intel digs deep into its pocket once again to settle competition with AMD.
In what could be one of the closing chapters in a long-lasting saga, Intel Corporation and Advanced Micro Devices today announced a comprehensive agreement to end all outstanding legal disputes between the companies, including antitrust litigation and patent cross license disputes.
In a joint statement, the two companies commented, "While the relationship between the two companies has been difficult in the past, this agreement ends the legal disputes and enables the companies to focus all of our efforts on product innovation and development."
Under terms of the agreement:
- AMD and Intel obtain patent rights from a new 5-year cross license agreement
- Intel and AMD will give up any claims of breach from the previous license agreement
- Intel will pay AMD $1.25 billion.
- Intel agrees to abide by a set of business practice provisions.
As a result, AMD will drop all pending litigation including the case in U.S. District Court in Delaware and two cases pending in Japan. AMD will also withdraw all of its regulatory complaints worldwide. The agreement will be made public in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
Sponsored links
Related articles
-
CES 2007: The battle for the digital home - analyst opinion
Get ready for the battle for the digital home: CES and Macworld are just a few days away and both will lure you with new media center devices. Behind the scenes, Apple, Microsoft, Intel, and AMD are assembling the core technologies, but the front end is more interesting: HP, Dell and Apple will be the primary vendors making a run at this new market. Let's have a closer look. Currently, the digital home market is a big mess of offerings with little of the standardization that should define a consumer-oriented market. There is way too much visible technology and the truly good solutions are often defined by the tens of thousands of dollars they cost and massive amount of professional services they require to get installed. The biggest problem has been content, or more accurately, the lack of good content as content owners in response to media pirating have gone down the questionable path of largely punishing people who buy their content because they don't seem to be effective at going after the folks that don't. Movies and Music are the only two things I know of that are actually more valuable if they are obtained illegally than if they are purchased: Illegal content can be used everywhere while legally purchased content comes with so many restrictions that I often wonder why any of us buy it twice. At least with music, you can put it on MP3 players and share it around your home through products like the Sonos system but movies have been problematic. There are heavy restrictions and no real ability to rip them into solutions that could make whole house systems useful; and, not to forget, they are incredibly expensive. There have been subscription services from companies like Vongo, Cinema Now and Microsoft, but the libraries have been pitiful, the HD content largely non-existent and the ability to watch the downloaded film anyplace virtually impossible. Really, if you think about it, these services are more of a curiosity than a solution to date. Apple is the poster child with respect to a high tech vendor who has entered the consumer electronics space and made a killing. This, however, mostly largely happened by beating other technology vendors to the punch - with products the consumer electronics vendors mostly didn't understand. The tragic competitive example was the initial Sony MP3 line, which, physically, was vastly more attractive than Apple's. But its was so difficult to use, largely due to the heavy protections on the media, that virtually no one bought these devices. Today, there are four areas of use for consumer electronics devices - (1) personal (iPod), (2) living room (media center), (3) home distribution (media extenders), and (4) car. And there are five types of media: Audio only (music and podcasts), commercial video (TV and movies), personal video (home movies), photographs, and video games. The winning vendor in the digital home battle will be the one that can cover most of these scenarios in a fashion that is easy, relatively inexpensive and at an acceptable level of reliability. Apple shows the way What I find rather interesting is that, when Apple brought the iPod out, they demonstrated how to present a technology product to a consumer electronics audience. They focused on making the product easy to use, making content easily available, created a solid sexy industrial design and marketed the key product features of "fun" and "semi-exclusive" to an ever growing audience of consumers who even surprised Apple with their incredibly eager response. For years after the launch of the iPod, competing vendors have largely ignored the Apple lesson and focused instead on technology and ignored, in particular, the importance of ease of use and marketing in making a product successful. HP probably came closest to such a product that, however, was never actually launched. The reason we know is that, after Steve Jobs had learned about the product, he called HP CEO Carly Fiorina and convinced her to license his product. Steve implied that HP could actually end up selling more of them than Apple given HP's better retail presence and the firm's potential capability to transcode (get iTunes music to work on their Windows Media Center natively). Of course transcoding wasn't allowed (doing this while protecting the DRM aspect of the file was incredibly difficult anyway) and Jobs denied all requests for custom colors (including black) indicating they were inappropriate for the product. While this deal may come back to haunt Apple during their own iPod anti-trust trial which was disclosed by Apple's board a few days ago (much like similar Microsoft actions did) it did prevent HP from entering and Apple remains predominant. However, one challenger did step up and after doing a deal with Real Networks (Rhapsody) and Best Buy, Sandisk now has 18% of this market and for much of last year was the fastest growing vendor in it. This suggests at least one competing vendor is learning. Best Buy is truly a retailer to watch because they recently brought out a home automation solution in a