Jury throws out Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI after less than two hours of deliberation — Unanimous vote that Musk filed the lawsuit too late

Elon Musk at Republican Conference meeting.
(Image credit: Getty Images/Andrew Harnik)

A federal jury in Oakland, California, on Monday unanimously rejected every claim in Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI, CEO Sam Altman, co-founder Greg Brockman, and Microsoft. The nine-member jury found that Musk filed too late, with all claims barred by the statute of limitations. Deliberations began at 8:30 a.m. Pacific and ended at 10:23 a.m. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers immediately accepted the verdict as her own.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • hotaru251
    git bent muskrat.

    I dislike openai greatly but the muskrat deserves every L he can get.

    also wasn't he only whining after they removed him as he had also planned to make it for profit early on?

    anyone who paid attention to "ai"'s cost knew that it was always going to be for profit as it is impossible to do otherwise and still be relevant
    Reply
  • alan.campbell99
    Some form of M.A.D. would have been nice to see but there was never any chance of that imho.
    Reply
  • ravewulf
    Lol
    Reply
  • blppt
    Must be nice to waste taxpayer money with frivolous lawsuits. Ahhh, to be insanely rich.
    Reply
  • blppt
    hotaru251 said:
    git bent muskrat.

    I dislike openai greatly but the muskrat deserves every L he can get.

    also wasn't he only whining after they removed him as he had also planned to make it for profit early on?

    anyone who paid attention to "ai"'s cost knew that it was always going to be for profit as it is impossible to do otherwise and still be relevant
    Politics aside, I find it absolutely fascinating that so many people line up to throw money at Musk when he was AGAIN appearing high in public at the China summit.

    High finance continues to make no sense to me.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    alan.campbell99 said:
    Some form of M.A.D. would have been nice to see but there was never any chance of that imho.
    I know. I really wanted them both to somehow lose!

    I think maybe there's an upside though, in terms of what's come to light in the discovery process and testimony? Usually, cases like this get settled out of court, and that info never sees the light of day. Now, it's public record!
    Reply
  • bit_user
    blppt said:
    Must be nice to waste taxpayer money with frivolous lawsuits. Ahhh, to be insanely rich.
    Since this is a civil case, Musk should be paying the court costs.
    Reply
  • helper800
    blppt said:
    Must be nice to waste taxpayer money with frivolous lawsuits. Ahhh, to be insanely rich.
    The amount of tax revenue generated from the cost of the lawyers alone is orders of magnitude more than the cost to try the case.
    Reply
  • American2021
    Sorry Elon, I was rooting for you against evil Sam, but an Oakland California jury? Seriously though?
    Reply
  • blppt
    American2021 said:
    Sorry Elon, I was rooting for you against evil Sam, but an Oakland California jury? Seriously though?
    As if somehow that jury pool would be more likely to side with Altman without supporting evidence?

    Neither guy is particularly likeable, no matter where you held the trial, unless you held it in an area where a Tesla Gigafactory is the only steady employment.
    Reply