Market slumps as OpenAI reportedly misses internal targets for active users and revenue — Nvidia, Oracle, AMD, and CoreWeave shares all tremble on the news

Sam Altman looking pensive
(Image credit: Getty Images / Bloomberg)

OpenAI has reportedly missed its internal targets for the number of active ChatGPT users, as well as multiple revenue goals. Because of this, The Wall Street Journal reports that CFO Sarah Friar has expressed worries about whether the firm can afford the billions of dollars of future compute contracts it has taken on.

The company is banking on explosive growth to fund all these expenses, with Altman and Friar saying in a joint statement toWSJ, “We are totally aligned on buying as much compute as we can and working hard on it together every day.” Many corporate investors felt that it was on the right track, with the startup raising $122 billion in its latest funding round, exceeding it $100 billion target. However, one analyst said that OpenAI could run out of cash by mid-2027 unless it continues bringing in massive amounts of investments, like what we saw recently.

Latest Videos From

Despite this, Altman has signed deals worth billions of dollars to secure future computing power, including a 4.5-gigawatt contract with Oracle worth $300 billion and a $100 billion alliance that will deliver 10 gigawatts’ worth of Nvidia hardware to data centers.

The market has seemingly panicked about the news of OpenAI’s missed targets, renewing fears that the AI fever among investors could break. Nevertheless, it seems that Altman is pushing to acquire more computing power, arguing that shortages in capacity is what’s limiting the startup’s growth. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei once said in a conference that some companies are pushing for infrastructure investments too far, but OpenAI disagreed. In a memo addressed to its investors, OpenAI said, “In hindsight, that caution looks less like discipline and more like underestimating how fast demand would arrive" — a statement that might now seem overly optimistic.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • Marlin1975
    Thats because the only ones buying AI and its hardware are about 90% a circle it seems of late.
    They are running out of unlimited money and people want to know what they are getting. Only thing is over swollen stock prices that they need to dip out soon unless they want to be last holding the bag.
    Reply
  • PEnns
    Whoa!!! That so unbelievably sad and totally unexpected!!

    /s
    Reply
  • ottonis
    Casual users have mostly stopped usung chatgpt as they get more accurate results by just typing their qeestion in their browser and letting gemini answer it. So, why would anybody want to pay for AI services, except they need them as professional tools for coding.
    Reply
  • RoLleRKoaSTeR
    From FARK!

    "Is that a *POP* on the horizon?"
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    infinite scale is unsustainable & infinite investment is as well.
    Reply
  • Lieutenant Barclay
    ottonis said:
    Casual users have mostly stopped usung chatgpt as they get more accurate results by just typing their qeestion in their browser and letting gemini answer it. So, why would anybody want to pay for AI services, except they need them as professional tools for coding.
    So Gemini is a better slop machine? Especially for slop coding? Got it.
    Reply
  • ottonis
    Lieutenant Barclay said:
    So Gemini is a better slop machine? Especially for slop coding? Got it.
    No, people pay for Claude if they want to code, not for Gemini.
    I said "casual users" have switched to Gemini because it's more convenient and does indeed offer better results than the free ChatGPT.
    And yes, AI code is indeed something companies are starting to rethink.
    Windos 11 for example was already bad from start, but got increasingly worse, the more AI-generated code they incorporated into it.
    A German IT company has fired 700 of their staff, replacing them with AI, and AI did such a horrible job that same company hired their former employees back.
    Reply
  • endocine
    "CFO Sarah Friar has expressed worries about whether the firm can afford the billions of dollars of future compute contracts it has taken on."
    This is the understatement of the century.
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    OpenAI isn't hitting its user adoption and revenue goals, yet not continuing to suck up the world's compute power is somehow an underestimation of the demand that's out there? Alarm bells should be going off everywhere right now. OpenAI built it, people came, people decided AI wasn't as useful or valuable as OpenAI thought it was, and now OpenAI screams "build it and they will come" louder??? It's over. They came, they tried it, and they left.

    Pop the bubble!
    Reply
  • xiq
    Don't worry, Sam, I'm sure everyone is gonna buy a subscription to ChatGPT soon and you'll make some sort of income to make the investors less scared. Just keep doing what you're doing and it will definelty work👍.
    Reply