box which, while too expensive for most, is probably very close to the best you can do with current technology. Still, Apple enters 2007 as the company in the pole position with the best chance of having the next generation of market leading offerings which are expected to include their iTV, their iPod Phone, and media enhancements (including hardware design changes) that make them better products for media in and around the home. Interesting enough, even though Apple doesn't do car audio, they've turned the iPod into a decent automotive accessory and many use it today instead of their nearly obsolete automotive CD changers and players. Even though it isn't particularly elegant as a media distribution solution, Apple's iPod effectively addresses all but the game category of media now and all areas of the home and car through iPod accessories. CES 2007 solutions At CES - and MacWorld - we will be seeing a number of solutions that move media around in the home, on your person, and in your car. The key test will be whether the solutions are comprehensive, easy to use, affordable, and are connected to adequate content. Some of the best offerings you are likely to see will address one or two media types and four of the five areas that you may want to consume media in. A lot of the products you'll see will try to address everything but probably won't do any one thing well enough to be successful (sometimes products that do one thing well like Sonos with music or Tivo for TV will still be best for many of us.) However, there will be one or two vendors who will come very close to getting this right - other than Apple this year. I already got a look into Bill Gates' keynote and he will be attempting (and it is a good attempt!) to catch Apple napping and it won't be until Steve Jobs presents that we will know which CEO was the most successful. Another company to watch is HP as they roll out the most comprehensive set of CE products ever seen from any technology vendor, literally blanketing the digital home. But, whoever wins, make sure the products you get excited about and possibly purchase have access to the content you want. Otherwise, they will just be expensive shelf warmers and many of us already have too many of those. Rob Enderle is principal analyst for the Enderle Group. He can be reached at renderle@enderlegroup.com.
Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $310.00 STAPLES More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Quad... | $169.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
Phenom II X2 550 Dual Core Processor... | $90.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i7-860 Quad Core Processor... | $279.99 Newegg.com More info |
AES-NI Performance Analyzed; Limited To 32nm Core i5 CPUs
Starting with its dual-core Clarkfield-based Core i5 processors, Intel is introducing AES New Instructions to its architecture. We've already seen great benefits from a number of synthetic benchmarks, but what are the real-life advantages of this tech? Read More
-
Phenom II X2 555 Vs. Pentium G6950: New Budget Dual-Core Titans
AMD is launching a broad spectrum of new CPUs today. And while most are simple speed bumps, today we're pitting its fastest dual-core model, the Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition, against Intel's LGA 1156-based Pentium G6950 to see who rules for under $100. Read More
-
Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: January '10
December was a somewhat slow month in the CPU world, but January promises to inject a great deal of excitement into the sector with some major announcements. We discuss some of the potential changes and make our recommendations in this month's article. Read More
All performance charts
- Intel Launches Ereader for the Blind
- Confirmed: Apple Puts Wrench Into Hackintoshes
- Nvidia CEO: Apple Uses the Best Technology









Hell has frozen over.
Hell has frozen over.
Let it snow let it snow.
*Throws a snowball @jazzmain*
So by "5-year cross license agreement" does that mean AMD has access to all Intel's patents and whatnot?
This is interesting! I wonder if they'll use any of that money for a tour of Bill Gates house...
Maybe this is from the Yes Men.
How much of the 1.25b is left after AMD has to pay their lawyers?
Money. The problem -and- the solution to all life's problems.
-Homer (except he said Beer)
"AMD will also withdraw all of its regulatory complaints worldwide."
So does this mean that Intel is off the hook for all the anti-competitive crap they've been getting in trouble with over the last year or so... If so, $1.25 billion sounds on the light side... didn't they give Dell $6 billion over a period of 5 years?
Poor lawers behind all that... They can kiss their christmast bonus goodbye

Should have been more than 1.25 billion because Intel kept AMD from making potential financial gains. And AMD would be in much better position to compete in the market during this recession .... that were still in.
So who won? Did AMD get the better end of the deal? I doubt Intel would have settled like this if it hadn't been getting pressured by the EU, Korea, and New York.
AMD could have gotten a LOT more. I'd have given them 10 billion if I were on a jury. Nice move Intel.
If this was the quickie settlement, I wonder how much Intel would stand to owe AMD if all of the legal disputes were allowed to play out over the years!
We will be back here in 4 years once the new patent cross license agreement is due to expire. Until then prepare to pay higher prices on CPUs. Intel will recover $1.25B from you and AMD will enjoy the higher prices also.
I guess this means all that B.S. about GlobalFoundries not having permission to produce x86 chips is gone too. I can't believe AMD settled for so little. According to another article I read, they still have over $3-billion in debt, this doesn't even cover half that.
And I agree clemaaron. Intel paid dell $6-billion to not sell AMD chips, but now AMD gets only $1.25 billion as an "oops, our bad" apology? Maybe the figure was reduced because AMD admitted some fault of their own.
Don't know. Either way, we have 5 years until more dirt turns up on Intel and they go into another "everything belongs to us" tirade against their competitors.
In the meantime, I'm going to wait and see how much they end up paying Nvidia to settle those claims.
So by "5-year cross license agreement" does that mean AMD has access to all Intel's patents and whatnot?
Probably not ALL of them, but enough that, for example, Intel can't sue AMD for using x86 and AMD can't sue Intel for using x86-64.
I sure would like to be the lawyer who took a percentage cut out of the 1.25 billion dollars.
There is an additional information that isn't made clear in this article, and a very important one, I might say: AMD is now able to go completely fabless, and even to the length of being able to choose where to produce it's chips, it doesn't have to be only Globalfoundries. Anandtech has more information on it.
This wont stop "over" zealous prosecuting attorneys from charging Intel with Antitrust lawsuits. It's a win-win for AMD.
So by "5-year cross license agreement" does that mean AMD has access to all Intel's patents and whatnot?
no details yet in the cross-license agreement, but hopefully it's a nice smooth transition so BOTH companies can get back to work and actually compete fairly.
Hmm, wonder what this does for the NY State AG Cuomo's antitrust investigation? If he has to drop it, would be a blow to his political aspirations
.
thank god! i don't want amd to die! it keeps intel's processors cheap
"AMD will also withdraw all of its regulatory complaints worldwide."So does this mean that Intel is off the hook for all the anti-competitive crap they've been getting in trouble with over the last year or so... If so, $1.25 billion sounds on the light side... didn't they give Dell $6 billion over a period of 5 years?
To quote the NY Times, "However, the Intel-AMD settlement does not end separate antitrust actions against Intel by government bodies in the Europe, Asia and the United States."
This is Intel's way of getting AMD off their backs for another 5 years or so, and is more or less a tacit admission that they would lose a legal battle in the end - one that could potentially be more costly than the $1.25 billion they are shelling out here. In fact, they stated that themselves:
"The final negotiating point, Mr. Otellini said, was how much Intel would pay A.M.D. He said that it pained him to write such a big check, but $1.2 billion might well be a 'small multiple' of the company’s potential liability if it lost a jury trial in Delaware."
But no, it certainly doesn't affect the antitrust lawsuits already filed by government entities (Korea, the European Union, and now New York).
Granted, it's hard to try and recoup losses from bygone years, regardless of how ill-gotten those gains might have been. I think AMD acknowledges that the only way they will get market share back is to focus more on development and their new GlobalFoundries fab. The government antitrust lawsuits don't funnel any money into AMD anyways - it would just be in the form of fines that would go straight back into government coffers.
In other words, AMD will gladly take that money and run with it, and let Intel continue to be caught up with government watchdogs.
Looks like AMD is really short of cash. Hope that 1.25B will keep it alive for a while.
Just like presidenteody said... we need AMD to push Intel and keep the CPU price low!
AMD could have gotten a LOT more. I'd have given them 10 billion if I were on a jury. Nice move Intel.
A solid deal for AMD and a bargain for Intel. AMD could have potential scored much more in court, but it would probably have taken about a decade more in appeals and counter suits to prevail. They wouldn't have lasted that long.
This is like a boxing match, and Mike Tyson (in his prime) just picked some poor guy off the floor and dusted him off so they can keep fighting.
I guess that's how AMD makes a profit these days... lol
A solid deal for AMD and a bargain for Intel. AMD could have potential scored much more in court, but it would probably have taken about a decade more in appeals and counter suits to prevail. They wouldn't have lasted that long.
Agreed. It's unrealistic to think AMD could have scored a multi-billion dollar judgment in the next 5 years, and even if they did, Intel would appeal and it'd be another 10 years before that would be resolved. For Intel, 1.25 billion is a bargain. It's more the perception that Intel caved and now AMD's claims are validated. Intel looks like a bully and now virtually every government is watching them like a hawk.
I think the clincher for AMD in this deal, isn't the money, its the agrrement from intel to drop their requirement that AMD produce the majority (or any) of their chips in-house. Which is THE most important part of the deal as it allows AMD to pursue the business model they have wanted to for a number of years now. I can't believe Tom's didn't even mention this! shocking.
The new cross license deal is essentially renewing the old one, but with this one major omission from it.
as said above Anandtech has an excellent article on this.
Does the cross licensing include graphics or just CPU? Core i11 6 core cpu with 400, 800, 1600 stream processors?
Intel probably could have bought AMD for that much? AMTEL CPUs anyone?
AMD needs the money NOW. Don't underestimate 1.2B. This money will give them over 5.2B liquid, and they owe about 2.1B in short-term debt. The extra will enable AMD to pay debt service for their longer term debt of 5.2B. On paper AMD will actually show a NET POSITIVE Balance Sheet for the first time in a long time.
In 5 years, we will all have affordable 22nm (and probably 16 or 32 cores) with an effort already in the works for 2 years hitting the 16nm mark. By this time, a completely different architecture of CPU may need to be designed since you can't keep shrinking much passed 16nm. Quantum computing with the manipulation of electron spin would be awesome. Your desktop would essentially be what we call a supercomputer today.